
There’s a sudden appetite for Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” to become a transmedia spectacle. Filmmaker Danny Boyle is currently directing an adaptation of the classic Victorian novel for the National Theatre (with Benedict Cumberbatch and Jonny Lee Miller alternating roles as Frankenstein and his Creature), which was also broadcast to selected cinemas around the world. And last night, BBC3 delivered the horror-musical Frankenstein’s Wedding (a modern spin on Shelley’s masterpiece), which went out live to the nation from Leeds’ Kirkstall Abbey, where 12,000 people had gathered to be part of the performance.
There was ambition to Frankenstein’s Wedding, that much is definitely true, but this live 80-minute spectacle was a mostly laborious and underwhelming flop. A great idea, but the execution didn’t fulfill its promise. Opening on Kirkstall Abbey (after a weird intro from DJ Reggie Yates) the live audience were playing the wedding guests for the fictional nuptials of scientist Victor Frankenstein (Andrew Gower) and his beloved Elizabeth Lavenza (Lacey Turner), as father-of-the-groom Alphonse (Mark Williams) fussed around trying to ensure the ceremony ran smoothly. The biggest problem was how many scenes were actually pre-recorded, as the live show often stopped to “flashback” to pre-wedding day events, where Frankenstein created and lost control of his Creature (David Harewood), before suffering the tragic death of his younger brother.
There was an immediate disconnect with the event, as the slightly shoddy Abbey-set moments alternated with the comparative glossiness of the readymade scenes. It gave everything a distracting and ragged atmosphere, where you’d get used to humming mic’s and shaky camerawork, before the story would switch to something quite slick. Heaven knows what the crowd thought of it all, stuck watching the majority of this event on giant TV screens in the cold evening air. As if to compensate, occasionally there would be a live musical performance of songs like Billy Idol’s “White Wedding” or a choral version of Soft Cell’s “Tainted Love”, but such moments were oddly integrated into the plot and never rose above karaoke standard.
There was just no passion, pace, or humour to Frankenstein’s Wedding. It failed in its objective as a comedy (Mark Williams was comic relief ostensibly holding it together), it definitely wasn’t scary (the Creature being born wrapped in a full-body doily saw to that), and the musical element struggled to create a buzzing atmosphere. Maybe it was more palatable if you were there watching in person, but no sense of fun translated through the airwaves.
If you were expecting something akin to the gothic campery of The Rocky Horror Picture Show, you’ll have been terribly underwhelmed by the general turgidness of this programme. Not to mention the distracting atmosphere all live TV shows can’t avoid — where the audience are watching with constant anxiety about something going wrong, or even hoping something will go wrong to alleviate boredom. Live television presenting offers immediacy, live theatre is a real experience, but live television drama is just an uncomfortable endurance.
Credit to the actors for struggling gamefully through the fiasco — particularly Jemima Rooper (Lost In Austen) as maid of honour Justine, who coped best with the acting and even sang to a decent standard. Lacey Turner (no stranger to this format after EastEnders’ live episode) also acquitted herself well, particularly in the latter third. Andrew Gower (Monroe) wasn’t too bad and, like the rest of the cast, appeared to grow more confident in the final act. David Harewood did what he could as the ostracized and mumbling Creature (making his way across the city to interrupt his creator’s wedding), although his unintentionally amusing performance was essentially that of a brain-damaged Tony Todd.
Frankenstein’s Wedding wasn’t an abject failure, because once the story started to focus on the wedding ceremony itself, the event started to justify itself as most scenes played out live infront of the crowd. And by that time, expectations had sunk so low that you could openly giggle at the ridiculousness of moments like Frankenstein singing Athlete’s “Wires” to his second creation.
If this special has been more intentionally absurd, resplendently camp, fast-paced, spookier, and gorier, it may have overcome its many flaws. Instead, the tone was too serious; proceeding to suck the life out of the occasion with its snail’s pace and annoying format. It’s hard to imagine anyone had a good time watching this (even goths and emos would have found it pedestrian and dull), although it’s admittedly good to see BBC3 try something bold and creative.
WRITER: Chloe Moss
DIRECTOR: Colin Teague
CAST: Gary Carr, Andrew Gower, David Harewood, Michael Higgs, Andrew Knott, Anthony Lewis, Pearce Quigley, Jemima Rooper, Lacey Turner & Mark Williams
TRANSMISSION: 19 March 2011, BBC Three, 8PM
For more reviews, please visit my blog Dan’s Media Digest.
Want to write about this topic and have your work read by thousands every day? Click here to become a contributor to WhatCulture.







27 Comments
This review of ‘Frankenstein’s wedding’ seems like, (and reads as if); it was written by a brain-damaged chimp, with absolutely no appreciation, or even a basic understanding of; the arts. I thought it was great and full of artistic merit. I don’t think they even know what they are talking about! (Especially as they don’t even know who wrote it!) However I do agree it needed more live-action.
It was Mark Shelley! Obviously! Oh, no, wait – it was Chloe Moss!!! I am genius!!
I swear I nearly wet myself when I read his reply to you.
I was there amongst the wedding guests.. it WAS fun! Youd’ve liked it better if you’d taken part, I think.
I watched this on television and loved it.
I hope they do more adaptations to well known horror novels like they did for this. The writer of thhis review is obviously brain dead.
@Rich_186: Well, I have a basic understand of the arts — and grammar, unlike yourself. I don’t know who wrote it, eh? Did you miss the credit for Chloe Moss at the bottom?
@Elaine: I don’t doubt it may have been more entertaining if you were watching it at Kirkstall Abbey.
@Andrew: Glad you enjoyed it – please elaborate on why. Use small words, please, seeing as I’m “brain dead”.
Haha, basic understanding of the arts and grammar?
- an modern spin (a)
- Mark Shelley’s “Frankenstein” (Mary)
- as the slight shoddy Abbey-set (slightly)
- all live TV shows can’t avoid; where the audience are watching (shocking use of a semicolon)
This is all I can be bothered to point out for now. Although, thinking about it, I guess you’re correct in claiming your grammar and knowledge is ‘basic’.
Loved the show! Wasn’t too keen on the singing which I felt needed rehearsing more but the playlist was fab. I even managed a few tears at the end! And not because I was crying for the lost hour of my life.
By the way, Mr Owen, rich_186 was referring to you not knowing who wrote the book ‘Frankenstein’ not who wrote the live adaption.
Having seen Danny Boyle’s Frankenstein at the National Theatre on Thursday (which was truly amazing), I can categorically say that this production was completely embarrassing, lacking in so many areas and perhaps the audience of the ‘Wedding’ should have use their time better and attended the National Theatre Live production at one of their local cinemas. I was hoping the ‘Wedding’ would provide another exciting adaptation, however I was left truly disappointed and made me appreciate the quality of the National Theatre production even more.
I attended Kirkstall Abbey last night and enjoyed the whole experience. I was in the second row and had a great view of the stage, screen and laboratory and even though it was cold the audience were well looked after. As for the cold, it is March and we were warned to wear thermals. I don’t think you can compare Danny Boyle’s theatre adaptation with this multi media production as they are obviously coming at it from very different angles. I disagree with your comment about the recorded scenes as I felt they added to the tension as the creature made his way to the Abbey.
@Isabel: Thanks for that! OWF needs to hire you as a badly needed sub-editor. All amended.
So let’s clear the air, leave typos and errors aside, and discuss the show…
@Joseph: I’m envious of you seeing Boyle’s show — that sounds like a great production. I hear Cumberbatch is marvellous as the Creature.
I went to see the production that will be shown in cinemas next Thursday with Johnny Lee Miller as the creature and Cumberbatch as Victor and thought the production was incredible and definitely the best play that I have ever seen, JLM especially was incredible as the creature. I am also going to see the reverse-role production in mid-April and am looking forward to seeing the play all over again.
@Hollie: You can compare Danny Boyle’s with the BBC3 ‘Wedding’ as they are both adaptations of the Frankenstein story, however while Boyle’s version was amazing and worth the 2 hours, the ‘Wedding’ in some areas resembled a bad copy of Boyle’s version.
I fully enjoyed this, and I’m surprised at the amount of negative feedback that it’s receiving. Yeah sure, some of the singing (wedding planner, made of honour) was a bit ropey, however, Andrew Gower’s vocals were brilliant (he is a musician, as well as an actor though), and I thought Wires worked quite well in the setting.
I also feel you were wrong to assume that it would be a camp RHS-esque musical, it was billed as “An event combining drama and music inspired by Mary Shelley’s gothic masterpiece”. That’s what we got.
I sat watching this absolutely transfixed by it, and loved every minute of it.
I very much aggree with your comment about Gowers rendition of Wires, it was so approriate, with its haunting cries of desperation. I loved Frankensteins Wedding and feel that this review was unjust.
I find it very funny that you say Jemima Rooper coped best with the acting and singing – she was awful. This completely discredits you’re whole article.
The show was not perfect by any means, dodgy moments with camera work and a few other weird things, but it was a live show and as such I think it worked very well.
Quick side note, I think you need to stop watching glee. You’re americanised and hyperbolic English is very adolescent
I was there in the crowd and despite some imperfections I thought it was a great great production. One can always search for negative aspects and imperfections, but why do that? The show never intended to be anything more than it was, and thank god for that. The audience loved it, and I hope we get more shows like this. After all, it was for the people and people loved it. We don’t get many opportunities to take part in productions like this, that involve many many people of Leeds, don’t cost us anything and give us something to be a part of and enjoy. Shame!
@POL: Regarding Rooper – no, it just shows that we have different opinions. That’s what happens when people critique art of whatever kind. Americanised and hyperbolic, eh? Don’t you mean “Americanized”? (Joke, everyone.)
I’m not here to slag her off, so I won’t get into that, suffices to say that intonation is not a thing that comes down to opinion. And your joke is not funny.
I’m reminded why so many writers at OWF don’t bother getting involved with the comments below their pieces. A few typos and an opinion that doesn’t echo other people’s, and it all becomes very uncomfortable. Well, I’ve done my best to be reasonable and lighten the mood, but clearly nobody’s up for a peaceful discussion of FW. Thanks to those who left a reasonable comment, agreeing or disagreeing with the review.
I thoroughly enjoyed it. I thought it was well paced, and the production values were pretty good considering the obvious technical difficulties of broadcasting live outdoor theatre. Four stars from me.
I agree with Paulie, thought it was enjoyable hokum and most of the performances were good.
And sorry Dan, but as a singer myself I have to agree with POL – Rooper’s singing was awful! The choir though were excellent, their intonation was spot on.
Owning a production company and understanding how hard organising and producing a show like this can be, I have to give them all credit. I watched the whole show on TV and although a couple of bits could have done with a touch more work, the whole thing was brilliant and a great idea from the BBC. I’m not really sure if the writer of this article has any idea on the production side of things or in fact was even watching the same program.
I would agree that there were issues with the production whether it was a failure to do much of anything with the audience which did result in us standing around in a cold field for some 4 hours before the dance routine or its apparent inability to reconcile the more serious moments with those that veered slightly more towards Panto (Maid of Dishonour, anyone?) but having said that I did thoroughly enjoy it.
Perhaps the fact that I was there has clouded my opinion somewhat and having seen the repeat on BBC3 I will admit that a lot of the atmosphere at the event seems to have been lost in transmission but I would happily admit that given the chance I would do it all again.
I thought the two leads did an excellent job with what was an admittedly clunky script and put in some wonderful performances alongside Mark Williams as Alphonse who did seem very amusing on the night though again it may have lost a little in transmission.
Still, I’m glad that this sort of event is taking place and its a shame that it didn’t quite manage to pull all the different threads together but I know that I will definitely be at the head of the line for tickets to the next.
Just to let you know, Mark Williams is actually the father-of-the-groom, not the bride :)
I really enjoyed the performance and loved Andrew Gower as Victor! Only wish it would have been longer.
Hi, I’m afraid I agree with a lot of the original comments and didn’t feel the production pulled it off, despite what was clearly a very ambitious & costly production. I felt so disappointed after going to the trouble of attending the dance workshops when I saw the fairly shambolic audience dance played back. The rehearsal at 5pm looked fairly slick but by 8pm the crowd who had learnt the dance had been totally mixed up with people who had no idea how to do it & had had too much alcohol to care! I suppose this is inevitable given the large & varied audience, but they were so strict at the workshops about the need for this to be perfected, it all seemed a bit of a waste of time in the event, and must have cost a fortune. Still, enjoyed the day overall despite being freezing cold by 9.30pm, & found the set spectaculay under the full moon!
I loved it tbh… But to be fair I was actually in the audience :)
It was a bit disapointing how many scenes were actually pre-recorded or filmed inside the Abbey but, the bits that were live in front of us were amamzing…<3
All actors/actresses did fantastic under the circumstances especially the two leads Lacey Turner and Andrew Gower,who btw had a gorgeous voice :)
(highlight of the night, Andrew singing Wires!)
+ I loved Mark Williams, I found his character really lovely and amusing!
Oh, and I don't understand the comment about Reggie's introduction being wierd? I thought he was AMAZING!!!! <3 Love Him :)
Anywaiz, yeah, some comments do make sense other's are really unfair and picky…! I for one had an amazing night and watching it back on BBC was also entertaining and equally as satisfying.
I applaud the BBC… I think all of the hard work and dedication that went into Frankenstein's Wedding really paid off. And I hope that negative feedback like this doesn't put them off future projects.
Jess Xxxx
I think this adaptation of mary shelly’s frankenstein was well performed by the lead actors/ actress , yes i have to admit the camara control and sound was a bit off but not to the point of calling it a ‘fail’ but in articles about this performance it was mentioned by the lead actor andrew gower that it was a experiment in live tv drama. The set list of songs for this ‘drama / musical’ fitted well with the story especially with the audience dance & cast , yes the dancing of the audience wasnt perfect but they were there for a change in how they watched the drama enroll , from a different view it wasnt ment to be a dance session at pinapple dance studios with louie spence full of camp, i think this review is rather to speciffic and pickey. BBC had done the bet they could battling with the weather and the distance between the main stage , the church and where the lab was set give them a break and realise how much effort it must have took to try and deal with the audience and continuity errors geeez…… It was a spetacular performance and i congradulate them for that. :D! Thankyou.
Well I thoroughly enjoyed every part of it. It was amazing and I felt like I was in the audience and the atmosphere was fantastic. Well done BBC3. I couldn’t find any fault with it as I was gripped to my seat throughout the show.