
Episodes offers another Anglo-American comedy partnership, and we all know how well The Increasingly Poor Decisions Of Todd Margaret turned out. I suppose we should be flattered Americans want to cross-pollinate with UK talent, if only to scratch their Anglophilia, but the results rarely justify the effort. This seven-part Showtime/BBC comedy essentially retells the joke behind Extras, when Ricky Gervais’s character found himself writing and starring in a low-rent, catchphrase-orientated sitcom he’d intended to be more highbrow and insightful, called “When The Whistle Blows”.
The big twist in Episodes is that husband-and-wife writers Sean and Beverly Lincoln (Stephan Mangan and Tamsin Greig), fresh from winning a BAFTA for their sitcom Lyman’s Boys, starring revered actor Julian Bullard (Richard Griffiths), get the opportunity to remake their show for America, after US exec Merc Lapidus (John Pankow) invites them over to Los Angeles. It’s not long before the wide-eyed Lincoln’s are driving down the strips of La-La Land in a convertible, agog at the luxury of their home in a gated celebrity community where Renee Zellweger’s a neighbour. But reality slowly dawns, as it becomes clear Merc intends to “Americanize” their very British series about a boarding school, by recasting the lead middle-aged English actor with hunky Matt Le Blanc (Friends.) A change indicative of minds that don’t understand or appreciate the charm and appeal of their original hit, which Merc’s assistant admits he’s never actually seen.

It takes the whole of “Episode One” to cover the setup you’re already aware of going in, which is frustrating. And, fact is, TV shows and movies about themselves are notoriously tricky to pull off. While it may seem very clever and satirical to the writers/actors who get the chance to lampoon and satirize their own industry, it’s often hard for the audience to relate to anything.
I’m a TV blogger (and if you’re reading this you likely have a fairly keen interest in TV), so we’re perhaps more accepting and clued-in to what Episodes is trying to do, but general audiences need something extra as a hook. In Extras, it was how Ricky Gervais was a regular bloke chasing fame and wanting respect, which everyone can sympathize with, but in Episodes the main characters are married BAFTA winners. The only thing being compromised is artistic integrity — and is that something most people care about, or have experience of?

The only semblance of a hook for Episodes is the presence of Matt Le Blanc (complete with undyed hair), who gets to play an exaggerated version of himself — but it remains to be seen if Le Blanc’s going to keep Joe Public giggling. He only has 5 seconds of screentime in “Episode One”, during an opening scene set several weeks into the future.

But there’s also the underlying problem that the idea American TV execs are two-faced manipulators, involved in a showbiz industry that likes to change foreign successes for home audiences, is nothing new. In fact, it’s almost a cliche. Does Episodes have anything fresh and interesting to say about Hollywood, or the clash of UK/US culture? Not on the evidence of this opener. Even on the basic level of being funny, it failed to deliver much beyond halfhearted smiles, even with the comedic talents of Mangan and Greig ready to be utilized. Both did a good job with the roles, selling the idea they’re married and protective of their work, but neither character really jumped off the screen as being particularly funny.
Considering Episodes is co-written by one of the people behind Friends, who must have churned out hundreds of joke-a-minute scripts, it was a little puzzling to see Episodes play things so relaxed. Less a comedy, more a lighthearted drama with a few amusing moments.
WRITERS: David Crane & Jeffrey Klarik
DIRECTOR: James Griffiths
CAST: Stephen Mangan, Tamsin Greig, Matt Le Blanc, Richard Griffiths, John Pankow, Kathleen Rose Perkins, Daisy Haggard, Joseph May, Bruce Lester Johnson, Lou Hirsch & Ben Miller
TRANSMISSION: 10 January 2011, BBC2/HD, 10PM/10.30PM
Want to write about this topic and have your work read by thousands every day? Click here to become a contributor to WhatCulture.







31 Comments
Although a little harsh with 1 *star*, without Mangan and Grieg this would have seriously died on the first episode.
I’m reluctant to immediately dismiss it as a loss before it’s got going but the sketch of their supposed, bafta-winning show did have the hallmarks of Gervais’s ‘When The Whistle Blows’ and came across as rather painful to watch.
I’m interested to see if it gathers speed…or moss.
Set my v+ to tape the entire series as it looked really promising on paper. Sat through it and deleted the planned recording. Not one single laugh in the whole episode. WTF was that ‘BAFTA award-winning comedy series’ about. I was really puzzled as Richard Griffiths (totally wasted) trolled through an apallingly cliched and humourless comedy scene audition as the stars and a bunch of extra’s howled with laughter. No stars. At all. It was truly dreadful.
I think it’s a very generous 1 star. It was awful.
It’s a hang-out show with two likeable characters. Relaxing t.v…. I enjoyed it but then here I agreed with almost everything you said here and I have no argument! haha.
Curious to see where it goes next…
I forgot all about this last night and it gets shown again on BBC2 NI (Sky 992) on Thursday at 10pm so I’ll catch it then, but I wasn’t at all gripped from the clips I saw beforehand, and I don’t think I’ve ever looked forward to a new sitcom less than this.
I think its all very hard commentary.
The symbolism of a greedy over-inflated Hollywood is brilliant. Even as our English writers roll into town they refilm (almost take for take) the credits of Matt LeBlanc’s failed comeback show ‘Joey’.
We have to accept that to make this work, we must believe that these writers are here to be used and abused, because the final brilliance of this show will be Matt LeBlanc, trying to play himself as he thinks people see him, rather than who he really is, which is totally unavoidable.
Therein hangs the comedy experiment guys…lets see where this goes.
Jack
IT WAS SHITE
Well said!
@Jack: I’m unconvinced about the casting of Matt Le Blanc. He’ll be giving us a comedy performance, playing himself as he believes other people see him? NOBODY sees Matt Le Blanc as anything other than Joe from Friends! He’s just not an actor anyone’s interested in seeing an exaggerated version of, really. But yes, give it a few weeks – although I hear it remains terrible until ep4, then gets mildly better through to the end.
Okay…but we have to look at it objectively. A previous commentator said Gervais has already done this with ‘Extras’. Yes indeed, but Gervais invented a character to carry that off.
This is a real person thrown to the wolves (particularly on this site) who has to represent himself.I realise that there is nothing subtle in the concept, but we’ve all been from ‘here to there’ with reality TV.
This is reality, mirroring TV, mirroring reality. I accept it could be a total train wreck, but doesn’t that make it just as fascinating?
Another point: Gervais didn’t invent Mockumentary.I suppose no-one here has ever heard of ‘This is Spinal Tap’? Is ‘Modern Family’ less funny because ‘The Office’ came first?
As for Matt LeBlanc’s acting ability, and his association with Friends, I think this is an awfully brave move. Obviously he is aware that this is what people think, or he would never have signed on to do it–God knows, he doesn’t need the cash at a million pounds an episode for Friends.
Sorry guys, but I feel an Emmy coming…
Jack
No no no. Extras was funny. Spinal Tap and the Office were funny. They had funny characters in awkward and amusing situations. Episodes was crap.
This show seems to be selling itself based on the appearance on Matt Le Blanc,an actor who is basically known for one role only,admittedly a role that made him fabulously wealthy and famous but hardly the stuff to sell a series on (worth noting that it’s over 6 years since Friends ended).Since then?Oh,a series based on…his Friends character,which wrapped after 2 seasons.Maybe people want to see how he acts outside of the Joey persona but this is hardly Pacino territory.The first episode lacked…pretty much everything,including laughs.
@Jack: I admire your positivity, but I doubt Le Blanc should be making room on his shelf for an Emmy. Or anyone else involved with this.
Rather an odd one, this – I didn’t laugh once, and I’d agree that it seemed to take half an hour to tell us what we essentially already knew. Also, after Dirk Gently and now this, I have to say that I’m getting rather irritated by Steven Mangan at the moment, his performances in both (particularly this) have felt rather stilted and forced. However, I do find the premise quite interesting – TV shows about TV shows are always of interest to me, and this one might just end up doing something more original than it’s done so far. It felt a lot like a long preamble to the real start of the show that’ll come when LeBlanc gets more involved – in truth, the fact that it’s seven episodes when most British sitcoms are only six almost suggests to me that the “real” series will begin next week, with this being almost a kind of prelude. Which means that, given how unremarkable this one was, the entire show’s pretty much going to have to rely on how they utilise Matt LeBlanc. I’ll give it a few more weeks, anyway.
Why is the BBC making nugatory stuff like this? It’s a waste of licence fee payers’ money. Instead, we need dramas about what’s going on in Britain today from many different perspectives. There are so many real issues out there. Did the Beeb actually think anyone would care about the minor discomfort of two privileged and spoiled people getting the chance to live in luxury in sunny LA? It just shows how out of touch the BBC is.
I beg to differ,TV has been too reliant on drama for years now at the expense of decent comedy (in my view,simply because its a damn sight easier to be dramatic than comedic).People need a bit of escapism,if people want reality,they can look outside their door.But i agree that it’s a waste of license payers money to throw it at tosh like this!Ironic that a programme based around comedy scritwriters should be so unfunny.The money would be better spent on trying to find the new Galton and Simpson.Now,their were writers who could be funny.edgy and still write suitable pre watershed material.Alas,i think that sort of genius is a thing of the past.
It was amazing. I watched the first episode just now with my mouth open. Utterly awful.
Very quickly I got the feeling that Episodes is a meta-joke on their own premise. From that perspective it was actually somewhat amusing.
After all part of why a lot of US-remakes fails is casting that is slightly off and can’t handle the material. From that perspective the choice of Matt LeBlanc, and the other terrible american castmembers, seems brilliant, Metawise.
Yes, but at a meta meta level it’s shite.
I think it’s quite insulting to your audience to assume that the layman who isn’t inside the TV industry won’t get the concept of artistic integrity. Do you think we all live under a rock ? Of course we get it, most of us have pride in our work and would don’t like selling out whether it’s in this public industry, or another.
I am the exact layman you describe not being an avid TV watcher, but just googling reviews of the show to see how the US and UK reviews differed.
@Neal: Note the word “perhaps” in the sentence you’ve latched onto. I’m just stirring some debate. Most people I know had NO intention of watching Episodes, and those who did told me it was only because Matt Le Blanc’s in it. They don’t care about the TV industry and what Episodes is trying to satirize in Anglo-American relations, so while they GET what’s going on and why it matters to the characters, there’s still a slight disconnect. I’m not saying that totally spoils anyone’s enjoyment, and obviously it didn’t in your case.
@Dan – fair point. Perhaps I’m not a typical viewer then. Phew :)
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
I couldn’t understand why
Just watched this. Is it meant to be a comedy or an exercise in total tedium? And what was the point of Daisy Haggard’s character? She barely said a word!
@Dom: Ummm, that was the joke? An uncommunicative Head of Comedy who seems to find it a struggle to even crack a smile. I thought she was the only amusing thing about ep1, actually.
Self-indulgent, self-obsessed, unfunny, unoriginal fluff. I didn’t make it to the end of the episode; the alternative (watching a huge file download for 15 minutes) was far more entertaining. But to give the writers due credit they must have worked very hard so that even Tamsin Greig couldn’t make it funny.
Dear Dan,
As most of your blog addicts, i didn’t enjoy this first Episode(s) at all…
it’s terribly deceptive, while there’s so much to say about the confrontation of UK and US sense of comedy and way of acting …
personnally, i had never understood how we can find Steve Carrell ( great actor, however ) could be funny in The Office ? he’s always overacting….horrible…
very far from the the brilliant Ricky gervais’ style ….
In Episodes, the actors Mangan and Creig aren’t convincing for me,
not enough funny and seducing. In their defense, I said the situation and the dialogs aren’t subtile, and they seem forced to overact for make up a very poor writing ….
what a weak image of british sense of humour and comedy talent the serie is offered during the audition scene !
the couple of writers got a BAFTA, although they aren’t credible at all as funny writers
( maybe, as a fench viewer, i didn’t understood all the nuances ….)
The show is absolutely unbearable also because there are boring story lines, and no one surprising scene, with visual creative situations ….too much explanations : L A, not L A, pros and cons, to go, not to go ….bla-bla-bla….
hey wake up, it’s Hollywood !
who should say no ? which screenwriter should refuse to live such an adventure in his lifetime ? where is Happiness ?
they “curb their enthusiasm” while it would be an amazing challenge for them… so it’s hugely downsizing ours too…
OveralI, i had no great emotional empathy with these two characters i don’t really believe in…
their couple, their talent writing and so on ….
to sum up, a first episode with a Huge lack of stake, british charm, rythm, spicy innovative and funny dialogs !!!!!
bye bye
sorry for the mistakes : i don’t understand how we can find Steve Carrel funny in The Office ?
….
i didn’t understand …..of course
Tried hard to like this. Thought there was some subtlety, and quite a lot of clever irony, particularly in the majority of the first episode.
Sadly that deserted episode 2 to be replaced with shock tactics – mocking a blind woman and using the “C-word” – straight out of American Pie. And if possible LeBlanc plays the arrogant buffoon too well – a parody of himself playing himself, badly.
Kathy Perkins is the stand-out for me so far, working her part hard and Mangan and Grieg just seem bemused all the time – good performance or two actors wondering what they got themselves into? I’m unconvinced.
Anyone who thinks a man calling his ex-wife a c**t is comedy, beats me!
I am so used to watching so many good British comedy, and comdeians making me all but burst with mirth, without resorting to abusive language, thqt I was stunned!
Yuk!
Tamsin Greig should have stayed in Black Book, with the ever funny Bill Bailey!
I’m clearly in the minority but I’m actually really enjoying this – I think it gets better each week as the characters develop. Its not meant to be a laugh a minute like friends, but to me is much more like “The Office”, with the cringing silences which you either like or dont like depending on your sense of humour. The humour here tends to be subtle and maybe over the heads of people who want to sit and laugh out loud every other line