10 Common Criticisms WWE Don’t Deserve Blame For
Can one ever have "too much" wrestling?
Vince McMahon is wrestling's equivalent of the devil and WWE are a money-grabbing monopoly more concerned with undermining their fanbase and forcing their agenda down everyone's throats.
That's a popular narrative, but it's not strictly true. Think about it: as much as some things iWWE do occasionally suck (that 50/50 booking and those overly-scripted promos, for example), does it really make sense that a business geared towards making as much money as possible would purposefully set out to p*ss off those feeding company coffers?
No, it doesn't, and there's a reason behind everything. They might not be satisfying enough excuses to those who yearn for better, but that shouldn't leave WWE open to attacks just for the sake of it. As shocking as it may sound coming from a writer who, in the past, has lambasted them, WWE do more good than bad.
McMahon is hardly an easy target. His skin is thicker than that of rhinoceros, and he's not the kind to be pushed around. Still, he (and his juggernaut as a whole) don't always merit the common criticisms hurled his/their way...