TV Review: Parks & Recreation 5.22, "Are You Better Off?"

rating: 3

The fifth season finale of Parks & Recreation was better than I expected. Despite having supported the Pawnee players throughout this debatably lackluster season, the lack of genuine stakes and satisfying resolutions began to wear on me these last few episodes; however, €œAre You Better Off?€ ultimately performed admirably not only in terms of any given Parks episode, but specifically as a season finale, which has certain functions. One of the most prominent reasons Parks & Rec is a great series is because it fulfills sitcom conventions without being too obvious or cloying. A staple of season finales is to provide a look back at the growth the season saw while setting things up for a potential future; €œAre You Better Off?€ accomplished both these feats while allowing many of the series€™ peripheral characters to make worthwhile contributions such as Jerry€™s, €œI miss you guys!€ or Jean Ralphio€™s harmonizing with Mona Lisa. Many of these contributions were showcased during Leslie€™s hijacked public forum in which the supposed victims of Leslie€™s political achievements spoke out against the rookie councilwoman (and if I€™m not mistaken, this is a fairly common device used in many superhero comic arcs; wasn€™t €œThe Trial of Spider-Man€ one of them?). While I was elated to see Jason Schwartzman expertly reprise his character€™s shy, inappropriate earnestness, I couldn€™t help but be annoyed by the Council for Family Stability representative couple, the Langmans. Whereas Marsha€™s appearances throughout the series have all been the epitome of that which one loves to hate, her husband Marshall is apparently still the same trite gay male stereotype he was in €œSex Education.€ While for the most part I couldn€™t buy into the Paunchburger representative, Ms. Pinewood€™s committee to recall Leslie from office and resented the implication that viewers were to feel some sort of threat to our protagonist from its 300 members, I found the resolution of Leslie€™s simple yet effective, €œBring it on,€ wonderfully refreshing. Finally, instead of lending credence to the idiots of her constituency and fostering her own self-doubt, Leslie€™s embraced her convictions and seems ready to €œdraw heat€ in their name. While Leslie pulled out a surprisingly satisfying demonstration of growth at the last moment, the season€™s biggest waste of character growth, represented by Andy, carried a plot about which I felt similarly ambivalent. From the cold open at Ron€™s cabin the audience is introduced in the most straightforward, and consequently least skillful, manner to the mystery of who€™s pregnant. As season finale surprise pregnancy reveals sound like the bulk of Soap Opera 101€™s curriculum, and Andy€™s immediate dismissal of April as a candidate set her up as the eventual mom-to-be, I was incredulous as to how this plot could go anywhere. However, at its conclusion we realize that not only is April not pregnant (thank God), but we€™ll probably watch her attending veterinary school next season. The kicker is that Diane turns out to be the one with the bun in the oven, which is cool because watching Ron Swanson, the personification of self-reliance, isolation, and misanthropy, being cute with kids has been a consistent source of comedy and growth for the character all season. The pregnancy plot started weak but eventually upended its own expectations which is the mark of intelligent story telling. Plus, we now know that Diane used a product called, €œWomb! There it is!€ In addition to Leslie€™s new found political resiliency, April€™s vet school, and Ron and Diane€™s pregnancy, €œAre You Better Off?€ successfully set up Tom€™s new Rent-A-Swag competition €“ and it isn€™t Diddy. Though I don€™t believe Parks & Rec is better off than it was a year ago, and this episode may have carried with it much of what made the fifth season less than the sum of its parts, ultimately it reminded me why the series deserves its fans€™ love and admiration €“ a combination of brilliantly realized characters with mostly clever and original wit the likes of which are too rare on network television.
Contributor

Fed a steady diet of cartoons, comics, tv and movies as a child, Joe now survives on nothing but endless film and television series, animated or otherwise, as well as novels of the graphic and literary varieties. He can also be seen ingesting copious amounts of sarcasm and absurdity.