Review: SAW 3D
rating: 2.5
Advertisement
New gimmick, same old claptrap with a bonkers ending. After six years, seven films and countless loony plot twists, the Saw series has finally come to what appears to be its end. Following the disappointing box office performance of Saw VI last year (which, despite being surprisingly good, was trounced by the far superior Paranormal Activity), the projected plots of two subsequent sequels have been truncated into one awkward, messy, barmy, series-capping finale, in Saw 3D. Saw VI rather successfully set the scene for the final battle over Jigsaw's (Tobin Bell) legacy between his wife, Jill (Betsy Russell) and the new Jigsaw, Detective Hoffman (Costas Mandylor). Saw 3D has a desperate Jill turning to the police to capture Hoffman, while Hoffman offers the cops a tempting deal; if they hand Jill over to him, he guarantees that Jigsaw's murderous rampage will stop. Meanwhile, self-help guru Bobby Dagen (Sean Patrick Flanery), who has made a career out of exploiting his surviving one of Jigsaw's traps, is the focus of Jigsaw's latest game; he has an hour to make his way through several traps to get to his wife, though as ever, things are not what they seem. Despite the law of diminishing returns finally hitting the series hard, there has been a massive air of doubt about whether Saw 3D is really the "final act". Though one wouldn't put it past the unscrupulous writers to flog a dead, mutilated horse beyond flagellation (as if that hasn't happened already), there is a certain finality to the film's events (namely the batshit crazy ending), suggesting that yes, finally, the Saw saga has come to an end. Unsurprisingly, though, the addition of some pretty uninspired 3D fails to bring flavour to this bookending instalment, and save for the nutty climax, this is the most generic and stilted entry in the series behind the dire fifth film. The sense of self-deprecatory, self-aware humour present in the sixth film implied a knowing new direction for the series to see its way out, yet it is strictly self-serious business as usual here, relying on a procedural "previously on Saw" flashback format, complete with a lazy investigative plot, and most depressingly, overly familiar traps that only occasionally satisfy. The opening trap - in which two young men trapped in a love triangle must choose whether to fight over a duplicitous floozie or walk away and let her die - is silly enough in its tacit sense of "morality" that it suggests a continuation of the sixth film's kitschy tone, but the blood-letting becomes increasingly generic in form, eventually devolving into abandoning invention entirely and resorting to tiresome slasher tactics.