Another week, another boatload of questions - many linked by the common theme of "what the hell is going to happen at WrestleMania?". WWE's build-up to the biggest show of the year continues to baffle and frustrate, and although a great deal of the card has now taken shape, there are still many loose ends to be tied up. Complicating matters is Saturday's Roadblock event, which looks to be living up to its name more than we all hoped. The road to WrestleMania seems to have been put on hold while WWE forget about Roman Reigns (for now) and build up to a hastily thrown-together encounter between Dean Ambrose and Triple H. As if the main event scene wasn't confusing enough, we've also got Shane vs. Undertaker to worry about. Some of your questions were discussed at length by myself, Kenny and James on our new Tuesday Throwdown video-podcast - but we've still got ten additional queries to get through today. Let's get going! Thanks once again to everybody who submitted questions via Twitter, where you can find us at @WhatCultureWWE.
10. Would It Have Been Better To Book Undertaker Vs. A Young Talent?
@QUALITYDRAFT15 asks about the Undertaker vs. Shane match at WrestleMania 32, and ponders whether it would have been more beneficial to book the Deadman against a younger talent. While I'm usually in favour of elevating up-and-coming superstars, particularly with NXT so promising as of late, I don't think it would work in this specific instance. Taker's last 'Mania appearance was against a (relatively) new superstar in the form of Bray Wyatt, a pretty standard match which didn't benefit his opponent in the long run. With the Reigns vs. Triple H main event seemingly a foregone conclusion, the quality this year's PPV lacks the most is intrigue. The decision to book Undertaker vs. Shane, for all its flaws, has certainly added a little of that.
