David Lynch's bizarre INLAND EMPIRE

By Robert Beames /

David Lynch and collectors of Blu-Ray discs, 2006€™s €˜Inland Empire€™, with its homemade, lo-fi aesthetic is probably not the most obvious choice for the hi-def treatment. €˜Blue Velvet€™, €˜Mulholland Drive€™ or €˜Eraserhead€™ may have been more obvious candidates to join last year€™s release of €˜The Elephant Man€™ on the format, but rather than any of those accepted classics of the Lynchian oeuvre, we instead have a film which is dangerously close to self-parody. The film seems designed to provoke cries of €œhow bizarre€: yes, a group of prostitutes talking about how nice their breasts are, before launching into a rendition of €œthe locomotion€ in unison is definitely a weird sight. If Lynch is simply in pursuit of unexplained images and unusual moments, then this film is an unqualified success. But for people who actually want to watch a film and not a three-hour art-house installation, it doesn€™t really hold any interest. €˜Inland Empire€™, so it goes, was largely improvised €“ made on a scene by scene basis, with Lynch and his stars (Laura Dern, Jeremy Irons and Justin Theroux) not knowing how the story would pan out. In theory this could create something fresh and interesting, but instead we have a disjointed and overlong film with some interesting moments and an impressive central performance from Dern (who goes through as many unhinged extremes of emotion as Charlotte Gainsbourgh in last year€™s €˜Antichrist€™), but lacking the feel of any overall drive or purpose. Throughout the film the line between dream and reality, fact and fiction, is blurred and this is achieved really well (as you would expect from Lynch), but when you have no connection to the story or the characters then it is hard to care which domain you are in. There are also some funny moments to enjoy in €˜Inland Empire€™: the brief scene in which Jeremy Irons directs a stagehand to move a prop is really good, with Irons held in one tight close-up as he gives the same instruction repeatedly, growing ever more exasperated. There are also some jumpy moments and some good dialogue, but three hours of moments like this would still be too much (and most of the moments are nowhere near this good). As earlier stated, €˜Inland Empire€™ (Lynch€™s first film shot on digital video) is not the typical Blu-Ray release movie. It is not with a mind that Blu-Ray is only worthwhile for the likes of €˜Iron Man€™ and €˜The Dark Knight€™ that I say this, for the likes of art-house fodder such as €˜Antichrist€™ and €˜The White Ribbon€™ have had splendid releases on Blu-Ray. But nothing about the photography of €˜Inland Empire€™ seems to warrant the treatment. It is deliberately amateurish looking at times and has a certain DIY quality to its production with the film being captured on low-res DV camcorders. As such the movie can never be seen in true HD, which makes this Blu-Ray release seem faintly pointless, especially for those who already own the DVD. In terms of features, the Blu-Ray has the same features: five interviews with David Lynch, the longest running at 26 minutes and the shortest at just 6. To the credit of Optimum Releasing, these features (for what it€™s worth) are all in high-definition, unlike those on many Blu-Ray releases (including Optimum€™s own disappointing release of €˜The Last Emperor€™ also out this week and reviewed at OWF). It is nice to see the features given the hi-def treatment that should, by now, be a standard for the format. However, in every other regard €˜Inland Empire€™ is far from being an exceptional Blu-Ray release. €œInland Empire€ on Blu-ray is available in U.K. at Amazon.

Advertisement