10 Reasons Vince McMahon And Triple H Don't Deserve Their Payrises
Who thought giving these guys more money was a good idea?
The news this past week that top WWE executives such as Vince McMahon and Paul Triple H Levesque received substantial hikes in salary came as a bit of a surprise to those who follow the business of the wrestling world, although it probably shouldnt have. Its always been an industry that is built on the backs of the men and women in the ring while fattening the pockets of the promoters to a disproportionate degree. The increases in salary are as follows: Vince McMahon From $1.184 million to $1.25 million Triple H From $550,000 to $577,500 Kevin Dunn From $825,000 to $866,250 Georgia Barrios (CFO) From $700,000 to $728,000 Michael Luisi (WWE Studios) - From $600,000 to $624,000 One thing to note: while Hunters pay seems out of balance to the other people listed, he likely also draws a separate salary as a talent and has the benefit of merchandise sales to pad that income. But is there any justifiable reason why any of these people should experience a rise in their earnings after the disastrous recent run the WWE has had, especially those on the creative end of things namely Vince and Triple H? After all, this is a company that posted a loss of $30 million in 2014. Were going to go in-depth and examine ten reasons why they dont deserve the added income. And none of them involve pushing Roman Reigns or burying Daniel Bryan.