
You will never forget your first trip into the animus, because you had never seen anything quite like it. Looking out on the shining rooftops of Damascus, Acre, and Jerusalem, just knowing that almost every texture was climbable. Those incredible graphics (that I would argue still hold up today) blending in with the masses of crowds, to eventually be interrupted by those pesky beggars. The combat, while clunky, was different, the time period was interesting, and you had a freaking hidden blade.
Saying that, the game often suffered the plague of repetitiveness and those clunky controls all too often got you into trouble (and man didn’t it seem like you couldn’t do anything without the guards being on high alert). And did you ever expect your Crusade assassin adventure was all taking place in the modern day? Cool, right? I guess not, since it doesn’t seem many people enjoyed this aspect of the game.
So clearly the game wasn’t perfect and in the end it was a game that either you loved, or you absolutely hated. With the next installment, it seemed Ubisoft aimed to change everyone’s mind about the series and that is exactly what they did.
Assassin’s Creed 2 took the interesting concept of the first game, improved on combat… and everything else. Basically it blew the first one out of the water! It introduced a highly likable character that would make future characters much harder to warm up to. It had one of the most expansive worlds ever created, not in size, but rather in all the character they programmed into each city. Florence was achingly beautiful, and how fun was it running around Venice during carnival with all the fire breathing jesters around. Couple all of that with some incredible missions, with equally incredible set pieces, and one incredible tale of revenge to go along with it. And let’s not forget Jesper Kyd’s amazing score that took the game and its emotion to new heights.
Dare I say this game is a masterpiece-okay, maybe I won’t go that far but it’s damn good! (Certainly in my top 5 favorites.) This game cemented the series as some of the best games around, however that all changed.
Rather than another two year hiatus between games, AC: Brotherhood was later revealed and was slated for release just a year after the remarkable second. It was a good game, it certainly didn’t match the precedent set by its predecessor, but that seemed near impossible. (As the franchise goes on it seems to be getting more and more impossible.) Brotherhood was set in Rome, it was sprawling and just as beautiful as past cities but felt much more restricted. You longed for those cities that rang with so much personality. The story was good, but was much shorter than the second. Recruiting Assassins and building up Rome was often tedious but a nice little extra, and it sure was cool seeing Ezio grow even more from the end of the second, and really rising through the ranks of the Brotherhood. It also put some much needed charm and weight into that dreaded present day story-line. In the end AC: Brotherhood was a good game, it didn’t have the remarkable changes the second did, but that was okay…until AC: Revelations was announced and would once again be releasing just a year after Brotherhood.
The big catch to this game was that it would be our dear friend Ezio’s last outing. Of course we want to see how his adventure ends, we had only been with him since birth! The game was going to take our hero to a new location, Istanbul, and introduce us to some interesting friends full of personality, like Yusif. Again, the game was good, not reaching the standards of Brotherhood, which means it certainly doesn’t match the standards of AC 2. The story was shortened once again, and this is where those extra features started to bloat a little bit. Protecting assassin dens from attacks was not much fun, luckily it could be easily ignored, and the economy became much more difficult to understand. It also seemed the series was headed toward all scripted over the top action packed missions, the likes of which are much more welcome and well done in something like the Uncharted series. They often make you feel like you are just going through the motions.
However, the worst part was how they treated the modern day story as nothing but little dialogue clips mixed in with portal-like block sequences. A real shame considering they could have turned it all around and made the haters like these parts of the game after its growth in Brotherhood. Basically, as the series goes on it feels less and less like the Assassin’s Creed we once knew.
Each entry seems to bring fans more and more disappointment. The only logical thing for Ubisoft to do would be to give this golden franchise a little time to get back on its feet again. Nope! Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag will be hitting the shelves in late October. The best part, they won’t even make this a highly anticipated launch title on the next generation of consoles. Instead this will be the sixth game of the series you can play on your PS3 or Xbox 360. (There will be a next-gen version of the game as well, according to Ubisoft it will sport slightly better graphics.)
This is just Assassin’s Creed madness! It needs to slow down before their much beloved franchise stops raking in the cash and they resort to running another great franchise into the ground. Click on too see the 5 reasons why the Assassin’s Creed series needs to take a break.
We are currently seeking Gaming contributors on WhatCulture. To find out more about the perks of being a Gaming contributor, click here.








26 Comments
Am I the only person who didn’t enjoy the missions on the Aquila in AC 3? I felt that the controls were bulky and the ship was annoying to move.
However, I’m very excited for the AC movie, having seen Embers and Lineage if it is similar to those two it has great potential. Seriously, I know that most video games turned into movies haven’t been great, but those to have been excellent in my opinion.
You are not alone. I liked the naval combat, but not to the extent where I want an entry in the series focused on it…maybe that is why I’m not so excited. In regards to the movie I really hope Ubisoft sticks to their guns and keeps the movie in the same vein as those were…I’m just afraid Hollywood will have too much of an impact and instead we will get a giant blockbuster trying to appease the typical movie goers, not fans of the game. (Ala Prince of Persia.)
I agree with you on the there not being enough time. After 2 (I’m pretty sure it was 2), Ubisoft promised that 2012 would be a break year for Assassin’s Creed and that a new release would be made for 2013 (could have been 2011, not 2012 my memory is sketchy).
In regards to the movie, Ubisoft has already confirmed they wish to expand the business into movie production on top of games, which means that it will be done centrally by Ubisoft. If Ubisoft is in control of the movie, I have faith that the final product will be directed to the video game fans.
I think video game movies shouldn’t exist, as they all give the series they are contributing to a bad name (RE, PoP, DoA).
If they really want to make a movie, make it like those AC movies, like Embers. It’s gotta be CGI.
No i love AC and i have not been disapointed yet so having more is not a bad thing
Naa, Im behind on the Assassins creed games, Im still on Revelations so when Ive finished that, 3 should be around £10 :)
And you won’t have to suffer those cliffhanger endings, by the time you get to AC4, AC5 will be announced and on its way. :)
Please, at the rate Ubisoft is going, it’ll be up to AC10.
Assassins Creed is a brilliant game series. I did have doubts about annual releases when Revelations was announced but now I think they’ve managed it quite well. Plus why is there so much hate against Assassin’s Creed 3, the only thing I thought it could have done better was Connor’s character which could have been developed a bit more.
Secondly concerning the Assassin’s Creed film. This will be a good film because it’s Ubisoft who will actually be making it and a third party distributing it (Like Marvel and their Cinematic Universe). The problem with previous video game movies is that they’ve been made be a third party who alter it a way that pleases them that often ruins the film.
I don’t hate AC3, really I don’t! In fact it was probably the game I played most last year, and I’m still playing the DLC. Also surprisingly enough I was a fan of Connors character.It certainly doesn’t deserve all the hate,I guess I was just let down after all the hype, and I needed a big refresher after Revelations.
You know, the truth is AC3 doesn’t deserve hate at all- the only reason why there are a minority of people and fans and critics hating on it is because the storyline and characters- to them it lacked depth. The American Revolution obviously is a good setting, but some didn’t like it, especially with the big gunplay involved. The setting, well some didn’t get it, due to some not knowing what the Revolution was, or some didn’t even know it existed. The characters- well everyone loved Achilles, Haytham and Charles Lee- but Connor really wasn’t much compared to them. He was always so quite, and angry, and rarely happy- it’s like he’s the 1700′s version of Kratos. But he is complex, rich and full of possibilities, and if you read the “Forsaken” book, you would understand it further. As for Desmond and the ending, well the AC series has always had endings like this, and people were looking forward to a happy ending, which didn’t happen. Its always explained in the next game though. Sure it had bugs and glitches, and a new, yet confusing control scheme that took some time to get to due to the freshness of it being a proper new installment, but these were really the only problems, nothing more. It was one of the best games i played this year, on level with Far Cry 3 and Mass Effect 3.
AC3 only gets as much hate as it does because it gets compared to AC2, as did Brotherhood and Revelations. AC2 set a benchmark which Ubisoft were supposed to beat in the subsequent games.
While AC3 is a good game in it’s own rights, it isn’t as good as AC2, which is what people were expecting, coupled with the confusing control scheme, means that people are angry at what could have been.
No one, the writer of this article included, is called AC3 a terrible game, but in the eyes of many fans it was a disappointment and deservedly so for all the aforementioned reasons (as well as reasons specified in the article, and in your own comment)
Finally, someone who still believes in AC!!!!!!!
My biggest problem with AC3 is the control scheme. The first four AC entries used the exact same control scheme with very few changes from entry to entry. I can’t imagine why they decided to completely switch it around for the fifth game in the series, but I gave up playing after about 8 hours of gameplay because I still hadn’t gotten used to the new controls, and died continuously as a result.
Not having to press X while free-runnning anymore…I can’t count the number of times that got me into trouble.
So did I. I died at least 10 times in the first couple of hours.
This is one of the best articles I’ve read on this subject. I’ve loved AC since day 1 and I love all of them, but I’m getting bored with it. Between AC3′s Connor barely feeling like an assassin and the modern-day story feeling tacked on and half-assed, I’m just not excited about it anymore.
Thank you for the kind words! I feel the same (obviously.) I just want a game focused on the Creed where you feel like an assassin again. All the games have been great, and I’m sure the new one will be on par. I just want them to come less frequently. It would give me time to really get excited for the game. This just seems way too fast.
Really great article. I agree on everything said, Assassins Creed is starting to suffer from diminishing returns and even though it is one my favourite game series I do fear that it’s beginning to decline in quality, probably Revelations was where it started to feel a bit stale. You’re absolutely spot on with the time issue, Ubisoft could of waited until late 2014 on next gen console for the next installment of the series, apparently they couldn’t. Assassins Creed 2 is many peoples favourite installment of the series, maybe Ubisoft should take the time to really listen to what fans want.
Thank you!I really thought they would wait until next-gen consoles. It doesn’t make much sense NOT to wait. I just really want them to take time on a new entry, not be working on it side by side with another. They were well into production of AC4 before AC3 was released, it gives them no time to see what fans liked and didn’t like about AC3.
seriously..who plays these terrible games..i tried to play 1 but it was so terrible i stopped an hour in…it’s nothing but a hitman knock off that thinks it’s artsy because it takes place in the past…so over these lame incarnations every year.
…I play these terrible games. (:
GET OFF THIS PAGE!!!!!
I wrote this article on my blog on IGN and love to see what think about it. It’s quite the opposite of what you’re saying actually it’s why I think we should be excited for more AC
http://www.ign.com/blogs/mayz05/2013/03/18/why-we-should-be-excited-for-assassins-creed-iv-black-flag/
Excellent read! Very good points you bring up! I have become a little less cynical about AC4 since writing this article…a little. :)
Excellent read!Very good points you bring up! I have become a little less cynical about AC4 since writing this article…a little. :)