10 WWE Questions You Most Want Answered (June 29)
What's more important: exciting matches or exciting storylines?
After last week's explosive drama, it was nice of WWE to let things stir and settle a little - almost as if they were making way for the Game of Thrones finale to take centre stage. Thanks, WWE.
That's not to say nothing of note happened on Monday Night Raw, but its high points were more reactions to the drama of last week, as opposed to flashpoints in their own right. Most intriguingly, Seth Rollins and Dean Ambrose openly discussed Roman Reigns' suspension on WWE television!
Elsewhere, a pair of (ultimately meaningless) qualifying matches took place, the results of which saw Cena and Styles spurn chances to gatecrash the Battleground main event - which is probably for the best, as we need to see that Shield triple threat, and we need to see it now.
Here are your most probing questions in response to this week's WWE goings-on so far, as well as a smattering of timeless classics for us all to reflect upon.
Thanks to all those who submitted questions! Do follow our official twitter account at @WhatCultureWWE.
10. Were WWE Right To Use Roman Reigns' Suspension For A Storyline?
We start off with a question regarding the most shocking part of this week's Raw - the fact that Seth Rollins and Dean Ambrose openly acknowledged Roman Reigns' wellness policy violation on TV.
WWE usually sweep such news under the carpet, but their decision to air it as part of a storyline felt bold and fresh.
Had they done as many of us feared - and simply left Reigns' absence unexplained throughout the Battleground build-up - it would have resulted in a lopsided feud. The match itself could well have suffered as a result.
Instead, acknowledging the story allowed Seth Rollins' pettiness and Dean Ambrose's casual forgiveness to shine through, while humanising Roman at the same time - a quality he badly needed.