10 Movies That Spent Decades In Development Hell

How many were actually worth the wait?

Watchmen Development Hell
Warner Bros

Development hell is a difficult place to escape from. Just ask Channing Tatum; the star/producer of Gambit has spent over four years trying to get that movie up and running since it was first announced, and the project is now looking for its fourth director after Rupert Wyatt, Doug Liman and Gore Verbinski all jumped ship.

There are so many ideas floating around Hollywood at any one given time that its an inevitability that some of them end up getting put on the back burner whether it be due to rights issues, finding the right creative team to bring the story to life or trying to cobble a budget together.

Plenty of movies have escaped from development hell over the years with varying degrees of success; Ryan Reynolds' perseverance turned Deadpool into a box office juggernaut, Warcraft became the highest-grossing comic book movie in history and The Dark Tower... is a thing that exists.

Being stuck in development hell isn't the death-knell for a movie (well, apart from Superman Lives), but plenty of projects have nonetheless found themselves trapped there for a very long time. Whether or not they were worth the wait is a matter of personal preference, but spending so long in cinematic limbo often results in a very different movie than what was originally in mind.

10. Freddy Vs Jason

Watchmen Development Hell
New Line Cinema

With most of the big-name horror franchises having been run into the ground over the course of countless terrible sequels churned out on an almost-annual basis, a crossover between two icons of the genre may have been the only fresh spin left to put on both Mr. Krueger and Mr. Voorhees when Freddy vs. Jason was initially announced.

Pitting Freddy against Jason on the big screen was first attempted in 1987, but the inability between rival studios Paramount and New Line Cinema to agree on a suitable story proved a real stumbling block, as you could imagine neither wanted their most famous serial killer to be portrayed as weaker than the other.

The desire to franchise the sh*t out of both characters didn't help matters, either. The rights to the Friday the 13th series were sold to New Line after 1989's Jason Takes Manhattan, but Wes Craven returned to Elm Street with New Nightmare before New Line went on to churn out Jason X just to squeeze every last penny out of the property, which dashed the in-development Freddy vs. Jason's hopes of being made... for the time being.

When the movie finally did hit in 2003, it earned a solid $114.9m at the box office and proved to be a hit among genre fans, if not really anybody else. As a whole, Freddy vs Jason is about as 'early 2000's' as a studio horror movie can be for better or worse; its got terrible dialogue, cringey one-liners, crap CGI, Kelly Rowland in a supporting role and Powerman 5000 on the soundtrack.

In this post: 
Watchmen
 
Posted On: 
Contributor

I don't do social media, so like or follow me in person but please maintain a safe distance or the authorities will be notified. Don't snap me though, I'll probably break. I was once labelled a misogynist on this very site in a twenty paragraph-long rant for daring to speak ill of the Twilight franchise. I stand by what I said, it's crap.