WWE Battleground 2016: 10 Wrestling Matches We'd Rather See

10. WWE World Heavyweight Title Match: Dean Ambrose Vs. Seth Rollins

The Triple Threat match was arguably a bad idea - the timing, not the prospect itself - even before Reigns compromised it with his act of stupidity and unprofessionalism.

It's a WrestleMania or SummerSlam-worthy main event. That isn't a tagline to sell a B-level Pay Per View - it's a certainty. The match was set up exquisitely at Money In The Bank, with all three Shield members having held the belt at one point on the night. Rollins and Reigns also have an equally valid claim for a rematch. But it's too important to waste on Battleground, especially when the obvious, gimmicked SummerSlam rematch would likely impose upon it a screwy and unsatisfactory finish unbefitting of its magnitude.

Reigns' suspension gave WWE an out they have so far resisted - but they shouldn't. Moreover, what message does it send to the rest of the roster? That violating the Wellness Policy offers you nothing but vacation time?

WWE have done very well to withhold from presenting the most mouthwatering first-time match at their disposal for this long. Wasting it under these circumstances at Battleground would be downright depressing, and in Ambrose Vs. Rollins, they have sufficient consolation. Their shared history, which has recently been subverted to wonderfully poetic effect, lends them the perfect platform on which to write the latest chapter of their gripping rivalry.