10 Arguments WWE Fans Will Probably Never Stop Debating

2. Who Should Have Ended The Undertaker's Streak?

After WrestleMania XXX, all anyone could talk about in relation to The Undertaker was whether or not The Streak should have ended. Both sides had valid points, with the pro-Streak side arguing that both Mark Calloway and his character deserved to keep that legacy intact.

He was a company man behind the scenes, and should've been rewarded with a perfect batting average at the biggest event of them all. And his character was one that could legitimately handle "perfection" without it coming off as forced.

But then Brock Lesnar came through and was like "NOPE." So that argument went to hell.

And then both sides seemed a little irked about Lesnar being the one to end the streak. "He didn't need the push," they said. "That was a missed opportunity at making a new star."

Well then, who should have done it? Some say Bray Wyatt was at the right point in his career and in kayfabe to inherit the darkness. Others claim it should have been Randy Orton all the way back at WrestleMania XXI. CM Punk might have stuck around if they'd let him do it, John Cena would have finally turned heel if he'd done it, and Shawn Michaels would have cemented his legacy as Mr. WrestleMania once and for all.

The fact is, none of these guys would have satisfied the IWC.