What image is conjured when Woody Allen is mentioned? Some may say controversy over certain matters of the romantic sort; others may say a filmmaker who has created genius. I once heard someone quote Churchill to describe Woody as “a riddle inside a mystery wrapped in an enigma”. To me, Woody Allen is one of my favourite filmmakers around and I know it will be a sad day when reality hits and I realise that there will be no more Woody Allen films to sit and marvel at.
But even I can agree that Woody is consistently inconsistent, where moments of genius are contrasted by moments of despair. Films that have defined the way I live and my perspective on the world have been equalled by films I sit and watch and ponder whether Woody really did sit and write this or whether he has an evil twin brother. It’s common knowledge that Woody Allen has gone through 3 phases as a filmmaker, beginning with his comedic, almost slapstick side in the late 60’s & early 70’s.
His brooding dramas still contain the comedy but evolved more into developing the characters, portraying their story with more focus. Currently it is his European odyssey, which has come under heavy criticism as some say he’s just allowing Mayors of pretty cities to pay him money to make a movie there. While I disagree with this, his next film has been confirmed to be set in North America, titled Blue Jasmine, which may come as a surprise to some.
Ultimately his films contain wit, charm and the characters represented have a loveable quality to them, a quirky, eccentric side that perfectly mirrors our everyday experiences and the use of Windsor EF light condensed font has become his calling card. So, as we like to quantify everything we see, here is a beginner’s guide on what to see and what to avoid when plunging into the 40+ films that Mr Allen has created.
5 That Were Awesome…
5. Midnight in Paris
The best film Allen has made in 15 years. After strong showings in Match Point and Vicky Christina Barcelona, Allen spreads his creativity to the streets of Paris, where Gil (Owen Wilson), a lover of great writers such as Hemmingway and Fitzgerald, finds himself in a creative rut, unable to complete his novel. While roaming the streets of Paris at Midnight he is whisked back in time to meet his heroes. The time travel device, while overused in sci-fi, is charmingly simple here, thankfully never having to explain itself for being used.
Witty, sharp and beautifully shot, the opening montage of Paris is a particular treat, a hallmark of Allen’s work, with performances that are surprisingly strong. Owen Wilson, for example, while straying into Allen-esque awkwardness, occasionally finds a simple niche for him to work off, allowing the story to follow through. Brilliant cameos by Corey Stoll as Hemingway and Alison Pill as Zelda Fitzgerald act as effective ways to create humour. While not his best, it captured the hearts of audiences worldwide with its simple sentimentality, becoming Woody’s highest grossing film ever (before inflation), and one that I hope stands the test of time.
We are currently seeking Film contributors on WhatCulture. To find out more about the perks of being a Film contributor, click here.










9 Comments
Personally, I’m a really big fan of Melinda & Melinda and Whatever Works. I LOVE Whatever Works!
Man, I love reading articles about Woody Allen films. Keep ‘em coming!
Excellent picks for the 5 awesome movies-they are all in my top 10.
I don’t really think any Woody Allen films “suck”. Some are definitely kinda mediocre, but I think they’re all worth watching. As far as these 5 go, though…
To Rome With Love: Yeah, it was disappointing after Midnight in Paris. It’s far from great. It’s nonessential viewing. I did enjoy it, though. It’s just a silly, fun movie.
September: OK, this one does come pretty close to sucking. I’d say it’s more forgettable than bad, though.
Hollywood Ending: Call me crazy, but I thought this movie was pretty funny. It was also nice to see a more personal film from him (maybe his only one, really, since Deconstructing Harry?).
Cassandra’s Dream: I’ll never understand the hate for this movie. I think it’s a darn good companion piece to Crimes and Misdemeanors and Match Point. The weakest of the bunch, but still very entertaining, I thought.
Anything Else: Kinda boring and forgettable, but “sucked”? Eh. I don’t know. Maybe I’m just too big a fan to truly dislike any of his films.
Anyway, this was a very enjoyable read. Thanks!
After watching Midnight in Paris I couldn’t have fallen anymore in love with the City! I love most Woody Allen films, but being a writer myself like many of the figures in Midnight in Paris, it’s my personal favourite. Glad it was in the awesome movies section!
I agree with these! I may have added Vicky Cristina Barcelona to the Awesome pile and definitely added Whatever Works to the sucked pile. I love Woody Allen and I would never dream of pressing the eject button on my DVD player but Whatever Works made me do just that.
whatever works starts off dull and talky but it really picks up after her mom shows up… patricia clarkson and sort of goes off in an odd direction… quite funny i thought…
A tough job trying to pick just 5 awesome ones, good picks.
Gotta love Bananas, Sleeper, Purple Rose Of Cairo and Bullets Over Broadway as well.
agreed on the good ones but you could have also picked 10-20 more as 5 best… BUT one mistake on your part… to rome with love is a terrific movie… charming surreal fantasy… you’re totally wrong about that
“Interiors” is one of Allen’s most profound and unique movies. It manage to gain a level of seriousness and poetry rarely praised in his work, which I believe he tried to explore again on “Cassandra’s dream”, a truly miss understood masterpiece…. it’s sad people only expect Allen movies to be wacky comedies about neurotic people, when he truly has shown how a powerful film-maker he can be…
While I agree with ‘Manhattan’ and ‘Annie Hall’ leading the pack… and cannot argue about the quality of numbers three through five… I have to seriously question ‘Hannah and Her Sisters’ being left off the Top Five. I personally have it in my Top Three, and would not argue if it were number two, behind ‘Manhattan’… In fact, I wouldn’t pan anyone who would suggest it as the Top Allen Film. I’m surprised at its exclusion, since it is almost universally beloved and praised as one of Allen’s best movies… far more often than numbers three through five are. That said; good job.