STATE OF PLAY is a movie that has had some serious problems, both in terms of its screenplay (four writers in six months) and it’s actors (Brad Pitt’s last minute exit, Russell Crowe saving the day).
This film’s been on my radar ever since I heard about Universal picking up the movie rights to the BBC series and I’m amazed it hasn’t completely imploded with all the trouble its had.
Edward Norton, who was set to star as an on-the-up politician embroiled in a murder investigation, has exited the project due to his commitment to LEAVES OF GRASS.
Norton’s replacement looks like it’ll be Ben Affleck, an actor I like a lot and can’t for the life of me understand why he’s had so much abuse thrown at him.
As much as a FIGHT CLUB reunion with Pitt and Norton was exciting I think they’ve finally got the casting for these two roles bang on.
The two key parts in the story are the politician (was Norton, now Affleck) and an investigative journalist (was Pitt, now Crowe). To me Pitt and Norton never quite fit their respective roles. Norton would’ve been more believable as a hard-nosed journo while Pitt has the surface sheen that could make for a believable politician.
I think Crowe and Affleck (whose career rehab must been complete after HOLLYWOODLAND and GONE, BABY, GONE) are better choices for these roles.
Hopefully there are no more hiccups for this film, however should the production lose Crowe (and I wouldn’t rule that out considering this film’s track record) then I suggest moving swiftly to get Matt Damon on board.
source – movieblog ugo
8 Actresses Who Tricked You Into Thinking You Saw Them Nude
11 Irresistible Movie Moments That Wore Out Your Pause Button
100 Things Wrong With The Dark Knight Rises [Video]
10 Scenes You Won't Believe You Missed in 2012
10 Most Infuriating Movie Cliffhangers
10 Major Plot Holes You Probably Missed
10 Happy Movie Endings That Probably Had Horrific Consequences
12 Ruthless Movie Villains Who Were Defeated By Complete Fools
Want to write about the stuff you're passionate about and have your work read by an audience of over 10 million a month? Click here to become a contributor.
5 Comments
I agree with you Matt. Norton/Crowe was a lop-sided pairing. Affleck’s an excellent choice.
Usually in these stories the reporter is younger than the politician, or they’re both the same age. If the reporter is going to be older, then you need someone who doesn’t come off as a beanpole compared to an alpha-male reporter–that’s the WORST mix of all.
Affleck works. He was a target ever since Good Will Hunting, but it looks like he’s turned the corner. With him in this movie it’s a must-see for me now.
It wasn’t Matt, JaySmack ;-)
I fail to see how any film starring Ben Affleck can be a must-see. He’s just not very good at acting.
Chasing Amy, Good Will Hunting, Boiler Room, Changing Lanes and Hollywoodland would seem to suggest otherwise, Bale.
Affleck gets a bad rap but he’s a terrific actor whose past agent/s landed him in some awful movies.
Word is he is a pretty fine director too. I should be seeing GONE BABY GONE this week and I will tell ya all what I think!