5 Reasons Why Pacific Rim Isn't Actually That Good

By Joe Butterfield /

3. The Film Is Laughably Cliché

This whole film is very formulaic. It sticks to stuff that€™s been done hundreds of times before and it suffers because of that. There€™s no real originality with the plot and it just makes the whole thing pretty bland. We all knew that the Mako was going to become a pilot. We all knew that, as soon as the old Australian went out of commission, the Commanding Officer was going to help pilot the Jaeger. We all knew they€™d sacrifice themselves to plant the bomb. Again, I could go on. When you can pretty much guess everything that€™s going to happen in the film€™s plot, it€™s not a good sign. Some would call it a pretty bad sign. Some would call it just awful. Nobody€™s asking for Inception levels of originality but we€™d at least like something a bit less obviously cliché. Of course, there€™s a common argument that has sprung up when others have criticised this. €œIt€™s all on purpose, Del Toro is paying tribute to action blockbusters and cliché stuff is all part of that!€ This excuse doesn€™t really pass with me. Just because a plot is predictable on purpose doesn€™t make the predictability a good thing, it€™s still bad. If this film had been done by, say, Michael Bay, then there€™d be a lot of critics absolutely panning the lacklustre storyline, regardless of how good the action is. Del Toro seems to get a free pass just because he€™s acknowledged to be a good director and it doesn€™t really make any sense to me. What€™s worse is that he€™s held in high regard for it, with people actively praising how good he is at regurgitating old formulas.