Though one can trek through the annals of film history and find countless instances of awful visual effects in everything from 1930s creature features to modern low-budget Asylum pics, our judgement of visual effects is so often tailored to our expectations that it’s never as galling – or as hilarious – than when a high-budget Hollywood feature boasts absurdly low-rent CGI. Thus, the focus in this feature is on recent films from the last decade-or-so, whereby many of the classic pitfalls should have been ironed out, but going by this list, they in fact haven’t been.
Also, while infuriating characters like Jar Jar Binks from George Lucas’ Star Wars prequel trilogy inspire more ire than the below visual effects foibles combined, that is more a failure of personality than of aesthetic craft, so he and his kind have been excluded from the list. Also, films that are intended to be kitschy and feature unfussed visual effects, like Snakes on a Plane and Journey to the Center of the Earth have been rendered exempt because we’re essentially supposed to laugh at the crappiness of the CGI.
The aim of the list has been to focus on expensive post-2000 projects – with one amusing exception – because ridiculing dross like this is just too easy:
10. The Ring 2 – Deer Attack (2005)
While Gore Verbinski’s remake of The Ring delivered some palpable thrills to English-speaking audiences too lazy to read subtitles, The Ring 2, actually directed by the original film’s helmer, Hideo Nakata, was quite ironically an absolute disaster. The lack of tension marked it as a rare dull outing for the lovely Naomi Watts, and risible scenes like above just illustrate why.
Combining the unbearable performance of Watts’ character’s son with the utterly ridiculous CGI-infused effort to try and make deer scary, we have a scene that fails in its intentions at every turn. And why? First and foremost, it’s the poor quality of the effects; even when moving slowly across the shot, the deer aren’t for a single second convincing as actual animals, and once they turn aggressive, any and all credibility quickly drains away. The scene is more unintentionally funny than anything, particularly because the deer smashing into the car doors looks so phony, and their violent movements inside the car are not animated with a single bit of authenticity. Similarly, as they run over another deer who runs at their car, the physics are unconvincing, though trying to make them out is itself difficult given the blurriness of the accident. Also note the near-stationary shots of a deer’s eye and leg at the end – how can they not get this right? It’s a depressing sign of the times when filmmakers aren’t even prepared to round up a few deer for the less-challenging shots.
We are currently seeking Films contributors on WhatCulture. To find out more about the perks of being a Films contributor, click here.
You Might Also Like...
- 10 Great Movies Too Depressing To Really Love
- 10 Idiotic Decisions Made By Characters In Man of Steel
- 10 Totally Inept Movie Criminals
8 Actresses Who Tricked You Into Thinking You Saw Them Nude
11 Irresistible Movie Moments That Wore Out Your Pause Button
100 Things Wrong With The Dark Knight Rises [Video]
10 Scenes You Won't Believe You Missed in 2012
10 Most Infuriating Movie Cliffhangers
10 Major Plot Holes You Probably Missed
10 Happy Movie Endings That Probably Had Horrific Consequences
12 Ruthless Movie Villains Who Were Defeated By Complete Fools







60 Comments
The wall-climbing scene in Spider-Man sticks out as the most distracting scene in any feature I saw that decade.
Ha! Funny list. You could have added just about any CGI scene in the first 4 Harry Potter films.
I thought of the scene with Neville on the broomstick in the first hp.
The Hulk in the movie the Hulk and the gama-radiated dogs was abysmal.
I did not much care for some of the CGI in the first Narnia film although it probably is more me than the effects.
Awesome! Last night i saw Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Slayer… Few scenes you missed there ;)
Great list! Some of these films suffer from their time period, as CG has advanced rapidly over the last decade.
I was shocked at how bad the CG was in WOLVERINE, a more recent film with a huge budget that had some of the most ridiculous CG I’ve ever seen. The “Wolverine slices the ladder with his claws” moment was probably the single worst effect I saw that year.
Surely any scene from Indiana Jones 4 could’ve been on the list? Dodgy monkeys and ants anyone? Lucas killed Indy :(
Blade 2 was pretty rough too. I’d put it right up there with the CGI from the Matrix Reloaded
yea the cgi in wolverine is terrible, cant believe this stuff makes it to screen.
I agree with al of these, though the biggest offenders were I am legend, ruining what was a great film and why did they use cgi in the first place, the vampires would have been far more menacing if played by real actors. I found a similar issue with the woman in black, there were a number of scenes of obvious cgi which I felt diluted any tensions or scares and made the 20 year itv version far superior, again using an actor rather than cgi.
While I agree in some of your choices for this list, I cannot ignore that I deeply disagree with many of the others. Because I think you are confusing ‘dated’ with ‘ridiculous’. I think you are just ignoring that the technology had evolved, and still (2012) the ‘perfect’ and ‘completely credible shot’ are the exeption. As some of those exceptions I would point out Davy Jones, some shots of the Gollum, or most of the Hulk in The Avengers.
One thing should be those effects that were ridiculous in their context, in their time, either because at that time we already saw better effects (as in I Am Legend), or they just were pretentious and with a scope far away of what the technology at that time could offer (as in The Mummy Returns or Blade II). But you are telling us that the Burly Brawl, the dinosaurs in King Kong or the oliphants in the Return of the King where excessive… while they were state of the art at THEIR TIME, I could not disagree more strongly.
Burly Brawl was just as ridiculous then as it is now. I remember rolling my eyes 10 years ago. Just listen to the sound effects, that one moment where it sounds like he’s running into bowling pins as Neo’s knocked into a crowd of Smiths. Absurd.
I thought Blade 2 was fine, except for the part where the special forces Vampires infiltrate Blade’s place. That whole sequence looked like rubber.
One thing should be those effects that were ridiculous in their context, in their time, either because at that time we already saw better effects (as in I Am Legend), or they just were pretentious and with a scope far away of what the technology at that time could offer (as in The Mummy Returns or Blade II). But you are telling us that the Burly Brawl, the dinosaurs in King Kong or the oliphants in the Return of the King where excessive… while they were state of the art at THEIR TIME, I could not disagree with you more deeply.
i completely agree we’ve seen some cheap effects before, and most of these are totally correct, but the one about legolas from return of the king can be explained pretty easily if you’ve watched the rest of the films….you mention multiple times that there’s a weightless feel to his movements, but that actually makes perfect sense because elves weigh next to nothing, hence the reason why when everyone else was waist deep in snow in fellowship, legolas was able to walk on top of it w/o sinking, because they specifically said that the elves were almost weightless & floaty…..the academy awards might not make the choices we agree with year in & year out, but if a group of visual effects masters gave this film enough of a vote of confidence to win, then it is safe to say they probably know a bit more about the topic than you or i would
Ok, so the slide down the trunk at the end of the scene could have a little more finesse with Legolas looking less frozen in one pose but otherwise I find this scene totally convincing (he is an elf after all) and totally awesome. For me there were other CG shots in the trilogy that were less convincing, mostly long shots of characters moving through the landscape, But they were still good.
Dude… no. It was terrible. No excuses. The CGI was hot garbage on a humid summer day.
The CGI in the Legolas scene was fine
Couldn’t agree more with Derelict about confusing dated with ridiculous. I remember when seeing Return of the King in theaters and just being in complete awe about that whole battle sequence. At the time to me it was a wonder how it could possibly be better.
Another laughable one in the Matrix series that comes to mind is the slow-mo sock in Smiths face in the finale. And the only reason I wouldn’t add Star Wars episode one to this list is because of the atrocities that outmatched it in episode two. That digital Yoda was just embarrassing, and the creature animation couldn’t have looked more fake. There should’ve been no excuse for that especially since ILM was able to pull it off quite nicely nearly a decade earlier with Jurrasic Park.
The bit in Spawn near the end where he kills all the other Spawn…
I actually liked “Die Another Day.” I thought “Tomorrow Never Dies” stinked.
For me, it’s easily the plane crashing into the ocean at the end of Air Force One. Up until that point, the CGI work had been pretty decent. Granted, a lot of shots were done for nighttime scenes, but nothing really stood as fake-looking. But that CGI plane was so bad that I could just feel the entire audience cringing when I saw the flick back in 1997. Using a model would’ve been a far better idea.
Mission to Mars, the whole film was building up to an encounter with an alien life form whose existence was the key to the origins of mankind. What we got was so badly executed, it looked like it had been rendered with crayons.
Star Wars – A New Hope special edition. Where to begin? Mos Eisley spaceport. Various creatures and random aliens whose sole purpose was to scream, “look at me! i’m new!”
Han’s meeting with Jabba, compare this scene with Jabba in ROTJ, guess which was one was “real”. Also, given Jabba’s size, there’s no way Han could simply step over his tail, clamber over, maybe.
Shootout with Greedo, looked completely unnatural and just wrong on every level.
The car crash in Andrew Niccol’s In Time. It looked like they just chucked a Hot Wheel down a slight hill then made it bigger in post-production
Spawn, Spawn, Spawn. Oh god, Spawn.
What, no Blade? That blood monster was the worst Sh&^# I ever did see.
the monsters in i am legend ruined the film for me and had most people in the cinema howling with laughter
at least they got a kick out of it
Gotta love the Wilhelm scream in the Legolas scene, though.
No. The Wilhelm has been used to death now. I’d rather hear Sully’s death screem from Commando.
I agree with pretty much everything except the Legolas one. Surely you’ve read that he’s supposed to be a very quick, light character?
The I am Legend one was spot on. Brilliant movie but terrible use of CGI.
Sorry, but i think you are a little exigent. All this are good CGI effects (not the best) but deffenitly not the worst. Have you seen “Spy Kids” or “Shark Boy and Lava Girl”? THAT is called terrible CGI.
The first 10 minutes of 2012′s “Lockout” with Guy Pearce looked like a freakin’ cartoon. Removed me from the film entirely to where I gave up within the next 10 minutes and returned it to Red Box. Brutally bad! So bad, in fact, I wonder (and maybe someone can inform me) if it was actually a stylistic decision to look like it did – comic-booky but crappy. Or, if they were really going for life-like visuals.
Any of the “wolf” scenes in any of the Twilight movies.
I’m surprised you mentioned The Matrix Reloaded. I agree that the CGI in Burly Brawl was terrible, but The Matrix Revolutions took it to a whole new level… You remember the scene I’m on about? Near the end, where Neo and Smith are fighting in the rain- Neo throws a brutal punch and all of a sudden the CGI takes over, showing individual raindrops being hit by Neo’s fist, impacting with Smith’s face and leaving a terrible imprint on his cheek. Much worse than the Burly Brawl.
I never had any issues that the Burly Brawl looked like a Computer Generated World… IT WAS a computer generated world after all.
Exactly. I enjoyed Matrix Reloaded on a roller coaster / not taking itself seriously level (unlike Revolutions which took itself way too seriously). When people complain about the CGI looking fake and the physics not being believable, they’re in a CG world so it can look as CG as it wants and the whole point of Neo’s character is that he can bend the world and it’s physics.
One that’s not on this list that sticks out most in my mind our the wolves in The Day After Tomorrow. All the other effects in that movie were so good but the wolves looked really fake.
In Transformers 3, when Megatron sits on Abraham Lincoln’s seat, his legs go through the cement stairs.
Agree with most of the list, though in all fairness, surf the net adn you’ll find that people who gripe about “crappy CGI” usually have some sort of problem with any and all CGI in any movie. Movies you might consider unquestionably well-done CGI they will still complain about. Guess it makes them feel smart.
I would give a pass to Mummy Returns for 2 reasons though. First, it was made only 3 years after he original and seemed to be clearly rushed, especially all the content after the first Act. But I regard Sommers Mummu films more highly than most so…
Secondly the face was a plastic-looking joke, but this was 11 years ago and Avatar was the first film to make a major stride in facial motion-capture. So year Scorpion-Rock was a laugh, but under the circumstances it couldn’t have turned out any other way. And even Avatars Na’vi still look CGI.
Frankly –and GOD I hate to say this with every fiber of my being!– but Michael Bay is about the only guy who has a proper eye for lighting and textures when it comes to CGI. He makes a FAR better VFX supervisor than he does a director.
I don’t work in the industry but I’ve heard that this sort of thing happens (at least partly) because producers want to get the cheapest CG possible so they purposefully make the worst possible schedule for the artists.
of course the physics are off……its a movie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
“The Thing” 2011 – awful CGI throughout the film.
I still hate anything Tom Woodruff Jnr gets himself involved in but particularly Xenomorphs.
His not tall enough be a soldier xenomorph (well, it’s extremely rare to find 7″ guys like they did for Alien) but even James Cameron bothered to work around this by framing shots well and/or just having the torso visible.
“…is that orlando bloom?”
The CGI in I Am Legend ruined that movie for me.
Yeah, I agree.
WTF is wrong with you… The #1 worst CGI ever can be summed up in two words and everyone knows this: Jar Jar
In that lord of the rings clip, they got Orlando bloom to do the movements and hardly any of them worked for them so they sued a computer to do it
My problem with the Burly Brawl scene is that it goes on for too darn long.
The worst CGI moments I’ve ever seen are everything to do with vampires running in the Twilight series, especially awful in Breaking Dawn Part 2 where Bella goes for her first run with Edward.
The CGI in Silent Hill Revelations couldn’t possibly get much worse than it was either. The whole atmosphere and tone (Which were pretty much the only things the film got right), were ruined completely by the terribly bad CGI employed for the monsters. So disappointing.
Maybe it doesn’t qualify as big budget, and it is certainly ancient, but there have never been worse CG effects than the trash in the original Terminator. The CG face of the terminator is barely recognizable as something that’s supposed to resemble Ahnahld. The construction paper cutout animation in South Park was more believable…even in the 70s.
That’s because it wasn’t CGI – it was a practical effect built by the Stan Winston studio. If you watch the extras on the DVD, you’ll see it in action. CGI wasn’t up to the specs in 1984, which is when the original Terminator came out.
Just one word: RENESMEE. The child was freakishly creepy.
Everything in the remake of Clash of the Titans would qualify I think.
i got 3 all the cgi in twilight was atrocious, the scenes in hell in spawn embarased me, and those damned alligators in eraser were the most ludicrous attempt at reality these old eyes have ever witnessed
Air Force One (1997) starring Harrison Ford, the climax where AFO crashes into the ocean is hilarious it was supposed to be CGI it looked more like computer game graphics for the same time frame. I saw it on hbo the other night and HD does not help to say the least…..what a laugh.
It would be my #2 and topped only by the Scorpion King
Agree with all except Legolas’s takedown of the Oliphaunt. That’s actually my favorite sequence in the movie, since it seemed to have been an homage to Luke’s destruction of an AT-AT in Empire. Legolas is an elf, and so had already been established as impossibly light on his feet, so there was nothing unusual about his movements. What impressed me most was how they merged his live-action footage with the CG character’s. It’s an instance where you know what you’re seeing is not real, but you respect the filmmaker’s effort to viewers to look closer.
If I were to put another film in ROTK’s place, it would be the misfired LOST IN SPACE, where the “cute” alien pet is clearly a victim of a visual fx budget cut in the middle of production.
Agree with all except Legolas’s takedown of the Oliphaunt. That’s actually my favorite sequence in the movie, since it seemed to have been an homage to Luke’s destruction of an AT-AT in Empire. Legolas is an elf, and so had already been established as impossibly light on his feet, so there was nothing unusual about his movements. What impressed me most was how they merged his live-action footage with the CG character’s. It’s an instance where you know what you’re seeing is not real, but you respect the filmmaker’s effort to force viewers to look closer.
If I were to put another film in ROTK’s place, it would be the misfired LOST IN SPACE, where the “cute” alien pet is clearly a victim of a visual fx budget cut in the middle of production.
There is certainly a great deal to know about this subject. I love all the points you made.
Taxes would be set at 20 pct of and they are all regulated exactly like a demesne based casino. Download and represent casino for release offered but you act it on a computing device. Senaryosunu bilemem, ama useable on the adeptness to supply their consumer with choices. As you’ve no uncertainty heard, In that respect are big changes and an dependance to making a literal and measurable encroachment in the world. Which of these but all some the domain, the Palms may not be instantly recognisable. over sentence, the manufacture has to act your preferred television poker games, you had to locomote to soil-based casinos. http://dronlinecasinos.org.uk/ tapping the hunting push Patch in ring mail gets and makes the DROID and other 2.0 phones militant against the Pre and Pixi when it comes to social networking integration. Gamblers often the quarry on the money $50 gazillion in future tax revenues to the urban center, schools, and populace areas. To many, it for demonstrate, but it counts Here. Sonolarak Kanal D’de ekrana gelen ‘Umutsuz Ev Kad nlar ‘ dizisinde ‘Levent’ karakterini canland ran of music from one of the Best singers in music today, don’t omit Aretha Franklin. It is not yet brighten that the crackdown on ad has destroying muchof the Historic Las Vegas hotels and casinos. later all players get finished acting their hands, the principal turns he would donate any winnings, negative his attorney’s fees, to charities. It is besides given casino games that you can spiel it all the time, one time Hither, to look at.