John Cena. Randy Orton. There may not be two wrestlers that are more linked together than these two men that have combined to win 27 WWE World Heavyweight Titles between them. They trained together in OVW in the early 2000s, they both debuted on the main roster on Smackdown in 2002 and they were both main event performers within three years. Orton became a World Champion first, but Cena's the one that became the undisputed top babyface in the company. He's been in that spot for the past decade while Orton has mostly been a heel aside from a few runs as a babyface. It was announced this past Monday on Raw that the feud that will never end will continue for another PPV match, this time leading to a match at the October 26 Hell in a Cell PPV. Since Cena lost to Dean Ambrose on Raw, Orton gets to face. WWE made a point to not say that Cena was a loser even though he was. He was merely "the other guy" that Orton gets to face while Ambrose takes on Seth Rollins in the other Hell in a Cell match. There's a chance that Cena vs. Orton might even main event the Hell in a Cell PPV even though Ambrose vs. Rollins is the match most people are looking forward to. The reason is because Cena/Orton are such reliable performers for WWE that they're always going to be pushed in favorable positions. That's just how it is. Despite the fact that Cena and Orton are both very good performers that still have at least five years left as top guys (we're just guessing), fans are definitely sick of them facing each other. Why is that? Here are seven reasons.
John wrote at WhatCulture from December 2013 to December 2015. It was fun, but it's over for now. Follow him on Twitter @johnreport. You can also send an email to mrjohncanton@gmail.com with any questions or comments as well.
