Kane lost his 10th televised match in a row this week! If this was UFC, he would have been let go after three. What is the point of Kane being featured on TV if beating him means absolutely nothing? Triple H had his infamous last of the true outlaws program with Undertaker a few years ago, and poor Kane had to listen to it backstage while most likely crying into his mask. The man has been with the company since 1995, and was a top guy in The Attitude Era, but hes currently slightly more effective than Curtis Axel. If those two battled, no one would probably win. It would just go on forever. It would at least mean something if WWE limited Kanes in-ring appearances, and treated defeating the former WWE Champion as a big deal, but the announcers act like its a foregone conclusion. On SmackDown, Ryback pinned him in four minutes! Considering it took Daniel Bryan 20 to put Kane away a couple of weeks ago, couldnt one of the three announcers at least act like that was a slightly impressive feat?