Rear Window
"Weve become a race of Peeping Toms. What people oughta do is get outside their own house and look in for a change." - Stella, Rear WindowRear Window is considered by many to be Alfred Hitchcock's most accomplished film. I can certainly see why people would argue that. Personally, I would trump for the deepness of Vertigo, the genre bending of Psycho, the thrilling entertainment of North by Northwest and the wickedness of Shadow of a Doubt as being more inspirational and more rewarding on multiple viewings, but there's little doubt that Rear Window is a true masterpiece. The movie stars Hitch's favourite thesp James Stewart as Jeffries, a guy who frequently dodges death living as an award winning photographer who puts his work before his own well-being in dangerous situations. Of course that kind of lifestyle can only lead to one conclusion and it's soon that he finds himself confined to a wheelchair with one of his legs castrated. In an attempt to overcome the tedious boredom of being stuck in the claustrophobic space of his apartment, Jefferies spies on his neighbours by looking out of his window into the apartments of others and taking keen interest in their lives.
Advertisement
Much has been said about Rear Window being a metaphor for the movie spectator and I believe there's enough evidence to support such a case. As Rear Window is entirely from Jefferies point of view, we are confined to our own chairs, forced to see whatever it is Jefferies sees when he looks through his binoculars into the window to other peoples apartments. His voyeuristic behavior is a way for him to forget his own problems and focus on the pitfalls of others as a means to escape what is going on with his own life. As Jefferies uses the binoculars for most of his spying, the effect is a darkened rim around the frame of the windows and with our lead character always lurking in the shadows, the effect this projects is of sitting in a darkened theatre voyeuristically watching whats on screen.
Advertisement
He is much more interested in the murder mystery film that is taking place directly across from his apartment, interestingly depicting a man who murders his nagging wife. It's something he can relate too and that takes up the most time of his window shopping. Hitchcock does suggest a problem with taking pleasure in watching the lives of others and dumping your problems onto them and that's the truth that we have no control on the images that come back to us. If we are aligned with a certain character and we are looking for a way for them to resolve their problem but they are killed off mid-way through the film, then the total shock and jolting effect soon turns our pleasurable desire into a nightmare. This can be seen in the film when Lisa is in Thorwalds apartment, he can only watch as a useless spectator, and is not able to save her from his grasp as he is confined to the wheelchair of his apartment.
Advertisement
Its certainly interesting that the only sexual pleasure that Jefferies receives apart from his own looking outside of his apartment window, is when he can watch Lisa get excited about his voyeurism and when she joins him in his dark obsession. The only excitement that Jefferies can stimulate for Lisa throughout the film is when he can voyeuristic spy on her as a pawn of his obsession as she wanders over into Thorwald's apartment. I would argue this as being a defining message of Hitchcocks whole cinema, as later in the directors work he would famously put his actresses such as Tippi Hedren and Janet Leigh in horrific and deadly situations for him to spy on with his film camera and then re-watch on the screen. Of course, one aspect of voyeurism is that a certain pleasure comes with the constant looking at an object of pleasure that is out of your reach and something you can never have. Although Im certainly not arguing that Hitchcocks desire for Hedren, Leigh or Grace Kelly came from a desire for an affair from his personal marriage, I would argue that they were objects of desire for him that he knew were out of his reach and the pleasure he gained from filming them was that he could watch them behind his camera and screen. rating: 5
Advertisement
A cinematic masterpiece which on paper should have been a disaster. Handled by the genius that is Alfred Hitchcock, he elevates a simple story into a complex tale of masculinity, relationships and fantasy whilst also playing around with innovative cinematic techniques and storytelling. A movie that is so finely tuned, it's impossible to pick faults with it.