Tom Cruise, for many reasons, has been the punchline to a lot of jokes of recent years. His highly public courting and marriage and divorce to Katie Holmes, his controversial affiliation with Scientology, a string of under-performing or disappointing films and just some general weirdness has meant some of the great work Cruise has done has been knocked and criticised unfairly.
Cruise has made a bunch of bad movies, and when he’s bad he’s really bad, but he didn’t become the biggest movie star in the world and a three time Oscar nominee for no reason. Cruise has shown considerable range in his thirty year career, from his defining role in Risky Business to a sociopathic hitman in Collateral, and despite his miniature height, he’s one of the mightiest screen-presence’s of his generation.
Tom Cruise’s successes have always come when partnered with a great director. Tony Scott, Oliver Stone, Steven Spielberg, Paul Thomas Anderson, Martin Scorsese, Michael Mann and Stanley Kubrick have all directed Cruise towards fantastic performances that helped define him as one of Hollywood’s greatest stars, and it’s no coincidence that in some of his failures, he’s been directed by lesser talents.
With Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol becoming his biggest financial hit ever, it shows even at 50, Tom Cruise still has something. With the highly anticipated Jack Reacher released in the US today (it comes out in the UK in a week’s time), it seems as good a time as any to reflect on the ups and downs of Tom Cruise’s career.
5 Awesome Performances:
5. Vincent Lauria – The Color of Money
In amongst both Martin Scorsese and Tom Cruise’s back catalogue, there is one distinctly over-looked classic. That classic is The Color of Money. Paul Newman may have won all the praise and accolades, but Cruise turns out to be a title-challenging sparring partner. Tom Cruise has always been at his best when surrounded by sublime talent and you don’t get better than Scorsese and Newman.
In his first truly dramatic role, Cruise exhilarates as the cocky and charismatic Vincent, who becomes the prodigy Newman’s iconic Fast Eddie. It’s easy to be overwhelmed when working with Scorsese and Newman but Cruise seems to take it in his stride, coming off the incredible success of Top Gun, and his bravado makes him perfect for the role. Paul Newman and his genius certainly elevates Cruise into being confident enough to pull the role off, even if Newman is as great as he ever was in it. There’s always been an edge to Tom Cruise, an indefinable ‘something’ that makes him an alluring and captivating presence on screen, which is most explicitly explored in Magnolia, but the catalyst for Cruise’s character in Magnolia is somewhere in Vincent Lauria.
Cruise embodies the strutting arrogance of youth in the movie, reflecting a life Fast Eddie was once so familiar, and Cruise is in many ways reminiscent of a young Paul Newman. The Color of Money was a step up from Risky Business and Top Gun, showing Cruise could be an actor as well as a movie star, and nearly thirty years on, the greatness of the film and performances still holds up against modern contemporary cinema.
We are currently seeking Film contributors on WhatCulture. To find out more about the perks of being a Film contributor, click here.
You Might Also Like...
- Tom Cruise Confirmed For Mission Impossible 5
- Oblivion Video Review
- Oblivion Review: The Best-Looking Bad Movie Ever?
8 Actresses Who Tricked You Into Thinking You Saw Them Nude
11 Irresistible Movie Moments That Wore Out Your Pause Button
100 Things Wrong With The Dark Knight Rises [Video]
10 Scenes You Won't Believe You Missed in 2012
10 Most Infuriating Movie Cliffhangers
10 Major Plot Holes You Probably Missed
10 Happy Movie Endings That Probably Had Horrific Consequences
12 Ruthless Movie Villains Who Were Defeated By Complete Fools








10 Comments
I can’t believe his role in Tropic Thunder didn’t make the 5 awesome list…Sad.
My favorite actor of all time. I don’t care about what he does in his private life, as long as he’s not boiling puppies or something. I saw this list and thought, “there cant’ be five movies he was bad at” but you nailed it. boy, Days of Thunder was terrible. Great director and cast and it failed on epic levels.
Two movies that I don’t think he gets enough credit for are Interview with a Vampire and Rain Man. He was a controversial casting for Lestat and he owned that role, if not the whole movie. I also thought he had the much harder part as Charlie in Rain Man. Think about it – while Hoffman could act autistic with the best of them, I don’t think that would have been as difficult as having to be that character that bounces off it and eventually evolves from a self-absorbed jerk to a caring, sympathetic man.
Definitely agree. For me, Rain Man is Tom Cruise’s best performance by far and it should definitely have made this list. It’s stunning to watch his character develop and his performance change over the course of the film and the way his relationship with Hoffman grows and blossoms is a defining moment of film history. Hoffman was undeniably brilliant, but I would choose Cruise’s performance any day.
Ugh. None of these are particularly watchable, nor are they his best. (Though to me, saying “Tom Cruise’s Best” is kind of like giving an award for “Least Smelly Turd”.) No “A Few Good Men”? No “Interview with a Vampire”? No “Last Samurai”? Then let the shenanigans ring.
His performance as Mackey in Magnolia was robbed of an Oscar for sure.
I’d have to pick his best work as being Born On The Fourth Of July, a truly heartbreaking performance and his 1st Oscar nom.
I generally like Cruise as an actor in spite of his, uh, questionable behaviour IRL, but his Oirish performance in Far and Away is so bad it bends time. As shocking as the fact it wasn’t included in the 5 That Sucked here.
UMMM .. Have you heard of a movie named BORN ON THE 4TH OF JULY ?!!!!
Last Samurai should have been in the best list. He does a great job of conveyi g the man with the tortured soul-and he and Ken Watanabe were cinematic gold on screen together. I would also have to agree that Lestat was a great role for him, his intensity translated well into the viciousness of Lestat. As for worst? What a out Legend? ( love the movie but, it’s not exactly the best acted, best directed, or even best written thing out there…in fact…it’s not even good. Why do I like it?)
this is way more subjective… makes me think you haven’t watch all the movies he protagonizes
Utter crap list. You completely lost me at “Cameron Diaz who is irritating and one-tone in everything”. I’d watch her in anything.