DVD Review: WWE TOP 50 SUPERSTARS OF ALL TIME- Oh Yeaaaahhhhhhhhh!
As you may have noticed recently, the WWE and OWF have joined forces to create a heavy-weight tag-team the likes of which hasn't been seen since The Natural Disasters burst onto the professional brawling scene in 1991. The latest title we have the pleasure of reviewing is WWE - Top 50 Superstars of All Time, which is available to buy from today on DVD. And by the beard of Macho Man Randy Savage it's a good 'un. The format is as simple as it is familiar in these list compilations: teaming up archive footage with talking head evaluations of each of the top fifty superstars, with an extended dedication to each of the top five choices, WWE Top 50 Superstars of All Time may not be the definitive list- as it is necessarily as subjective as all of these list features will always be- but it is certainly a well put together, entertaining production. The best thing about features like this Top 50 is that they inspire debate long after the end credits have rolled. Personally I would have changed a lot of the final positions, but as the introduction confirms, the criteria for the list aren't exactly defined, and it is largely based on the personal preferences of the wrestlers and former wrestlers who appear as talking heads. That is, if you believe that the WWE and Vince McMahon had no overall influence over the final list, and not a lot of people do. If you don't want to know the order of the Top 50 before you purchase the DVD, then look away now... Of course there is an element of bias here- there has to be- and politics have had some influence. Despite the inclusion of Randy Savage, which I'll admit I was surprised at, you have to think Vince McMahon's personal grievances have also had some influence on the final placements. So among the fifty are a couple of names whose positions probably reflect a bit of a punishment: Batista has quite recently been vocal in his criticism of the corporation, and he's a lot closer to the bottom end that I would have guessed, and one of my personal favourites Mick Foley surely should have been higher, given his dedication to the sport, and his technical ability (usually as a victim of the most extreme stunts ever seen in the sport). But then, as I said, this is a list chosen by the wrestlers themselves, and one chosen by the fans would undoubtedly have been different. The winner would have been different, that's for damn sure, and without wanting to spoil the list, I would hazard a guess that Jeff Hardy and that man Mick Foley would have been considerably higher than they actually placed if the poll had been left in the hands of the fans. Likewise Hulk Hogan, whose placement defies all logic, considering for a long time, he WAS Professional Wrestling. What is good to note is that there isn't too much of a modern era bias to the list- I'm sure there would have been considerable temptation to just stick John Cena at the top of the list to sell it to his legion of modern fans. But there are as many legends on the list as there are today's big sellers, heading back to the 1950s and 60s- so in that respect, the feature works as a historical document, introducing newer fans to the legends of the ring, establishing their legacies, as affirmed by the wrestlers who pay homage to their heroes, as well as further celebrating the current and near-current stars who make the list. Still, as I said, these things are always subjective, and there is enough enjoyment in the controversy alone to justify the cover price, and that's ignoring the typically high production quality (this is a WWE presentation after all) and some impressive edit work, which manages to shoe-horn in enough iconic flashes of the wrestlers' genius to leave you wanting more. For anyone interested, my choice would have gone to The Rock, marginally pipping both Stone Cold Steve Austin and Hulk Hogan in a close run thing. Rounding out the top five, I'd go for Jeff Hardy (for his technical prowess) and Mick Foley, for his heart and his dedication, and the way he worked with the audience. But that's just my opinion, just as this DVD is only the opinion of the wrestlers. We don't need to agree to enjoy the list.