9. Co-Op
Three characters, one game, six huge heists of the back of the greatest GTA mission in Three Leaf Clover; It would be silly not to wouldn’t it? Well Rockstar aren’t too fussed about how silly you think they are, it just isn’t happening.
But with the Multiplayer being ‘compelling’ and important to Rockstar, I wouldn’t worry too much about the lack of all things coop when it comes to the single player. Plus there is also DLC which Dan Houser (writer of GTA V and all that have come before) has been quoted as saying ‘we have some great ideas for’. Let’s just get the game out first, aye, Dan?
Want to write about the stuff you're passionate about and have your work read by an audience of over 10 million a month? Click here to become a contributor.
17 Comments
Same here dude!
Zombies DLC for Los Santos would be amazing
I disagree with the zombies,simply because GTA’s influence comes from the realism of it, but most of these choices are not bad, but it seems there are a lot of stuff u left out, like maybe driving submarines full of passengers, customizing cars as much as need for speed, REAL CAR BRANDS, Dating, Alot of sports, Beach parties, manual cars lol, a big variety of guns, gun customization, and also i disagree with there being cheats at the start of the game… maybe you can finish the game’s story then enable cheats…. and also jumbo planes like in GTA SA :D
I can see a “Zombies” DLC for Grand Theft Auto V. If Rockstar Games is going to be as “interesting” with their DLC as they’ve said, I could see weapons packs, zombies, multiplayer modes, maybe even story packs – look at RDR and MP3 for an insight on what their most likely going to do with some of Grand Theft Auto V’s DLCs.
Everyone loves zombies. I think zombies in LS would be amazing. Just imagine running from hordes of the undead through the lonesome desert or down the freezing mountains.
“On 30 October 2012, Take-Two CEO Strauss Zelnick suggested that Rockstar has ‘a lot of interesting stuff’ planned for GTA V’s DLC, but that it was “way too early” to begin discussing it.” Seeing as how this was said a day before Halloween, I like to imagine they were thinking of demons or spirits or ghosts or ZOMBIES when they thought of a great dlc idea.
This is not call of duty. We don’t need any zombies in it. Even in san andreas, the least realistic of all gta’s that would have killed it. You’d rather have mindless zombies running around trying to hit you vs police sharpshooters, helicoptors and the damn army after you? Sounds like someone is too bad to last a shootout with the cops and wants to take the easier road instead.
Nope I wouldn’t rather have it to the realism of GTA, just a bit of zombies on the side never hurt any game. And there is not a refrence to COD, I was thinking more of the excellent Undead Nightmare. Plus, it was only really a joke to add it in the article, I’m just trying to waste the hours until the actual game is released!
Who loves Orange Soda?
You for got one:
1/2. No March or Spring release (try October)
Agreed, with their track record ‘spring’ release is massively optimistic.
Y’know, I think the Zombies would be a good idea. Yes, it would take the realism from it but, bare in mind it most generally would be optional DLC so put simply, if Zombies ain’t your thing then don’t buy it.
DLC in most cases is made to extend a games replayability after completion (Not that GTA V will need much encouragment to be replayed)
Personaly, when it comes to DLC I think this is where game developers should be more creative, think about it, a lot of games out now and released say 5 years ago all tend to be quite simular, i.e. a lot of FPS’s, open-world game’s and RPG’s, there’s not a lot out there that is really innovative or original and this is because it’s so expensive to take a risk and develop a new IP that may or may not be a hit, so, I think any DLC to a game should offer different type’s of play options, rules, look, feel, control….Everything really, I mean, if a developer is adding ‘expirimental ideas’ to DLC then it DRASTICLY cuts the cost of redevelopment since the game already exists, therefore, we the players get great variety of DLC options (and as a result, if the quality of DLC increases then players won’t feel robbed buying a game at full price and then paying extra for additional content) and the developers get valuable feedback on what ideas may be a potential hit therefor increasing the likelihood that the developers may take bigger risks in future with brand new IP’s.
Just my two cents for ya…….My last two cents at that! :/
I can’t wait. I’m so pumped for this game!
If you want zombies in a sandbox game, just play Saints Row 3.
No dating, please, no dating
I’d imagine any Zombie material for GTA V would be as DLC someway down the line, how long after RDR did Undead Nightmare come out?
Despite the delayed release date, I’m still like a kid on Christmas morning. All I have to decided is which to play first to fill the time, RDR or GTA SA?
Go with both, you certainly have the time!
I don’t see why people are so adverse to Zombies, not asking for a tacked on story or anything, just a cheat code that changes NPC’s to the walking undead.
Besides, the zombies in SR3 just didn’t have the right gameplay to pull it off; Dull environment, zombies die from melee, nutshots, being slapped by dildos etc.
With TWD: Survival Instinct being such a dissapointment, any opportunity to see the undead implemented well is always great, in CoD the zombies are just unarmed enemies that absorb more bullets.
Of course, I’m not dead set on it, and would be happy to see them devote their resources to great DLC, just annoyed by the scornful dismissal of the idea as some gimicky add on.