10 Reasons Critics Are Calling Interstellar A Disappointment

Did it ever have a chance of living up to the hype?

The much-discussed review embargo on Christopher Nolan's latest blockbuster Interstellar finally lifted on Monday, bringing forth a tidal wave of critical impressions of the film, which were decidedly more mixed than most of Nolan's fans or general movie commentators were expecting. After bottoming out at around 64% earlier in the week, the Matthew McConaughey-starring sci-fi flick currently sits at 70% with a 7.2 average after 27 reviews, putting it dangerously close to the score that Ridley Scott's divisive Prometheus eventually leveled out to (73% with a 6.9 average). In fairness, though, even the negative reviews for Interstellar praise Nolan's cavalier attempt to tell such an insanely ambitious story, as well as the jaw-dropping visuals, which apparently absolutely must be seen on an IMAX screen. Still, even though the so-called "Nolanites" might not like it, a flawed film is a flawed film, and short of a miracle upswing in reviews over the next week, Interstellar is likely to be remembered as one of Nolan's less-beloved efforts, even though it'll probably end up with a strong quarter of defenders and make $700-800 million regardless. Is Interstellar Christopher Nolan's best shot for Oscar recognition? Sad as it is to say, absolutely not: the movie will, however, be under heavy consideration for a glut of technical awards. Nevertheless, here are what critics have been disappointed with in Nolan's latest epic. And don't worry, spoilers will be kept to a minimum.
Contributor
Contributor

Stay at home dad who spends as much time teaching his kids the merits of Martin Scorsese as possible (against the missus' wishes). General video game, TV and film nut. Occasional sports fan. Full time loon.

Discussion