1. Greek Myth – Prometheus, Mankind & Zeus
It would be unfair to start with anyone except the titan from Greek mythology who lends his name to the movie! My first introduction to the character of Prometheus was when ice skating in front of Paul Manship’s bronze statue at the Rockafeller plaza many, many years ago. Now, it seems, the eponymous Titan’s name is on everyone’s lips… For that reason Robert Graves, one of our greatest ever experts on the myths of Classical antiquity, would have been happy. It was Graves who gave me my real introduction to Prometheus and the myths and stories that surround him when, as a 21 year old graduate, I traveled the world with a dog-eared copy of his classic “The Greek Myths”.
In the beginning, you could say that things were going well between Zeus and Prometheus. Although Prometheus was the son of the titan Iapetus, he had proved pivotal in helping Zeus gain victory in the Titanomachy- the terrible War of the Titans- a tumultuous battle between those led by Zeus’s father Kronos, and the Olympian gods. The war culminated in Zeus dethroning his father and establishing his reign as the principal lord of Mount Olympus. Prometheus then helped in the birth of the goddess Athena, by holding open the head of Zeus as a fully-formed Athena came screaming out of the gaping hole in her father’s head. Suddenly though the relationship between Zeus and Prometheus went down hill fast…
According to Ovid in his Metamorphoses, Prometheus is credited with the creation of human-beings “in god-like image” from clay, and it is this story, in conjunction with the better known myth of Prometheus giving early man a push up the technological ladder by providing us with fire stolen from the workshop of Hephaestus, that provides the mythological and philosophical backdrop for the film. Zeus, almost-omnipotent leader of the Olympians, was not the kind of god to let transgressions go unpunished, and he reprimanded Prometheus terribly… For his treachery against Zeus and his repeated benevolence towards humankind he was chained to a mountain in the Caucasus, and an eagle was set to tear his liver from his abdomen every day.
The actual myth of Prometheus is brandished like a large bright shiny bracelet on the movie’s sleeve. Peter Weyland has named the spaceship that will transport the crew to ‘meet their maker’ in homage to the titan. And the movie harks back to the Prometheus myth over and over: the image of Prometheus’s liver being torn from his abdomen resurfaces repeatedly- i) in the key scene of Doctor Shaw’s ‘caesarean’, ii) with the Engineer giving birth to the xenomorph at the end of the movie, and iii) on the mural shown in the dome-like structure which shows an Engineer creating life in a pose showing a damaged abdomen…
This oft-repeated motif illustrates that genesis and self-betterment can only come through destruction and sacrifice. Likewise we see the action of Prometheus stealing from the gods replicated in David’s taking of the black liquid canister from the cave complex, and in Weyland’s all-consuming desire to obtain the secrets of eternal life from the Engineers.
You Might Also Like...
- Prometheus: 6 Answers To The Key Questions
- Prometheus: 20 Blunders That Ruined The Film
- 5 Prometheus Questions We Still Want Answered
Want to write about the stuff you're passionate about and have your work read by an audience of over 10 million a month? Click here to become a contributor.









45 Comments
What can I say? This and the Answers article have made my 2 hour airport delay interesting. They FRAZZLED MY BRAIN but they made it interesting! FANTASTIC! I think that you are far too clever for your own good at times and maybe cleverer than the writing team – or maybe the team are just geniuses and did incorporate all this stuff? The similarity you point out to the Norse eitr is very good and it seems too similar to be coincidence!
I need to go on a course or something to reinvigorate my brain as I picked up on none of this when watching the movie and I majored in English Lit. Very good stuff Mr Benji Taylor. What do the kids say amazeyballs?
Other than pretentiousness, is there a good reason to use the word “whilst” instead of “while”
Nothing short of epic! I am a massive Prometheus fan and I have read a lot of analysis on some of the forums like AVP, there is some whacky stuff out there, but this is the best analysis I have seen! I got some of this when I watched it (Prometheus of course, and the Pandora´s Box, even the Sumerian stuff) but there is a lot I missed and this- coupled with the great answers article part 1- leaves me feeling a lot more ¨in the know¨!
Hats off to you for the best Prometheus analysis on the web!
Also yes I would like to hear about your thoughts on His Dark Materials (up there with my favorite books of recent decades), if you can spare the time!
AC
These articles are the eventuality of an anomaly inherent in the scriptwriting of Prometheus which, despite Lindelof’s sincerest efforts, he has been unable to eradicate from what is otherwise a harmony of mythological precision!
@ Caligula,
Classic paraphrased ‘Architect’ line from Reloaded! Let’s hope that the Prometheus sequel doesn’t end up like Matrix Revolutions. That movie let me down…
Excellent read, have to agree with the other comments also, maybe if your educated pov was considered during the script writing process some of the analogies would have subtly seeped through as per the black elixir rather than being ‘face-hugged’ :) Really enjoying your insight as it actually feels you’re adding more gravitas to the screenplay.
Really looking forward to the final part of your exploratory trilogy :)
Many thanks
@ Stranded, @ Adam, @ KenShiro,
Thanks for commenting and for your very kind words. I am glad that you enjoyed the article.
@ Adam,
Initially I was going to include a section on His Dark Materials, but ultimately I didn’t mention it directly in the article because I wrote at relative length about Milton & Blake, and they were certainly 2 of Pullman’s biggest influences when writing his trilogy (I think he often cites Blake, Milton, & Heinrich von Kleist).
To be honest I would consider HDM a retelling of Paradise Lost in many ways- which is given away to some extent by the title (an extract from Paradise Lost Book 2: “Unless th’ Almighty Maker them ordain/ HIS DARK MATERIALS to create more Worlds…”). And Blake’s poetry is frequently cited in the headings to the chapters of The Amber Spyglass. They share a lot in common thematically- though HDM was better executed (of course they are different mediums, but still!)
A truly great set of books…
Benji, Not sure how to contact you but I have really enjoyed your take on Promethius. I just have a few questions that hopefully somebody can answer. Why did David infect the doctor with the black substance? Did he simply not like him? Did David want the female doctor pregnant? I guess overall I am having trouble understanding David’s motivation in some of his actions? Perhaps thats the point he is an andriod and we cannot fully relate to him? Thanks for your time!
In Christ,
Mason
Hi Mason,
Weyland basically tells David to “try harder” in terms of finding the solution to eternal life. He thinks the all of the Engineers are dead so needs to go down another avenue…
David therefore decides to use Holloway as a lab rat. In David’s estimations and calculations, the humans around him are not much more than rats and Holloway- with his comments about doing anything to get his answers- can be considered to be a willing test subject (from an android’s POV)…!
Once again a brilliant article!In fact it is one of the best articles i have read on Prometheus.So interesting.Tell me Benji,have you written any novels?If not i am looking forward to your first one! Fantastic work
Great stuff again. Loved it.
Your articles are being talked about on the forums too. Maybe drop in and say hi.
How about Old Testament references? Or Lovecraft? Your thoughts, as I saw you mentioned Lovecraft in your other articles? Ps- im the one who got your Yeats references the first time around :-)
Can’t wait for the final article. Out of interest will you be publishing one joint combined article to sum it all up? Perhaps you can write a book on Prometheus?! The lovers will buy it and revere you and the haters will buy it to burn it!
@ Caligula,
Thanks for commenting.
I would say that Lovecraft’s “At the Mountains of Madness” and the concepts that it explores are key to the Alien franchise as a whole.
The premise of ATMOF is VERY similar to Prometheus: a team of scientists >> remote world/ Antarctica >> discover ancient alien ‘gods’ who came to Earth millions of years ago…
The similarity is almost certainly the reason that Del Toro abandoned the project when he learned about the plot of Prometheus…
Regarding the Old Testament connections, I just think that the whole Old Testament image of Yahweh as a vengeful god whom you cross at your peril lends itself to the image of the Engineers as we see them in Prometheus.
As Kane points out in the comment below, some people have drawn a connection between Leviticus 2-23 and the moon LV-223. I think this could definitely be a deliberate parallel – with that verse in particular the idea is kind of ‘if we do not obey/ if we transgress… then we will be punished’ and it again lends itself to the Engineers as we know them… As does the whole of Leviticus, in that it’s basically about adhering to rules and rituals and, if those rules and rituals are broken, then breaching it compromises the peace between Yahweh (in this case the Engineers) and mankind.
I think after the 3 articles are published I will tie them all together in 1 document and post it on my blog. To be honest the first document that I wrote was basically a 10,000 word essay on Prometheus that explored the plot, the myth, and the themes, but I didn’t want to give my editor a heart attack, or bore people to death completely, so I suggested we split it over 3 articles, which seems to be working well!
The book- haha- well you never know! I am looking forward to writing about something other than Prometheus though… I am a massive Tolkien fan so expect some solid Hobbit articles soon…
Prometheus, The Dark Knight then The Hobbit. Quite the year for movies!
Nice! Fantastic article again mate, I especially enjoyed your mention of Eitr, Eitr was actually mentioned on the Weyland Industries website under resources, it happens to be the rarest resource…No coincidences there hehe. Also LV-223, perhaps Leviticus 22:3? “Say to them: ‘For the generations to come, if any of your descendants is ceremonially unclean and yet comes near the sacred offerings that the Israelites consecrate to the LORD, that person must be cut off from my presence. I am the LORD” Great stuff, I’ve actually reconsidered Prometheus as a masterpiece purely on its subtle mythological motifs, ambiguity and David’s performance alone. Oh yeah, not to mention the breathtaking visual grandeur. Keep them coming Benjii!
@ Kane,
Thanks for commenting. See my comments to Caligula above re. Leviticus.
Very interesting that the viral campaign made a subtle mention to eitr as a rare ‘mineral’. It’s a definite nod to them incorporating it into their inspiration for the movie! Great, I feel more vindicated in the parallels I have drawn in my analysis now.
Also I think the Sumerian mythological angle is further indicated by the markings on the stone head in the Engineer’s cave complex. They look like cuneiform inscriptions… Compare them to the cuneiform markings on Sumerian stone tablets for example…
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/91/Sumerian_26th_c_Adab.jpg/310px-Sumerian_26th_c_Adab.jpg
or…
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-4ZViJoRfDbg/Tj_3DyEeJhI/AAAAAAAAAjM/h849lRx20uc/s1600/cuneiform2.jpg
Great piece. Well written and very well thought out.
Can I ask your opinions on the Cavalorn piece?
@ AlienInJapan,
Thanks for commenting. You’re actually the second person in 24 hours to mention that piece to me.
I read it yesterday after someone else first drew my attention to it… apparently it’s been well well circulated amongst Prometheus fans!
Well, the first thing I would like to say is it’s a well written piece, and the gentleman who wrote it is obviously smart and well versed in his mythology and symbolism. I liked his style of writing.
However, I actually disagree with most of his interpretations; the conclusions that we drew from the movie were very different.
Key differences:
- He is a proponent of the ‘Space Jesus’ theory, and I am not. Ridley has been clever in that he seemingly denied and confirmed (as the same time!) the validity of this theory. I’d be horrified if they went down this route. It opens up a major can of worms and plot-holes. It’s also cliched. “A spaceman came travelling on his ship from afar… And ’twas light years of time since his mission did start!” No no no…!
- His interpretation presumes that the black liquid models its behaviour on the user’s mental state. I don’t buy that at all. The black liquid does its thing irrespective of how you feel about it, according to which variant you ingest. The Engineers are intensely corporeal and I doubt they would manufacture their key substance to be governed by thought, emotion and state of mind.
- He says the the liquid begins to engender new life and takes serpent-like form. I disagree here too. In this case the black liquid acts as an evolutionary expedient on an already existing lifeform, the LV-223 worms. They take on characteristics of the xenomorph (eg- acid blood) , resulting from the variant of the black liquid that they ingested. I agree that there may be intended symbolism with the serpent from Genesis but this life does not spring up from scratch.
- “Refusal to accept death is anathema to the Engineers”. I disagree again. In my mind this interpretation relates to the opening scene sacrificial Engineer only. You can see the Engineer struggling for his life at the end. He wants away, and fast!
- The interpretation that mankind’s crucifixion of Jesus led to the black liquid- on a moon light years away- developing some kind of space nasty to kill the Engineers is just too abstract, indefinite and far-fetched as far as I can see. What happened on LV-223 happened because one of the Engineers either messed up or acted deceptively (my theory relies on the latter).
This is not an attack on his well thought out piece. As I say it was well written and interesting to read, we just draw very different conclusions. But I do like the way that he cites the conflicting and yet complimentary interwoven themes of creation and destruction as being paramount to the narrative. Which I do agree with!
Interestingly the title of his analysis, which is a shout out to the legendary Percy Bysshe Shelley, is the same as the title of my initial review from 1st June:
http://benjitaylorwins.wordpress.com/2012/06/01/prometheusunbound/
A very interesting piece of analysis nonetheless.
I am with you in agreement totally. Cav was an interesting piece but the analysis was just too spiritual and ”esoteric” in terms of how the black goo functioned.
I totally agree with your series so far – in terms of answers and myths! I can’t wait for Part 3!
What I hope is that you will not only mention themes etc but include your opinion about how the themes are dealt with.
And I can’t wait for the amalgamated 10,000 word analysis. Keep up the great work Benji.
I’ll be sure to include my thoughts on the way that the themes were executed, in the article. Thanks.
I find myself drawn deeper and deeper into the whole mythological aspect of this movie by your articles and catch myself saying “this is brilliant” and “of course of course!”. What seemed “just a SF movie with pretentions” at first now seems like the most thought through bit of film I’ve ever come across. Doesn’t say much though, I’m a literary barbarian and might not have picked up on most of it if you hadn’t rubbed my nose in it.
Either you researched till you saw blue in the face for this article or I never dare to enter in a Star Wars quotation battle with you again since you are well schooled Sir.
Great work, great work.
Well written and a good read, basically it comes down to that mankind has and probably always will struggle with the same questions throughout history up to today and beyond why are we here and where do we come from. The very reason why we have religion and science. Tank you for taking the time to write this and previous, I actually enjoyed it more then the movie ;)
@ Ray, @ Anomandaris,
Thanks for the comments and I’m stoked that the articles have hit the right spot.
@ Anomandaris,
The comment about enjoying the articles more than the movie made me chuckle… “All that breaks must be discarded even as the thunder of faith returns…” Enjoy article number 3 when it’s up!
One quick comment, not totally related to what you’d said here: “The trick, William Potter, is not minding that it hurts.” This is very cleverly used, both in the sense that it illustrates the Promethean-theme of giving fire to man, and of course in this scene the man character extinguishes a flame. The other point is that it hints that David does mind hurtful things said to him, and here is given a license to ‘not mind’, or put otherwise, to pretend. Interestingly this is reinforced overtly when Halloway mocks him on a few occasions, asking why he is wearing a suit, not wanting a drink etc. and Shaw asks him what he wants? By the end of the film David has evolved enough to ask Shaw for something that he clearly wants – to be saved/resored. His words are interesting: “I want you to do something for me….”
@ Nick,
I agree that it may well be relevant that David says “I want” at the end of the film, especially as he has previously said “want, not a concept I’m familiar with…”
WOW. Not sure how I came across this, but very glad I did.
I just hope Ridley et al, do justice to this analysis and not cop out with a ‘hollywood’ themed sequel.
Maybe a phone call or two from you wol=uld help…
I was truly impressed at the amount of leads you picked up on here! The scope of the references is so broad, across different cultures taken in different aspects of historical time. This is the best article on the subject I have seen! A true pearle among other articles! This makes the movie look better than it is actually!
@ Ham, @ Pussycat,
Thanks for commenting. Glad you both loved it!
loved the film =)
Nothing new under sun.
@ Ham, I am glad you found this then!
@ Pussycat, @ GDG, also thanks for commenting.
Agreed that it’s great when a film comes along that allows us to peel away the layers and in its depths discover its secrets.
I may be going a little off topic, but it seems to me that we are all caught in agreements and disagreements. And therefore, unable to discover this thing called “human” . I think in order to discover something in such serious and deep discussion is the presence of humility.
This whole question of what is human, first of all, is completely conceptual since we, as a society is based on concepts/ideas. Where is the actual/factual HUMAN if we are caught in ideas of him?
Remember, we ourselves live on a planet, in a solar system with other planets and moons. So my question is where is this geography map with nationality/religion/culture in all of this? -and these are things that divide us all from one another. Therefore have been in conflict against one another for thousands of years. This society in conflict is simply the extension of the inner conflict of each human being and this inner conflict is the locality of this world in crisis. My point to all of this is that we all think that we are healthy, and yet we adapt ourselves daily to this sick society. Obviously, to me the human quality is not present if the quality of individuality is present. Maybe,being actually healthy means being cosmic. Maybe ” Christ” was simply a cosmic being. Yes he had a human body. But what was he psychologically? Consciousness, when not conditioned by society, remains cosmic and this state of inner conflict with fears is not present. Christ may have been simply a healthy”human. And the rest of us are still very sick and insane. Billions of us actually think that we live on a geography map with countries. A map is flat, and our planet is a sphere. So obviously our mind is not fitting with what actually is. My point to all of this is that we shouldn’t be questioning what was Chris, but we should be questioning our present state of being, what we are right now.
A fellow human,
Nicholas
Not sure if anybody said this already but having to do with your Prometheus and the bird ripping out the abdomen references. Surprised you didn’t point out how the ship looks like an eagle and it then crashes into the “belly” of the ngineer ship
@ Nicholas, thanks for commenting.
@ Sean, interesting point!
I can’t thank you enough for how happy I was to find your articles after jumping from forum to forum looking for news about the upcoming Prometheus blu ray.
I liked the articles so much that I ended up reading all of it the same night.
I looked for the mythological and religious connections in the movie
But I did not come out with the clear and deep connections your analysis has and I thank you for that.
After reading your articles is being very stimulating trying to decode the path “ myth or religion “ Ridley Scott is using to drive the narrative of this trilogy if it ever becomes a trilogy , one can only hope J
With that said I ask if you would indulge me in what I think is the religious narrative Ridley Scott is using to drive the trilogy by what I saw in Prometheus and you so cleverly point out in your articles.
In my view the Gods AKA Engineers in LV-223 are the “Fallen Angels” cast way from their home planet “Paradise” for elevating their creation the “xenomorph” a perfect weapon to a God like level as seen in the first mural after over coming the bio-genetic work done before, as seen in the second mural as an not so perfect xenomorph thus beginning the war in the havens-universe good vs. bad Gods vs. evil/xenomorphs.
I think the reason is the Gods feared their destruction by their newly created race. Why we see all the work done in LV-223.
David’s line: “doesn’t everyone want their parents dead”
He knows the Gods in LV-223 are in war with there parents.
As we see in the xenomorph that comes out the Engineer-God at the end of the movie perfection didn’t come from the “RIB OF GOD” as depicted in the second mural, but from the “Body OF GOD“. Xenomorph needed to grow from inside the Engineer-God thus becoming perfect and GOD-LIKE.
Then God said, “Let us make human beingsb in our image, to be like us”
with a perfect DNA match we are part of the tree of life that gives the xenomorph fruit.
No wonder why Ridley Scott in an interview call the engineers “Gardeners “we are one part of their crop with the xenomorph being the forbidden fruit.
In my view the Prometheus myth connection is the engineers that left the knowledge gave the knowledge to human back on earth by living the clues to where to find the fire the xenomorph in LV-223 the only weapon/fire that can bring destruction against the Gods. Also the connection to Jesus Christ is the last engineer on earth the last overseer of the crop on earth humans, after all these overseer had to maintain its crops grow it in numbers.
Then God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and multiply“ for the more humans the more xenomorphs, but after teaching us about the horrors of the Devil/xenomorphs and learning about are innocence even mating with their human-crop these overseer saw the humans as the perfect creation and not their weapon/xenomorph creation. This Engineer- Jesus sacrificed him self for the benefit of human kind by going back LV-223 giving birth to a xenomorph to be used against the engineers in LV-223 giving humans time to learn about the Gods.
The serpent/David said to the woman, “You surely will not die! 5“For God knows that in the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”
We know Mr. Scott has made some big questions and it’s trying show us the scientific and logical answers in are faces as depicted by religion and mythology accounts that throughout history comes across with many similarities and some how tell us the same things.
I hope I made some sense and didn’t just point de obvious.
Thanks for posting Renato, I am glad that you enjoyed these articles.
Interesting comments, though I don’t buy into the “Jesus was an Engineer” theory…
So from your article which I think was excellent you really have pulled it apart and noticed things I haven’t and have made me want to watch this film another few times. And from this article it would seem that Ridley scott and the writers that they want to get their point across that we shouldn’t be delving into these sort of things as a race. It would be interesting to hear their views on if they believe in a god or fallen angels creating us. Or wheather they just used these plots to make this story. I would like to know why Ridley Scott created alien in a sense I suppose. Does he feel that he needs to warm us in his own subtle way? Or is it just coincedental or just a use of plots to make a film?
Danny, cheers for posting your thoughts.
Hopefully we’ll hear more on Ridley’s thoughts on his Blu-ray commentary!
Should be “Samayza”, not “Samazya”.
Thanks for reading Tank… Samyaza is actually the best translation from Aramaic.
Benji,
A fascinating and elaborate set of conjectures to explain some of the many questions the film asks. The various references to human cultural and religious explanations of our own origins dovetail with the unknowns of the film. It’s obvious you spent a great deal of time thinking of assembling the pieces into something that could at least attempt to answer what some of us are asking. Reading what you said made me think of the modern movie environment, as well as Ridley Scott, the man who created the films holding up both ends of the narrative.
Movies are primarily designed as entertainment, and I dare say a vast majority of the movie going audience has no idea how Paradise Lost, Greek mythology, or Sumerian legends have anything to do at all with Prometheus. Many of them will dismiss your research and opinions as a bunch of metaphysical mumbo-jumbo. Modern movie audiences want action, a linear plot, and good effects-too much information just confuses them-hence the reaction from some “Alien” devotees. That said, on to what I really think.
I respect Ridley Scott enormously for what he’s done with Prometheus. He wanted to entertain, yet leave his audience thinking about what they had seen long after leaving the movie theater. In that he has succeeded. For people like you and me, this is some delicious brain food indeed. I’ve always wanted a good movie to tickle my brain as well as show me a good time. One of my all time favorites is “Forbidden Planet,” which surprisingly doesn’t have all that much action. Much of the excitement in this masterpiece exists in the imagination-the greatest science fiction implement of all.
This sort of thing is what separates Scott from other filmmakers (though he even he has made a few clunkers); his best movies always seem to have a thread of intelligence as well as mystery to them. For instance, “Gladiator” was entertaining, but contained a great deal of Roman history as well (with some artistic license, of course). We full know the history of Alien and Blade Runner, with the cult followings they have generated.
Prometheus has ventured into territory few filmmakers have gone period, let alone in today’s super-fast world of minuscule digital attention spans. “2001″ asked similar questions in 1968, and received a similar divided response from the general public. Like Kubrick, Scott follows his own drummer, and somehow got the money to make this movie in the first place. Considering the simplistic fare that rules cinema these days, that is pretty amazing.
In my mind, it says something about Ridley Scott’s imagination that he has somehow created not one, but THREE films that have developed a cult following. I also think it’s no coincidence that all three movies are science fiction. Scott’s films will never approach George Lucas’ box office numbers, but I’ve always felt an affinity for them. He has a kind of weird “twist” to him; he walks a line between dollars and creativity, and I’m glad the best results lean toward the latter.
Keep up the good work! Very thought provoking.
Rotwang, thanks for the detailed feedback, and for your comments- which echo my own sentiments!
Also Forbidden Planet- great old movie!
Dunno if anyone else mentioned this particular Christian imagery, but it really jumped out to me when Meredith walks in on David washing her father’s feet (as christ washed his disciple’s feet). Then, to redirect and flesh out the relationship, Weyland it seems considers David his perfect son, in contrast to the less-than Vickers. Smacks of Cain and Abel, where Abel as the second child is more favored (Abel potentially translating to breath or vanity). On interpretation holds that Cain merely made the atoning sacrifice, while Abel offered atoning sacrifice AND gratitude offering, thus finding favor with the Lord. CAin’s jealousy leads him to exodus, while Abel’s martyrdom makes him a predecessor of Christ.
A virgin birth? What film were you watching? Now I can’t help but question the accuracy of what’s already been mentioned and interpreted and what’s remaining…
Hi Anthony- thanks for commenting.
I am not really sure what your issue is with that statement- I state that those scenes have parallels with the New Testament… the operative phrase being ‘we have elements of…’ It does not state that they are a direct retelling of the New Testament scenes. Shaw was clearly not a virgin- but she was barren. That’s a miracle birth, albeit a warped and twisted one! And that miracle birth occurs at Christmas- hence elements and parallels of the virgin birth.
On another note I would encourage you to continue to question the accuracy of everything that you read- it stimulates good debate and discussion and keeps the brain ticking over:-)
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
I’m sorry but I struggle to see the parallel. Shaw was barren, sure. But the overwhelming majority of virgins are entirely capable of producing offspring, and just haven’t yet chosen to do so. So, which element of a virgin birth are you talking about? The miracle bit? That it happened on Christmas? It might parallel Christian mythology, but definitely not a virgin birth. Sorry, I’m just really picky when it comes to words.
On another note, perhaps the Christian mythology was a futuristic tale and the Virgin Mary was artificially inseminated? We’ll never know. That would be far from a miracle, nonetheless.
Being a Greek, a lover of our wonderful mythology, and an ardent fan of Prometheus, I wasn’t intent on seeing the film. I thought, Well, turning Greek mythology into a spectacular circus of inaccuracy and distortion is not exactly my cup of tea — but the more I read about the film, the more I’m curious to get into that movie theater and recognize for myself all the mythological and religious allusions.