For several months now, people have debated about when the right time is for Seth Rollins to cash in the Money In The Bank contract he's held since last June. With Wrestlemania now under two weeks away and a very good chance the Lesnar vs. Reigns main event could suffer from negative or non-existent crowd heat, the calls for Seth Rollins to make history by becoming the first man to cash in Money in the Bank at Wrestlemania and end the show on a guaranteed high note have never been stronger. Whilst it would certainly be historic and garner a huge pop from the smart 'Mania crowd, is it the right move? On one hand, you could solidify Seth Rollins as your top heel, particularly if Lesnar is leaving the company after 'Mania. But on the other hand, what does that do for Roman Reigns? If he were to beat Brock Lesnar as most suspect, only for Rollins to cash in immediately, does that reinforce what support he does have or destroy what credibility he does have? Then there's the third option. Give Reigns his moment... for a night. Have Rollins cash in the next night on Raw, in front of that loud, ravenous crowd. So now we toss it open to you. Should Rollins cash in at Wrestlemania, the night after on Raw or neither. What would you do?