With Prometheus’ release in theatres almost two months ago, people have been ranting incessantly about “plot holes”, lazy writing, as well as a general sense of disappointment. While I can’t necessarily disagree with some of the negative criticism that director Ridley Scott’s recent science fiction opus has received, I feel the urge, a sudden compulsion, if you will, to tell everybody to chill the hell out. I’m not saying that it was great. It had its fair share of problems. But things have been worse for Alien fans. By worse, I mean Alien Resurrection.
Take a moment to absorb that. I bet you thought that all of those memories, nay, nightmares, of that mess were all but erased. You thought the characters in Prometheus were flat, forgettable, irritating, or flat-out bizarre? You thought that it was completely unnecessary, a total waste, considering the massive amounts of talent behind and in front of the camera? Well just get a load of Resurrection!
First, a little background: despite the critical disappointment of 1992′s Alien 3, 20th Century Fox decided to continue squeezing as much money as possible out of the Alien franchise, as its third installment was still a financial success (though, to be fair, it was just as pointless as what was to come next, but more on that later). They got Joss Whedon (now famous for creating Buffy The Vampire Slayer and directing The Avengers film adaptation) to write the screenplay, as well as Jean-Pierre Jeunet, known for his unique visual style, who was approached for directorial duties, although, beforehand, others such as Peter Jackson, Bryan Singer, and even Trainspotting director Danny Boyle, were given the chance to helm the picture.
You can clearly see the potential within such a project. While it wasn’t something that audiences were really clamoring for, the possibilities for rejuvenation within the series was not completely out of the question. Having watched Mic-Macs, another film directed by Jeunet, I can say that he certainly has a strong visual style that, although not necessarily what I would like to think of as the perfect example of developing the Alien universe, still showed great potential in the eye candy department. To me, and probably many fans at the time, our trust leaned more on Whedon’s side of the development process. Known for his lightning-fast humor and great characters, he seemed like the ideal choice to bring the movie back up to the levels of Aliens, if not Alien itself.
Unfortunately, somewhere down the road, somethings were lost in translation, so to speak. The film details the new exploits of Ellen Ripley, who, following her death at the end of Alien 3, finds herself being cloned in some sort of facility, where the eeeeevvviiiilllllll Weyland-Yutani Corporation (Apparently, in the extended cut, it had been bought-out by Wal-Mart. Yes. I’m serious. Don’t look at me like that) are hoping to extract the queen embryo that had died along with the original Ripley. How? Well, as the movie puts it: they found some samples of Ripley’s blood on Fiorina 161. Look, it’s been a while since I’ve seen it, but as I recall, she’s barely even harmed for the duration of Alien 3, save for, perhaps, the opening, in which her ship had crashed on Fiorina. If the filmmakers are suggesting that the scientists found the blood samples on the ship, why didn’t they make it apparent in the previous film? Despite this being such an important piece of information (the whole reason this damn movie exists in the first place), then why are we given such vague details about it?
In fact, let’s go back to Alien 3 for a moment. If I recall correctly, it had also pulled a similar stunt in order to get the plot going: having Ripley impregnated by a facehugger. Much like with this whole blood sample fiasco, we are never given reason to believe that such a thing would be possible in the previous movie, Aliens, which seemed to end on a very conclusive note (as in, “this is IT”), suggesting that the entirety of the alien species, at least the ones on LV-426, had been bloody annihilated. It didn’t exactly scream for a sequel. It’s not like Alien, in which several questions were left unanswered, and could have easily resulted in a follow-up. If that weren’t enough, the very idea that a facehugger had found it’s way onto the ship is utterly confusing. For one, the queen alien’s “birthing sack” had been blown up, so any theories that it had laid an egg while it remained hidden on the craft are completely out of the question. Thus, we are left to believe that it secretly carried an egg with one of it’s extra arms. But again, this is never really elaborated in either Aliens or Alien 3, merely coming off as a cheap retcon used to put reasoning behind the continuation of the series. The disaster that was Alien 3 is, and always will be, a complete and utter pointless rehash of what had been done so much better in the past. With this in mind, Alien Resurrection is just that. An absolute chore for anybody with a sense of logic. It’s complete existence is negated with a single afterthought.
Now you see how unnecessary another adventure following Ellen Ripley is, but, for the hell of it, let’s take a look at how the movie hold’s up on its own.
As mentioned earlier, Ripley had been cloned. The facility in which the film is set, which hosts a series of “lovable” and endearing” characters (such as General Perez, played by Dan Hedaya, as well as Brad Dourif as Brad Dourif), has hired mercenaries to collect several people that some scientists can use as subjects for tests, which, of course, involve the titular aliens. To start off, I couldn’t care less about any of the characters featured throughout this picture (I was using sarcasm before, if you couldn’t tell). Any sense of likability that we got out of the Ripley character is now gone, replaced by “Obnoxious Action Movie Heroine #27”. What made her the standout amongst other film protagonists was the fact that she showed emotion.
You could see, in previous installments, particularly Alien, that she was probably under a lot of stress, or wracked with sadness at the loss of her friends. Due to her new personality, one that is completely devoid of humanity, as well as the Mercenaries’ utter lack of fear in the aliens, often killing them without even so much as flinching, as though they are invincible, a great deal of tension is missing from the experience. I NEVER felt a sense of urgency because I always knew that Ripley would use her nifty new powers to save the day. She’s like a superhero. At one point, during the film’s climax, she manages to jump a great distance in a single bound without any effort. I realize that it’s become a trend for female characters to be strong, to empower women, but when you’re making an action film, a genre that’s essentially tailored to adrenaline junkies, you have to do just that: get us pumped up. A character like the cloned Ripley, however bad-ass she may be, is completely uninteresting as a character, as you never feel as though she has any reason to fear for her wellbeing. Her character might’ve been an intriguing secondary character, but putting her at the forefront of the story was, honestly, a big mistake. Every character is either a fearless mercenary, an emotionless robot/clone, or a mad scientist. Basically, there’s not a single person you find yourself rooting for because, it would seem, nobody in the movie seems to give a shit about what’s happening.
But look: it’s not a completely awful movie. There are some moments that actually coerce the audience into having a genuine emotional response, though that might depend on how much of an Alien fan you are. One such instance is seen when the scientists try to educate the Ripley clone, and show her a card with a little girl illustrated on it, causing her memories of Newt, a character with whom she had a strong bond. This can either be considered touching (by fans), or confusing (by the general audience, who will likely have no idea why she reacts to the image in such a way as she does). Unfortunately, moments like these are kept to a minimum, and quickly brushed aside for awkward, droll humor (she said “fuck” instead of “fork”. LAUGH!).
By and large, Alien Resurrection is a total failure, both as a sequel, as well as a standalone film. For fans, it’s a strong departure from the dark, visual mastery that previous films had managed to convey. For the common audience, it’s a complete bore, stuffing explosions and blood down our throats as though it will compensate for the lack of any real excitement or thrills. It simply fails to please anyone. People are screaming “bloody murder” in reaction to Prometheus, and it’s inability to live up to the hype, yet we should all be appreciative of how ambitious it was, for the fact that it was actually trying! It’s not perfect, but you could tell that the creative forces behind the production were actually putting in what you could call an effort.
You Might Also Like...
- 10 Screenwriting Lessons You Can Learn From Prometheus
- Quentin Tarantino Calls Prometheus “Dumb”
- Read The Original Alien-Style Prometheus Script
Want to write about the stuff you're passionate about and have your work read by an audience of over 10 million a month? Click here to become a contributor.












7 Comments
Nothing wrong with your views on both films, and I respect your attempt to try and take some of the hate from Prometheus. But I have to ask why you felt we should accept Prometheus isn’t great, but at least it’s not as bad as Alien Resurrection. We could say the same about both AVP films.
Basically I don’t see how 2 wrongs can somehow manage to make 1 seem like a right? Just my opinion. But good shout on some of your points.
Fair point. The review of Alien Resurrection is, in fact, rather old, only having been slightly updated since I had initially written it (the time when the Blu-ray box set had been released). I actually watched the first AVP film as a wee child, and as such, while I can recognize many of it’s faults, I just don’t feel compelled to really mull over it, because, deep down, it has some very odd form of nostalgia factor behind it. Same somehow goes for it’s sequel. Essentially, I just don’t feel that same hateful passion for those films as I do for A:R.
No matter what you do, no matter what people tell you, there’s no way to think of Prometheus without thinking of Alien. It’s just impossible. As such, seeing the complaints of “plot-holes” and all, I took it upon myself to try and spread appreciation of the film by reminding everyone of the franchise’s past (not that I really need to, but I was just having fun anyway). I’m still holding out for the inevitable director’s cut, but if you think Prometheus is great (unless you don’t and I totally missed the point of your comment, in which case I apologize), I can totally respect that. My article was merely an attempt to put some patience into the fans of the series.
“Due to her new personality, one that is completely devoid of humanity, as well as the Mercenaries’ utter lack of fear in the aliens, often killing them without even so much as flinching, as though they are invincible, a great deal of tension is missing from the experience. I NEVER felt a sense of urgency because I always knew that Ripley would use her nifty new powers to save the day. She’s like a superhero. At one point, during the film’s climax, she manages to jump a great distance in a single bound without any effort. I realize that it’s become a trend for female characters to be strong, to empower women, but when you’re making an action film, a genre that’s essentially tailored to adrenaline junkies, you have to do just that: get us pumped up. A character like the cloned Ripley, however bad-ass she may be, is completely uninteresting as a character, as you never feel as though she has any reason to fear for her wellbeing.”
This is almost verbatim my critique of Terminator: Salvation. John Connor became a super-human superhero, so how are we supposed to relate to him?
My thoughts exactly. Literally.
Seriously, I feel as though Alien Resurrection has become the template for all lazy action films, namely material like the Underworld and Resident Evil series. Hopefully, if Terminator 5 doesn’t fall apart (which, really, it should), it’ll have a greater sense of weight to the events that take place. It’s basic filmmaking, baby!
Prometheus is not nearly as bad as some would have you believe, given that these epic space adventure films are rarely made these days. I wish writers would stop ragging on Alien 3 though. Yeah, there are inconsistencies, but who cares? A lot of stuff doesn’t make sense in these films. How did the alien in the first film get so big in 24 hrs without consuming any food? How could Ripley have possibly held onto the ladder in “Aliens” without getting sucked into space. It’s all ridiculous if you think too much about it. Maybe it seems unlikely that alien eggs would be in the escape pod, but killing off Hicks and Newt was a great move allowing Ripley to complete her metamorphosis into a hardened leader. Anyone who has seen the assembly cut of Alien 3 and can’t appreciate the quality of this film shouldn’t be reviewing films in the first place because they just didn’t understand this film. Given the trauma Ripley has gone through and that almost everyone she has ever known is dead, her sacrifice at the end of this film is a fitting end to the series, letting her finally rest in peace.
Relative to the amount of people who saw it and critical reviews, not many people said Prometheus is a bad film, mostly its just a case of geeks and fanboys picking holes in things and that somehow passing as legitimate criticism. Sure plot holes shouldn’t be there, but a bad film they don’t necessarily make.
Alien wise, each to their own and all, but to my mind Alien 3 is worse than Resurrection. The terrible CGI Alien is unforgivable (compared to a decent amount of models etc in Resurrection), though this doesn’t make it bad I know. Despite all its problems, what really put me off Alien 3 was the casting, Weaver aside it felt like an episode of The Bill in space, led by Doctor Who and the guy from Wayne’s World 2. Ripley’s arc and ultimate sacrifice work, however the build up to this is totally unintelligible.
With Prometheus its tricky, whilst the writers will have a duty to the franchise as a whole, Ridley Scott doesn’t. Although he’d obviously be familiar with the first one, fans approach Prometheus based on a whole series of films, their expectation is totally different to what Ridley was making. Plus the hype for Prometheus did it no favours.
I wrote this here if you’re interested, http://whatculture.com/film/prometheus-the-gift-and-the-curse-of-alien.php
Great article, David.
As I said in the review above, I’m far more forgiving with Alien 3 than Resurrection, but that’s not to say it’s GOOD, or even decent for that matter. It’s really a mediocre experience, but with a surprisingly great deal of talent behind it. The casting may have been off, but the acting was still quite good, though my memory is fuzzy, and the time since I watched the film has been quite a while, so I may be off on that compliment.
People keep on touching on the subject of Lindelof’s writing chops, but Scott was in charge of the script as well, overlooking it’s progress, and could’ve put a stop to any misdoings at any time. He seemed to care more about his role in making the movie (directing) than the other parts, like writing.