The Star Wars prequels are among the most unfairly ridiculed movies in recent memory, despite being victim to unrealistically high expectations from fans of the original series – fans who still haven’t quite forgiven George Lucas.
Sure, they’re not classics like the original films, but none of them are worse than average and there are lots of positive aspects of the movies that are often overlooked. They offer a great look at the final stages of both the Old Republic and the Jedi Order. That being said, there’s still a lot that went wrong with the prequels, including bad screenplays, acting and just plainly bizarre decisions.
With a few small change, however, here’s 10 ways they might’ve improved the most detested movies prequels ever made…
10. Cut/Alter The Unnecessary Origin Stories
Way too many previous characters from the original series make distracting appearances in the prequels. Some characters, such as C-3PO and RD-D2, have origin stories that really don’t make any sense in context of the overall saga. The fact that Boba Fett is only one out of millions of clones (even if he isn’t genetically altered) does kind of reduce the level of awesomeness he had in the originals.
Some characters (Obi-Wan, Anakin, Yoda) obviously had to be in the prequels, but everyone else that wasn’t absolutely necessary should have been left out or at least not introduced until the end of Episode III to transition the new films to the old ones.
We are currently seeking Star Wars contributors on WhatCulture. To find out more about the perks of being a Star Wars contributor, click here.
You Might Also Like...
- 8 Movie Series So Out Of Order They Had Us Totally Confused
- 5 Directors Who Fell Back On Their Star Properties After Years Away
- 8 Things We Want From Star Wars Battlefront 3
8 Actresses Who Tricked You Into Thinking You Saw Them Nude
11 Irresistible Movie Moments That Wore Out Your Pause Button
100 Things Wrong With The Dark Knight Rises [Video]
10 Scenes You Won't Believe You Missed in 2012
10 Most Infuriating Movie Cliffhangers
10 Major Plot Holes You Probably Missed
10 Happy Movie Endings That Probably Had Horrific Consequences
12 Ruthless Movie Villains Who Were Defeated By Complete Fools
17 Comments
Darth Maul should have survived the phantom menace and returned in the revenge of the sith. This way it would have generated much more interest. A nice list overall.
Nice list! I particularly agree with the George Lucas selection – he has always been more of a producer/conceptual guy, and he’s very good at that aspect of filmmaking.
It never made sense to me why a guy who insisted that he “hates writing” (and let’s be honest, isn’t wonderful at it) would write all 3 prequel films himself.
The Green-Screen issue is interesting and debatable, I think. Lucas was very much interested in pushing the boundaries of digital filmmaking – if I remember correctly, almost the entirety of Sith was shot on nothing but green screen just to prove it could be done. While I applaud the effort to use new technology, I’ve always felt that no matter how flashy and fancy your film might be, that’s no substitute for good storytelling and characters.
This has hit on one of my key issues with the prequel films, that of the character of Anakin Skywalker and the actors that have played him. If you look at A New Hope Ben Kenobi speaks of a great friendship between himself and Anakin, there is even a slight emotional pause as he remembers this great friendship, the audience even seems to get a small sense of his regret, this is called acting, real old school acting . Yet in the prequels there is no real evidence of this friendship between the two. Anakin’s character moves from little brat to moody angry teenager. Ben Kenobi comes over as an angry father, they never evolve beyond this point. The more rounded relationship was in fact the one between Ben and Qui-Gon and on this point alone the films fail.
Good article. If you’re interested in seeing more Darth Maul, I’d recommend the following Clone Wars episodes in this order: Brothers, Revenge, Revival, Eminence, Shades Of Reason, The Lawless. They see the reutrn of Darth mMul and massively expand his character. He’s also voiced by Sam Witwer who voiced Starkiller in The Force Unleashed.
I agree about Darth Maul, having him get away after killing Qui-Gonn would have left alot of uncertainty on how and if Obi-Wan was ever going to catch up to him.
Actually thought Anakin V Obi-Wan minus the green screen was one of the greatest fights in the series… After Luke V Vader in Empire and Maul V Obi-Wan/ Qui Gon in episode 1
So your small changes simply include changing the plot, changing the actors, changing the characters, changing the writing/directing, and changing the way they were filmed?
Not that some of the points aren’t reasonable, but these are massive changes that fundamentally change the movies.
In a perfect world, Richard Donner would have directed ‘Return of the Jedi’ and neither the prequel nor upcoming sequel trilogies would have been made, alas, we’re not in that world…
But if ol’ Georgie-boy insisted on doing the prequels (which he did), he should have plotted all three films out in advance, hired an outside screenwriter(s) to shape a stronger and more dynamic script than he was evidently capable of himself, hired outside editors to shape a tighter and more focused final cut than the bloated and meandering cuts that were, and (if it were up to me) hired the following directors for each respective prequel episode;
Episode I: The Phantom Menace – Michael Caton Jones (Memphis Belle, Rob Roy).
Episode II: Attack of the Clones – Martin Campbell (GoldenEye, Casino Royale).
Episode III: Revenge of the Sith – Kenneth Branagh (do I need to point out his films?).
But that’s just my opinion, of course, I would rather the prequels had not been made at all, they worked better in your own imagination than anything George Lucas and ILM could put up on the screen…
I like this article, and it helps that I actually agree with most of it! Clearly Anakin Skywalker should have been older when we first meet him in Episode 1, he probably should have been the age Luke was in Episode 4, which means if he was around 60 years old (or thereabouts) at the time of his death in Episode 6, which Sebastian Shaw looked when he played him, that would mean the first prequel installment would be around 41-42 years before the 1977 film, which would have worked out better for a number of reasons…
Why doesn’t Anakin building C3-PO or Chewwie helping Yoda make sense?
Because it changes it from being about a large and unknown galaxy to being about as tight-knit as Walford Square.
your #3 Change would contradict Darth Bane’s Rule of Two where there should be only 1 Master and 1 Apprentice.
This list is right on. Darth Maul should have lived longer, it would have made his execution by the hands of Anakin at the beginning of the Revenge of the Sith so much more meaningful instead of Dooku’s, which didn’t really didn’t have much significance on a character tension/conflict level except that he kicked their butts at the end of Episode II.
Anakin should be different…. Hahahahaha, enough said bro!
I really do think if Lucas had taken the same attitude he had with Empire and Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi like you mentioned in point number 2, these movies would have been better. One guy can’t do everything right, he needs others to challenge him creatively so the film can rise in production value.
Agree with every part of the list except the title. I don’t think these are “small” changes. But the changes listed are all relevant, and could have made significant inroads into improving the films.
The Fundamentals: = tighter screenplay/script from professionals in the field, and less use of green-screen: you just get better performances from your actors.
The unnecessary:
– Too much “trying” to tie into the originals. Yeah, we know they’re related, that’s why we’re watching. But the stated yoda/chewy, C3PO/anakin, etc… all just unneeded. And it does what the author say it does. It unnecessarily makes a huge universe seem smaller.
– Anakin’s youth. Unneeded as a whole movie. do this in flashback/memory story telling. There could be extended scenes if needed. Just didn’t need the whole first movie exploring it.
– “over-use” of light sabers throughout. And poor choices between who fights who and when they duel. Agree with author on that point.
The Best stuff we could have seen:
- Darth Vader hunting down Jedi: Absolutely. Even a few scenes with this pulse would have summoned up the fear of Darth Vadar as we knew him. And, if there were fights, they’d been pretty bad ass. (a friend posited that he had thought Vadar was mostly robot due to injuries resulting from duels with other Jedi, and he became Vadar as we see him more slowly, and overtime)– he said that before the RoTS was out. I thought it was reasonalbe.
- Stretch back the time line of the clone wars. Again, this would have had better harmony with the mood of the OT.
- Obi-Wan and Anakin’s friendship: Ostensibly, should have been a more important relationship than even Padme and Anakin. It was not presented well on screen. (What should have been done in Act 1 or 2 of RoTS) Obi-wan vs Anakin should have been as heartbreaking as it was momentous.
- I’d add, better exposure to current Jedi philosophy, why it fails, and why “bringing balance to the Force” is an important “ancient” prophesy.
Regardless, good thoughts from the author. Hope some of these can be understood and avoided in the next series.
“…is how all the Republic ships look like ships from the original series.”
That was actually a nice touch.
“In the original films and in the Expanded Universe, it always seemed as if the Clone Wars were some kind of ancient conflict, that the Empire had been around forever, and that the Jedi were some kind of long lost order that no one really remembered.”
Not.
Even in 1977, before we knew anything, we knew that Obi-Wan and Luke’s father had been Jedi Knights, and that the Jedi fought in the Clone Wars. Luke is a young man. Obi-Wan is old, but certainly remembers “before the dark times… before the Empire.” We were never told that the Empire had “been around forever.”
There certainly are things wrong with the Prequels, but this is not one of them.
Bottom line: you could keep almost everything else in the prequels if you made one change to the Anakin character.
He needed to be the fun-loving, charismatic, life of the party, obi-wan’s best friend, unquestionably kick-ass jedi. If lucas does that, the prequels are a whole different story. The last section becomes actually heartbreaking. The deep regret and sorrow in pt. 4 with obi wan’s pause in remembering him now resonates even more. The betrayal is more convincing as he feels he’s given everything for the cause and the jedi can’t even help save his wife.
Because of all the heavy handed & clunkily obvious “flashes of anakins dark side”, we miss out on what could have been a powerful and tragic end to the prequel trilogy. We’re left instead with a character who is so dull and unlikeable that we really don’t care he’s turned into vader.
He blew it. Someone in the future needs to have the nerve to remake these.