Let’s face it, we all love to hate on terrible films, and often there’s nothing more enjoyable or uniting than collectively voicing your grievances upon seeing a recent stinker. But what can easily get overlooked when focusing on this critical response is a film’s commercial success, or lack of. In a number of cases those guilty films thankfully get their just deserts – disasters such as Battlefield Earth, Gigli, and Catwoman not only quickly found themselves rated amongst the worst films of all time, but also flopped spectacularly at the box office as movie-goers made it perfectly clear to filmmakers what they thought of their efforts by withholding their wallets.
However, it is becoming increasingly common to look at lists of highest-grossing films and be thoroughly baffled at just how financially successful that one movie you thought was terrible in fact turned out to be. Indeed, no matter how terrible the critics though a film, all too often the ability to turn a profit may have resulted in filmmakers crafting a sequel, most likely low in quality again but high in returned revenue. It’s like a magical phenomenon with no explanation, and as this list of ten such films shows, it’s not exactly stopping soon…
Incredibly the figures below are real worldwide box-office figures.
10. Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End – $963,420,425
And was a film ever more accurately named? Dead Man’s Chest wasn’t quite as disappointing as many feared it might be and at least ended with the tantalising cliffhanger of the return of Geoffrey Rush’s Barbossa, but any momentum gained from those closing scenes was quickly lost as the plots and subplots of this behemoth second sequel unfolded before us. Filming reportedly began without a completed script and it shows. Even as the climactic finale approaches after several hours spent meandering through a myriad of dull personal vendettas, endless shifts of allegiance, and borderline racist depictions of any pirate who isn’t English, we’re still forced to accept the contrived plot device whereby Keira Knightley manages to become king of all the world’s pirates, ever, her head-girl reminiscent attempts at a rabble-rousing speech, and a showdown between two vast naval fleets that will only actually involve three ships and manage to include a vomit-inducing marriage ceremony.
Granted, some of the special effects were fantastic and Johnny Depp’s Jack Sparrow could still be humorous on occasion, but the character was beginning to grate and couldn’t redeem this bloated mess of a film. Costing $300 million, still the most expensive film ever made, Pirates 3 nevertheless managed to gross over three times its budget and become the most successful film of 2007.
8 Actresses Who Tricked You Into Thinking You Saw Them Nude
11 Irresistible Movie Moments That Wore Out Your Pause Button
100 Things Wrong With The Dark Knight Rises [Video]
10 Scenes You Won't Believe You Missed in 2012
10 Most Infuriating Movie Cliffhangers
10 Major Plot Holes You Probably Missed
10 Happy Movie Endings That Probably Had Horrific Consequences
12 Ruthless Movie Villains Who Were Defeated By Complete Fools
Want to write about the stuff you're passionate about and have your work read by an audience of over 10 million a month? Click here to become a contributor.








20 Comments
Thank you. I hated The Hangover Part II because the first one was so good! it didn’t seen a sequel.
I’d say very few of these were terrible , bad but not terrible and stop hating on indie 4
I don’t hate Indy 4, plenty of other critcs/fans go so far as denying its very existence. The point I made, as I did in other cases, was that it ended up being disappointing for many after the popularity and quality of the earlier ones. It does have some good moments but also some plain stupid ones, whether you’re a fan assessing them or not.
Point taken, but it’s easy to exaggerate from bad to terrible.
Where is Avatar?
It’s been a while since I’ve seen it but I always thought Spider-Man 3 wasn’t terrible. Sure it couldn’t compare to the first two and the emo Peter Parker scenes were just stupid but I still found a lot to enjoy in it
Since when do you get to decide what is a terrible film? At World’s End was an entertaining film to millions of us of course you have a right to your opinion which obviously isn’t worth.
Critically it was hated – I assume that’s how he decided.
Yes, there’s not much point giving a review of a film six years on as if that’s going to change the majority view, or just descending into platitudes along the line of “everyone’s entitled to their own opinion”- of course they are! Clearly there a lot of people who will have enjoyed at least one of the films on the list for whatever reason.
Fact is, Pirates 3 was very badly received critically (hence it fits the theme of the article), but as a fan of the first two films myself I also really had problems with it (e.g. the reasons laid out in the entry). It also grossed $100 million less than Dead Man’s Chest, suggesting that it was also less popular with audiences as well as with critics.
I though that At Worlds End was an awesome film and quite enjoyable, in fact it’s my favorite of the 4. Also in my opinion it’s head and shoulders above Stranger Tides.
Indiana Jones 4 the only mistake there was the inter-dimensional aliens. That type of thing was seriously out of place for an Indy adventure, sometimes I feel that I would of been more satisfied if the big reveal was that the skull belonged to an intelligent Crypt-zoological animal from myth.
Spider-Man 3 had three strikes against it which ruined the entire thing. Emo Peter, Sandman killed Ben (I Suspect if there was a fourth we would have found out that it was actually the VULTURE), and finally a wimpy venom.
Yeah, that definitely would have been more in keeping with the Indy universe, nice thought.
At World’s End, both ‘awesome film’ and ‘quite enjoyable’- which is it?
at world’s end was great .. Did you know what terrible even means ?
Not read the books, Harry Potter mainly the last 2…yawn fest.
Avatar yes visually stunning when you first see it, but it was the hype that made people see it with the 3d.
Star Wars prequels; we went to see it because its called Star Wars
Alice in Wonderland yes, I didnt like it same with Willy Wonka and the chocolate factory it just didnt work with me.
I rather enjoyed Alice in Wonderland. I didn’t have expectations for it and I thought it did well. Quantum of Solace was all right all things considered.
I was expecting this list to be off the mark but it’s pretty much on the money.
I really dislike people writing on this website things like the following: “what makes you an expert on football transfers? Are you a club employee?” or “why do you get to decide what is a bad film?” The fact is this website houses an infinite amount of opinion pieces and everyone has the right to say something is terrible or great so asking someone, “Since when do you get to decide what is a terrible film?” is just hugely annoying – disagreeing and debating with someone’s opinion piece is great but suggesting someone cannot say something is bad or wrong simply because they are not working for a football club or are not already established film critics is just foolish.
and btw, this piece was a really good read, I enjoyed it! Mostly spot on in my opinion.
Thanks! glad you enjoyed it.
Quantum and Indy 4 are perfect for this list. It’s not just terrible films, but terrible films that could have been great. I mean, after Royale and Indy 3 I was dying to see the next round… then I have Bourne Bond and Shia trying to act like Brando and swinging with monkeys with a CGI background. Gah.
Oh yeah! I’d forgotten the implications of Shia’s greaser impression.
I agree with most of these, but the some stretch the definition of “terrible” a bit too far. I can understand people not liking At World’s End, but is it really terrible? Most people I know loved it. And while I admit that Crystal Skull does not live up to some of the previous movies in the series, when taken alone, it is still a decent action flick. Disappointing and terrible are not the same thing.
Point taken, but it’s easy to exaggerate and terrible does make for a more emphatic heading. In the case of Spiderman 3 and Indy 4 I don’t think they were terrible films as such (though both had their fair share of terrible scenes and dialogue), but given how much time has elapsed since their release I felt it was equally important to summarise the critical and fan reaction at the time, as well as my own opinion, and for many they were terrible.
Nothing will redeem Pirates 3 for me however, even though I’ll freely admit it had the odd funny moment.