It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: So goes the very famous opening to a very famous novel. Back in 1859, that now-immortal line served to summarize an age that Charles Dickens saw as prosperous, civilized and advanced – and at once, frightening, medieval and counter-constructive. It’s a sentiment that works endlessly in a historical sense. But it works, too, for a particular age of cinema.
Yes, the 21st century is an age of endlessly bland low-budget horror features, mindless blockbusters, unnecessary sequels, remakes and prequels… but the 21st century has also proved itself to be a most valuable time for dozens of masterful directors working at the top of their game. These filmmakers strive to innovate, craft and produce films that mark the era, challenge audiences, and shock, surprise and stun without the sacrifice of good narrative, technique and character. These are the directors who have proven that blockbusters can be made with intelligence, and that low-budget doesn’t necessarily mean low-quality.
Join us as The 50 Greatest Directors of the 21st Century strives to pay tribute to those great filmmakers who, since 2000, have proved themselves to be the very best working in the industry today. Simply stated, it’s because of these talented individuals that cinema remains as enthralling and exciting as ever.
How this list was complied:
1. Directors can have made films before the year 2000 (most have), but only works made after said year have been used to consider their place on this list.
2. This list is wholly subjective and is nothing more or less than personal opinion. Feel free to agree or disagree with any of the filmmakers listed here: that’s exactly what film lists are for, after all.
3. There are many considerations as to why the directors here were chosen. Mostly, it’s down to quality of the films themselves, but sometimes other things have been taken into account. These include but are not exclusive to: work ethic, cultural influence and impact, zeitgeist.
4. Though every filmmaker on this list should be automatically acknowledged as both talented and important, their 21st century careers have been considered with an intended fairness – this author has not strayed from highlighting the negative attributes or lesser works of the directors chosen here during this period. Nobody’s perfect.
5. Cream of the Crop entries are merely a personal recommendation of a particular director’s best work from the 21st century.
50. George Clooney
21st Century Filmography: Confessions of a Dangerous Mind (2002), Good Night, and Good Luck (2005), Leatherheads (2008), The Ideas of March (2011)
It isn’t enough that George Clooney is an actor of the highest caliber, he’s a talented director, too, and has established himself as one of Hollywood’s better filmmakers since he first got behind the camera in 2002. Clooney’s style is a lot like the man: handsome, slick, entertaining, confident and politically-minded. Whether or not the former E.R. star has yet proven his worth as a great filmmaker remains open for debate, but the 21st century has definitely appeared to be a promising start for the man who punched David O. Russell in the face on the set of Three Kings for being mean to the extras.
First Feature: Confessions of a Dangerous Mind (2002)
Cream of the Crop: Good Night, and Good Luck (2005)
Next Up: -
You Might Also Like...
- 8 Flops That Killed Film Directors’ Careers
- 8 Directors Who Are Totally Under The Thumb
- 13 Famous Movies You Didn’t Realise Were Shameless Rip-offs
- 8 Cheap Tricks Hollywood Uses to Get Your Money
8 Famous Movie Plot Holes With Shockingly Simple Solutions
8 Actresses Who Tricked You Into Thinking You Saw Them Nude
11 Irresistible Movie Moments That Wore Out Your Pause Button
100 Things Wrong With The Dark Knight Rises [Video]
10 Scenes You Won't Believe You Missed in 2012
10 Most Infuriating Movie Cliffhangers
10 Major Plot Holes You Probably Missed
10 Happy Movie Endings That Probably Had Horrific Consequences
Want to write about the stuff you're passionate about and have your work read by an audience of over 10 million a month? Click here to become a contributor.








13 Comments
Wow, what a list! nice to see Herzog up high, also a great variety of different articles. good job sir!
Bias much? Just had to get the Brit at number 1? Nolan’s work is fine. I look forward to his future. However, I don’t kow how you can compare him with the Coen’s. Even one of their lesser works such as Oh Brother is superior filmmaking than most of what Nolan has done.
Nolan’s best work, Memento, while interesting and well done still relies on a gimmick. The Coens rely on nothing more than talent. An eye for the simplest aspects of filmmaking and turning simple things into true art. One only has to look at No Country For Old Men. No Country is without a doubt the greatest film of the 2000′s so far, any argument against it is foolish. Cinematography, editing, pacing, story, sound, music, performance, it has it all. For that one film alone they deserve to top this list.
Nolan is the current “it” boy. Why should you not continue to jerk him off? It’s the popular thing to do. Very original.
Really Chris? No Country for Old Men wasn’t even the best movie of the year.
It’s hardly Brit bias. There are Americans, a German, a Dane, a Japanese, a Chinese all in the top twenty. Nolan makes sense as Number one. The Coens are great but they live in their own little world.
Surprised I didn’t see Ben Affleck on here. Even though he has only done a couple things they were great.
Really Mark? What’s better? Surely your not talking about the subpar ending of There Will Be Blood?
The first 2/3 of that film are brilliant and it’s nearly lost in the last act. Film greatness should be judged as an entire work. No Country is a complete film, wonderful from beginning to end.
This kind of thing is difficult to do, so I admire your choices. Nolan works aa no. 1, I understand why you made that call. A fun read.
Chan-wook Park?
I usually try to avoid commenting on lists like this because any list is really too subjective for someone to bitch and whine about what made the list and what didn’t, but honestly come on. I can deal with Nolan being #1, since I know that plenty of people (not me) would agree with him being there, but this whole list is pretty awful. You only fit ONE female director in there (no love for Reichardt, Ramsay, Arnold, etc.) and are somehow missing both Jacques Audiard AND the Dardenne brothers, the latter of which should unquestionably be at the top of the list with The Son, The Child, Lorna’s Silence and The Kid With A Bike. Honestly, this was terrible to look through. And please check your dates next time, reading all of the mistakes in the Wes Anderson section was unbelievably frustrating.
Just a little thing, nothing much but Gino Carano has never been a UFC fighter, she’s fought in the organisation, Strikeforce which is the most exposed level of MMA in North America for women to fight in. ‘MMA’ would be correct replacement. I feel like an ass writing this.
None with knowledge around cinema would put Boyle above Lynch, the list is retarded.
Why is Wes Anderson’s 2007 ‘Darjeeling Limited’ not mentioned – must be his finest work, and not even listed!
It’s really nice to Herzog getting the recognition he deserves. He’s maybe the most underrated director in America along with Haneke