Newcastle United MD Derek Llambias Says Name Change Will Bring In New Striker

By Matt Holmes / November 10, 2011

"I would hope it would generate between £8 million and £10 million a year. That would give us another player. The club needs to be self-sufficient, and this will help us be self-sufficient. "Yes, we do need to go that one step further to compete. Yes, we do. We have had an exceptional year, and long may it continue, but the fans want us to buy more players. "We need to bring in a striker in January, we will need replacements in the summer and we need to give ourselves as much as possible.

I agree, we do need to bring in a new goalscorer in January to help us push for a European place in January... but what happened to the £35 million for the transfer of Andy Carroll that hasn't yet been spent? He continues;

"There is no guarantee we will find a sponsor between now and then, but we have to give ourselves the opportunity and this is one. "We have to keep going at it. We can't just say 'Oh, it hasn't worked out, let's go back to what we were'. We have to give ourselves the maximum opportunity to sell it. "I totally respect the tradition and history of the club. That is always going to be there, but we need to move with the times and this is progression. "We need to move on. We are not disrespecting our fans at all. Far from it. We are trying to make it affordable and put players on the pitch. "We have exhausted all our other revenue streams, retail is not good - that produces next to nothing, quite honestly - so we need to bring in more, quite honestly.

Next time you put down your £40 to buy the Newcastle United third kit for a team that isn't currently in Europe and hasn't been for several years, just remind yourself that creates 'next to nothing' for Newcastle United. Just remember that. Just remember it when you have three new shirts, likely with SPORTS DIRECT plastered all over them next season. He goes on;

"We have been out there a long time looking. We lose Northern Rock as a sponsor this year, so it gives me a very small window to get a new shirt sponsor and hopefully a stadium sponsor at the same time. "We understand that side of it (fan resistance to referring to the ground by any other name), but it is the sponsor's responsibility, as well as ours, to move forward. Time will dissolve that. "The history will always be there, we just become part of the history or they become part of the history. We just need to make sure we give ourselves the opportunity. "You know Chelsea has come out to basically say they are going to re-name their present stadium. Now, they have a long history as well, but they have an owner who actually has more money than God. "We can't compare ourselves to Abramovich, we have not got that sort of money, so if we want to compete with the big boys, we have to bring more money in."

So as we said last night when the story was breaking... it's progress at a price. Whoring out the name of our beloved stadium for the price of a new player every season. One solitary new man to make up for the mistakes of bad signings in our history when we did have the money and spent it poorly. And once again we arrive at the question that we've had all summer. The £35 million for Andy Carroll was supposed to pay for a new striker, wasn't it? That money was supposed to be re-invested on the pitch, wasn't it? If we do sell the naming rights in the next few months and get that cash injection, the only way it will truly be spent is if we buy two or three players worth £8 million in January. That's the only progress that will somewhat be justifiable.