5 Reasons Why The Amazing Spider-Man Is Better Than Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man
5 reasons why the new Spider-Man is more amazing than the last.
1. Andrew Garfield Is A Better Peter Parker
Advertisement
Tobey Maguire was definitely a very brave actor for taking on the Spider-Man role when he did. In todays environment of Dark Knights, Green Lanterns, X-Men and assembled Avengers, its hard to imagine a time when comic book films were considered a gamble for a young actor. The 2002 Spider-Man film spent 25 years in development hell, and when things finally got moving at Sony, studios executives where very hesitant to hire Raimis first choice of Maguire. The baby-faced actor was considered something of a nobody and was in competition against the likes of his better known peers Leonardo DiCaprio, Freddie Prince Jr and a post-Knights Tale Heath Ledger. No one except Raimi wanted to see Maguire as Peter Parker, but they held to their guns and he turned out a performance in strong alignment with the comics. That being said, Andrew Garfield is a much stronger performer. His take on Parker is more in keeping with how youd expect a 17-year-old modern geek to be. Garfields Parker doesnt sit in his room weeping and hiding inside lockers at school, he has a level of personality, charm and heart. Parker still gets bullied, he still has no friends, and he is still a massive science nerd, but Garfield portrays it with a level of panache. It has always been a hard sell that Maguires mega dweeb would grow to such a powerful and confident superhero, but Garfields Parker feels as though in another life he could have been born into this position. The thing that sells Peter Parkers transformation as believable is that he had this hero within him all along, this ability to do great things; Maguire still looked weak even in the spider suit, whereas Garfield wears it well.