12 Reasons You're Wrong About King Richard III

By Chris Waugh /

6. It Has Never Been Conclusively Proven That He Killed The Princes In The Tower

Okay so this is one area where King Richard III cannot fully be absolved of blame - although it has never actually been proven that he orchestrated the murders of the so-called "Princes In The Tower". The €œPrinces In The Tower€ - or brothers King Edward V and Richard Duke of York - were believed to have been murdered in one of the most-notorious royal scandals in British history. Following Edward IV€™s death, Lord Protector Richard, Duke of Gloucester (latterly Richard III), had been appointed to watch over the brothers - but for whatever reason instead he decided to lock them in the Tower of London. Edward V was 12 and Richard Duke of York just nine when they were imprisoned - supposedly to protect the former until he was ready to assume the throne - but Richard III instead stole power. Myth and legend still surround exactly what happened to the boys, although it is known they disappeared around 1483 - when the murders are believed to have taken place - and their bodies were not found until workmen dug up a wooden box containing two skeletons in 1674. Although King Richard III is a possible murder candidate, several other suspects exist - and it has never been proven who committed the acts. Other suspects include Henry Stafford, 2nd Duke of Buckingham (Richard III€™s right-hand man); King Henry VII (who executed many rival claimants to the throne when he seized power in 1485); Margaret Beaufort, Henry VII€™s mother (for the supposed same reason as him); and Jane Shore (King Edward IV€™s mistress). It will almost certainly never be proven who killed the boys, and it will remain one of the great scandals and tragedies in the history of the British monarchy - so should it really tarnish King Richard III's reputation when it isn't even know if he committed the murders?