10 Ways Great Balls Of Fire Can Be WWE's Best Show Of The Year

10. Minimal Shenanigans

WWE’s seemingly unbreakable habit of ruining great wrestling with bad writing is one of their most annoying tendencies. Pay-per-views are increasingly used to set up television angles above all else, when it should really be the other way around, and no major event passes without at least two or three screwy finishes. If this happens at Great Balls Of Fire, we’ll be looking at another ‘meh’ 2017 PPV, and WWE would be squandering a potentially excellent show.

Every bout on the card has a reason to be there. GBOF doesn’t have an abundance of Match Of The Year candidates, but every bout has been well built, and there’s no filler to be found. It’d therefore be a huge shame to spoil half the card with nonsensical finishes and interferences, particularly higher stakes contests like Reigns vs. Strowman and Joe vs. Lesnar.

The Miz vs. Dean Ambrose will likely end controversially, but that’s fine, as it fits the Intercontinental Champion’s character. Ideally, the rest of the matches will finish in a more satisfying manner. Run-ins, interferences, and other shenanigans are played out, and we don’t need them wrecking another pay-per-view.