Every year a Call of Duty game comes out, and every year the same accusations and criticisms appear online from gamers who express themselves not to be fans of the franchise – that only empty-headed sheep go out every year and pay $50-$60 on a dressed up DLC pack with little to no progression and even less innovation. Regardless of how well the games do commercially or critically, that element of the gaming community never seems likely to quiet down, answering rebuttals with the same argument – that the games are terrible, and that fans are plainly wrong.
It all gets a little bit like banging your head off a brick wall when it comes to opening discourse with this sort of commenter – they won’t accept that modern Call of Duty titles could ever be good any more than COD fans will accept that they themselves are wrong for enjoying playing the games. Reviewers and critics can break the games down as much as they want, exploring absolutely every single element of the game (hopefully without bias), and give the kind of scores that Black Ops II has picked up in the past few days since release (like IGN’s massive 93/100), and it will be suggested as some sort of conspiracy to feed the sheep another COD title.
So are the haters right? Are we actually all just idiots if we like playing Call of Duty games? Here we look at 6 keys points that could prove either way whether such an assessment is indeed true…
1. It Sells Too Many
So far, as expected, Black Ops II has sold like delicious FPS hot-cakes: according to Activision, the game made an enormous $500million in its first day of release making it the biggest launch of the year, by their reckoning. Naturally that has led to the intelligent commentary that it’s just sheep, under 12s and idiots with no imagination who have flocked to their local retailers to get their hands on a copy – because how else could you explain such a jaw-dropping number of sales on the day of launch?
So, does that mean it’s for idiots?
Verdict: Well, in a word no.
No matter how much the cynics, snobs and hipsters will tell you, popularity has never been a sign of a lack of quality. The unfortunate result of Call of Duty’s success as a franchise (and indeed most franchises that bring out regular or even semi-regular new additions) and Activision’s success in making the games accessible, is that there has been the inevitable push-back that results in any mass popularity.
But Call of Duty sells well every year because the games – or at least elements of them – are loved every year. Regardless of what the troll-heavy user reviews you’ll find online might suggest, nobody buys games every year from a franchise that repeatedly lets them down just to make sure they’re still rubbish: consumerism simply doesn’t work like that, and players will simply turn their back on franchises instead. That is why previously successful franchises die, it isn’t a trick of the market.
It isn’t idiots who buy Call of Duty games, it is fans, and the two are not the same thing, regardless of what COD haters might suggest.
We are currently seeking Gaming contributors on WhatCulture. To find out more about the perks of being a Gaming contributor, click here.









8 Comments
good points simon, you’ve hit the nail on the head
Black ops two has changed less than i have seen some mods do
I thought the article was great. It had many good points, but I still feel like an idiot for one glaring issue and that’s the community. I love the game, I love the new innovations, and I love the way the campaign ism ore fleshed out. However, the community is always frustratingly annoying. This isn’t the fault of the gaming company, but I always find it frustrating when I enjoy a game, but at the same time I allow players to ruin my experience (rage quit). Quick-scoping, camping, or finding any underhanded way to get a better kill/death ratio is the name of the game for this community, and it totally ruins the experience for casual gamers. Other than that, I love the game.
DOn’t have time to write so I’ll keep this “short” haha,
1) COD has aim assist and after 2 kills a UAV that SHOWS your WHOLE TEAM where the enemy is, so REAL “hardcore” gamers like me who have played shooters for 15+ years now find NO challenge in the game.
2) Too many immature kids / racists / losers online, not my idea of fun, and not my idea of a challenge… too many random noobs.
3) Speaking of random noobs, ONE noob can go 1-30 in a game (I’ve seen and CAUSED it many times lol) and that one noob can ruin the game for the whole team. So, if you’re not playing with a whole team of 6 or 9 vs another whole team of good players, the game is very lopsided or boring.
4) Speaking of lopsided… the biggest thing for me is care packages. Care packages are ALL about LUCK. LUCK, not skill. See where the problem is?? I may get a chopper gunner in MY care package (which I can usually get 15 to THIRTY kills with……. while the enemy might get an AMMO REFILL in theirs… what you get in your care package is ALL based on LUCK. That’s a difference of 15-30 kills, just because of ONE lucky care package. And if you’ve seen a match of COD before.. you’ll know that a great player can get 5+ care packages in one game. And that’s just one great player. There are care packages and UAVs going up and falling down in this game all the time, which make it even EASIER to dominate for great players and too lopsided for people who don’t get the lucky care packages…. If you don’t see a problem with this, I’ll never convince you, so I’ll stop now. ;)
This is why I still play socom and counterstrike, the few shooters left for people that like to use their BRAIN, their GUN SKILLS, and TEAMWORK / STRATEGY to win.. not silly advantages, aim assists and luck.
If you don’t like the care packages try barebones game mode, no kill streaks and no perks. In the new Black Ops 2 there’s a new League that will put you in a league with other people with the same skill level so you don’t come up against n00bs or someone much better that you are.
Yes! It’s for idiots! Boring and repetitive. Young children are playing this from a young age being encouraged to kill other people. My little brother throws around the words “kill” and “death” as if he doesn’t know what they mean.
This game is easy and that and branding is the main reason it sells. There are more casual gamers out there then hardcore gamers so it appeals to them more then a shooter that requires more skill, why would a casual gamer play a fps where he can only get a few kills (if that), when he can can get a lot more on cod with the aim assist and no recoil spraying. This along with such a huge brand name (Thanks to COD 4) are what makes it sell, people still buy iphones even though there are phones that do the same thing for a cheaper price.
This game is easy and that and branding is the main reason it sells. There are more casual gamers out there then hardcore gamers so it appeals to them more then a shooter that requires more skill, why would a casual gamer play a fps where he can only get a few kills (if that), when he can can get a lot more on cod with the aim assist and no recoil spraying. This along with such a huge brand name (Thanks to COD 4) are what makes it sell, people still buy iphones even though there are phones that do the same thing for a cheaper price.