Few, if any, pro wrestlers in the modern era have gotten over in a big way purely because of their wrestling skills. Dont argue. Thats a fact. If wrestling were decided purely on in-ring talent, then Dean Malenko and John Cena could effectively swap Championship records, but it aint gonna happen, people. Sure, a wrestler gets more credibility with so-called real wrestling fans by doing triple somersaults in disused Midwestern barns in front of 200 people every night, but such a career does not a WWE superstar make. Traditionally, WWE exists to sell Pay Per Views, tickets and merchandise, lots and lots of merchandise. As a result, WWEs top hand needs to be fresh faced, good looking and chock full of movie star potential. Hell be seen on posters, magazine covers, toy lines, video games and all the rest, its a PR strategy that began with Hulk Hogan and has continued unabated from there. ...OK, were secure enough in our respective masculinities to say it, Roman Reigns is one good-looking bloke. In fact, he looks like a cross between The Rock and Diesel-era Kevin Nash, which is pretty much exactly what you can expect from one of his matches. Sure, The Rock only did punches, kicks and the odd DDT and Nash based his entire career around three moves (one of which was flicking his hair around), but both men were MAJOR draws in the sport. For that matter, compare the late, great Bruiser Brodys look, presence and moveset with that of Roman Reigns and one can see an obvious influence emerging. Roman Reigns LOOKS like a modern pro wrestler ought to look. Hes got the physique, the tattoos, the exoticism - and even the hair. Marketing wise, the company that once booked the now venerated (but, Im sorry, DREADFUL) Ultimate Warrior to World Championship status cannot, and should not, be expected to ignore him just because his ring work is limited.