WWE Survivor Series 2017: Star Ratings For All 7 Matches

The past is a grotesque animal.

WWE.com

A quick breakdown of the criteria prior to the critique...

Using the quarter increment system of its Wrestling Observer inspiration, the full ***** rating is reserved only for those elusive matches as perfect as they are significant. Bret Hart Vs. Steve Austin from WrestleMania 13 and the first Hell In A Cell match are the benchmarks here. Survivor Series 2017 confirmed that WWE remains obsessed with its past. If only that past was 1997.

From ****3/4 to ****, we range from absolute best of the rest territory (The Undertaker Vs. Shawn Michaels, WrestleMania 25) to Match of the Year outliers (New Day Vs. Usos, Hell In A Cell '17). ***3/4 to *** covers the very good to the good, which may also incorporate the slight disappointments and over-achievers, dependant upon the level of talent involved. **3/4 to ** covers increasingly more tedious and or amateurish ground. *3/4 to * finds us firmly in the realm of the woefully uninspiring, and plain bad - whereas 3/4* to 0 is reserved only for the embarrassments, the full-scale atrocities, and the morbid fascinations.

Factors include, but are not limited to in-ring work, crowd heat, psychology, storytelling, significance and innovation...

*As suggested by the title, only the main portion of the show will be included. If WWE can barely bother themselves to promote the Kickoff, the feeling is reciprocated.

Contributor
Contributor

Former Power Slam Magazine scribe and author of Development Hell: The NXT Story - available NOW on shop.whatculture.com!

Discussion