Despite the fact that WWE's Hall of Fame is privately curated, it's still the most prestigious and visible in the sport. That said, how WWE decides who goes in and when is not exactly a transparent process, and that's led to questions about the Hall's legitimacy. It was clearly a political tool, the gripes went; after all, how could any so-called wrestling Hall of Fame be taken seriously without this star or that legend included? It's a valid concern - but things have improved.
In recent years, the Hall has inducted many of the biggest names that really couldn't be justified for exclusion. But even with Randy Savage, Ultimate Warrior, and Bruno Sammartino taking their place, there are still plenty of deserving stars that should really be inducted already. What's more, the scope of the Hall has grown a lot since it first began back in the 1990's, and it now includes wrestlers who didn't compete in WWE - and even a celebrity wing. That means there's an even wider number of people deserving of membership than before - some of them very overdue.
Since WWE's determination process is so opaque, you'll also find speculation regarding why the legends in question have - at least so far - been snubbed.