10 WWE Decisions Fans Hated That Were Best For Business

We don't always know what they are doing, but they certainly do.

Daniel Bryan Triple H
WWE.com

Hands up if you've never been annoyed by a booking decision made by WWE? If you have your hand in the air right now, you are more than likely lying. Either that or you are actually Vince McMahon, and even then I'd wager that you weren't being entirely truthful.

The truth is we've all questioned the creative decisions made by WWE at some point in our fandom. Every now and then things happen in front of the cameras that draw cries of 'they don't know what they're doing', along with allegations of insanity in the booking department and claims that the company is out of touch.

I'd argue the contrary. WWE knows exactly what it is doing. Okay, maybe not all of the time, but more often than not. WWE is simply too big a company to make decisions to spite itself and generally makes moves that it thinks are, yes, best for business, because WWE is all about just that; business. We the audience might not know what they are doing, but WWE the company more than often knows just what it is doing.

Here are 10 times we as fans hated a creative decision made by WWE, only to see those decisions turn out to be best for business.

Advertisement
Contributor
Contributor

Born in the middle of Wales in the middle of the 1980's, John can't quite remember when he started watching wrestling but he has a terrible feeling that Dino Bravo was involved. Now living in Prague, John spends most of his time trying to work out how Tomohiro Ishii still stands upright. His favourite wrestler of all time is Dean Malenko, but really it is Repo Man. He is the author of 'An Illustrated History of Slavic Misery', the best book about the Slavic people that you haven't yet read. You can get that and others from www.poshlostbooks.com.