In Cinemas: EDGE OF DARKNESS review
Seven years. Thats a fair gap of screen time for one of Hollywoods sometime demented but still favourite sons, and director Martin Campbell, plays with that for just a couple of minutes, only allowing us Mel Gibsons growl in voiceover before he finally turns to face camera. And well, he may be a little older, a little craggier, but after seven years behind a film camera and in front of the tabloids it doesnt seem that Mel Gibson has lost any of his screen presence. Whether thats because his performance carries all that real world baggage is hard to say. Edge of Darkness is based on the BBC series from 1985, a six episode environmental pollution, conspiracy drama that proved to be a benchmark for intelligent, atmospheric film-making and the BBC are once again involved in squeezing the original into the film version, moving the story across the Atlantic to Boston, Massachusetts. In its American guise Gibson play Tom Craven, a Boston PD detective who suffers a cataclysmic loss when his only daughter is gunned down beside him. Seemingly collateral damage in an attack on Craven himself. A reserved (yes you read that right) man alone, Craven embarks on a single-minded, and possibly unbalanced search for the killers of the one bright point in his life, finding himself in the midst of a larger conspiracy involving industry, politics and government. Naturally in any adaptation of a mini-series to movie the erosion of some of the depth and detail is inevitable, I mean how much slow-burn tension and complexity can you compress, but Edge of Darkness ultimately and practically misunderstands, or simply ceases to care, about such things. There is a degree of success with the re-working of the central idea, particularly regarding its re-location but an over-reliance on action to keep the story in motion leaves the quiet moments, well, a little too quiet. Considering Campbell also directed the original series it makes these frustrating failures all the more prevalent. Then again within the confines of a two hour running time Campbell has ever been a middle of the road director, yes 007 rose from the ashes in Casino Royale but Ive always suspected that film succeeded in spite of its director. He doesnt seem to have the skill to pace or balance the complexity of conspiracy on the big screen, falling back on the shock troops of action, blood and violence.