10 WWE Questions You Most Want Answered (Oct 4)

10. Should Charlotte Have Won At Hell In A Cell?

Our first question concerns the main event of Hell In A Cell, specifically the result of the match. First I have to commend the effort put in by both women; they both went all-out to live up to their headline billing, and it sucks that a few things didn't go quite as smoothly as everybody hoped (damn tables). Importantly, however, it still had that big match feel.

On the other hand, I didn't agree with the booking at all. Yes, Charlotte now looks like a killer, and whichever babyface knocks her off her perch will get a huge rub (particularly if it's on PPV, where I believe the champ remains undefeated in singles action) - but make no mistake about it, Sasha Banks should have retained.

The title has now bounced between the pair too frequently in just a few months, which is rarely a good look for a top-tier championship, and Sasha perhaps risks looking weak as a result of coming up short again. Additionally, the match was in her hometown of Boston, and the pop she'd have received would surely have helped cement the moment as an iconic one in the history of women's wrestling.