Should WWE Have Saved Brock Lesnar Vs The Undertaker 3 For WrestleMania?

Debate: Did WWE panic and pull the trigger too soon?

Brock Lesnar's appearance on Raw this week wasn't exactly the hot segment it should have been. It raises the question if October's entire Lesnar / Undertaker narrative is too forced. Would the creative and anticipation for the match have been higher if it had been left for a few months until WrestleMania 32? Fans are now possibly having to make do with Braun Strowman versus The Undertaker at Mania. You can read more about that here. That's not a match anybody wanted, and it makes you wonder if WWE have simply panicked over Raw ratings and chucked away what would have been a major match for Lesnar and Undertaker at WrestleMania. Leaving it to April would have helped to build tension, and it would definitely have been the type of marquee headliner that Mania could have marketed itself upon. Sure, they screwed the feud up this summer, but in the commercial mainstream sense it would have still performed strongly next April. Two huge names like Lesnar and Undertaker are what Mania is all about. Instead we'll get it at Hell In A Cell, and although just a few weeks away, it doesn't feel as exciting as it should. Is it the October placement? Is it too soon after their last match? Have your say in the comments and share on social media. Should WWE Have Saved Brock Lesnar Vs The Undertaker 3 For WrestleMania?
WWE Writer

Grahame Herbert hasn't written a bio just yet, but if they had... it would appear here.