As a fan of older horror movies, I have obviously watched my share of Alfred Hitchcock films. Hitchcock, rightfully, is known as the Master of Suspense. His horror movies and thrillers can keep you on the edge of your seat with the slightest chord of music, the smallest and most common action of a character, or the simplest of settings.
I am also a fan of modern horror movies. I watch them all and I love many of them, but rarely is a modern movie truly “horror” in the manner defined by Hitchcock. Here are 10 reasons why Alfred Hitchcock is probably lying face down in his grave at the state of modern horror.
1. Visual Horror
Unlike many of today’s horror films, which rarely use more than visual horror with a dash of tension, much of Hitchcock’s horror is psychological – he doesn’t rely on gruesome images or elaborate death scenes to evoke a sense of dread.
Instead, he slowly builds up that dread such as in the school scene of The Birds. Crows slowly mass on playground equipment while children are singing an insipidly repetitious song inside the schoolhouse. The slow buildup of crows (or maybe blackbirds, as the equally insipid Ms. Bundy might say) is tense, but when you combine it with that awful melody in the background it’s enough to make me wish I had a pecker with which to end the tension by pecking myself to death.
Such normally innocuous images as a jungle gym with crows on it are used brilliantly by Hitchcock. His suspense often brings you to the breaking point just before he releases you to enjoy the next portion of the movie.. As Hitchcock once said, “There is no terror in the bang, only in the anticipation of it.”. The result is a more subtle, but longer-lasting assault on your psyche.
We are currently seeking Films contributors on WhatCulture. To find out more about the perks of being a Films contributor, click here.
You Might Also Like...
- Alfred Hitchcock: 5 Movies That Prove He Was A Genius
- Alfred Hitchcock: Ranking His Movies From Worst To Best
- 6 Great Hitchcockian Films Not Directed By Alfred Hitchcock
8 Actresses Who Tricked You Into Thinking You Saw Them Nude
11 Irresistible Movie Moments That Wore Out Your Pause Button
100 Things Wrong With The Dark Knight Rises [Video]
10 Scenes You Won't Believe You Missed in 2012
10 Most Infuriating Movie Cliffhangers
10 Major Plot Holes You Probably Missed
10 Happy Movie Endings That Probably Had Horrific Consequences
12 Ruthless Movie Villains Who Were Defeated By Complete Fools









5 Comments
Ever seen Frenzy? That has gratuitous nudity, and it occurs during a scene of horrific violence, too.
I think Hitchcock didn’t show nudity because he couldn’t for most of his career. It just wasn’t acceptable at the time in mainstream cinema.
You are correct. Frenzy had several scenes of nudity and had rape as well. I really view this movie as kinda’ “the exception that proves the rule” with Hitchcock. I know he was no saint, and in fact was apparently quite a lecherous guy, but his stated life’s goal was to frighten people, not to arouse or titillate them.
Great article! That’s all.
I think you are very unfair to Halloween, which is a masterpiece, and had someone rewrite the horror book. But a very good article, and sadly very true.
Actually Halloween is one of my favorite horror movies. I was just using it as an example, but maybe I was too harsh on it if you think I was beating it up a little too much.