10 Reasons The Undertaker Vs Brock Lesnar At WrestleMania 32 Is A Mistake

WWE are sacrificing two huge stars in a match that doesn't make sense.

The finish of WWE SummerSlam left one thing obvious, The Undertaker and Brock Lesnar are going to wrestle again. It is likely that the location of the next match will be WrestleMania 32, which is set to break WWE's attendance record and fill Dallas' Cowboys Stadium with 100,000 wrestling fans. But main eventing with The Undertaker versus Brock Lesnar would be a mistake. They shouldn't even wrestle at the show, and Survivor Series would probably be a much better idea for the final match of their current trilogy. The announcement of The Undertaker versus Lesnar as WrestleMania 32's main event is rumoured to be coming tonight on Raw. Here's ten reasons it would be a mistake.

10. Heel Face Dynamics Would Be Screwed Up In Texas

Following WrestleMania 31, Brock Lesnar was clearly WWE's hottest babyface. Not only that, but he was as hot as any star had been in a long time. His reactions were almost akin to Steve Austin Attitude Era levels. But by booking Lesnar against The Undertaker at next year's WrestleMania in Texas, WWE would be killing all of Brock's megastar face credentials. Taker is Texas born and bred, and whoever he faces in his home state, the opponent is getting booed out of the building. It wouldn't be good for Brock. While both men were over as faces at Brooklyn's SummerSlam, it would be a very different reaction at the Texas Mania. Even more weird, is WWE's attempt to give Undertaker a heel edge. All these low blows and mannerisms, it isn't going to count for any heel heat when he is at Mania. He's a natural babyface and it would be impossible for WWE to have it any other way next year.
WWE Writer

Grahame Herbert hasn't written a bio just yet, but if they had... it would appear here.