Rating: 




“The Inakians are invading Branakha to take the iridianonan back to Nu’cha! Quickly, to the light ship!” This is not a direct quote from Disney’s John Carter – for a start I’ve made up all my own silly fantasy words – but I think it represents faithfully what much of the dialogue sounds like. For long spells of Wall-E director Andrew Stanton’s debut live action film this jargon combines with some elaborate fancy dress costumes to create a world that’s difficult to invest in emotionally, even if it always looks very nice. This isn’t such a problem when we’re watching pretty Earthman John Carter (Taylor Kitsch) beat the hell from a gigantic, albino space ape – but it becomes more incongruous when we get bogged down in the rote love story and earnest father-daughter drama.
Adapted from Edgar Rice Burroughs’ near century old pulp novel A Princess of Mars, Stanton deserves credit for coming at the text with disarming sincerity and obvious love, telling this schlocky sci-fi story without cynicism or a protective barrier of irony. This is perhaps as strong a representation of Burroughs’ story as you could see committed to film, with scantily clad warrior heroes leaping between exotic airships, dispatching blue-blooded beasts with glimmering swords. Yet with inter-character relationships not the book’s (or, as it turns out, the film’s) strongest suit, adapting this text at all seems redundant given that all the best bits have already long since been appropriated by other Hollywood movies.
Since the very first trailers critics have been quick to note superficial similarities to Avatar (white man assimilated by alien tribe), with large dollops of Star Wars (such as the arena scene from Episode II), and even echoes of last year’s dreary Cowboys and Aliens (wandering outlaw Carter wakes up in a dessert with new powers and haunted by backflashes to the wife he could not protect). No doubt these elements stem from the highly influential original novel and have been used here in good faith, yet it’s still difficult to shake the feeling that much of this has been done before. There are a few eye-popping sequences, such as when Carter is chased by a vicious horde of beasties, but these are separated by long and cumbersome dramatic scenes in a film that’s on the wrong side of the two hour mark.
For those not in the know, John Carter is the story of Taylor “he’s so hot right now” Kitsch’s titular hero: a Confederate soldier in 19th century Virginia, transported to Mars (known to the locals as Barsoom) after touching a mysterious, glowing amulet. Once on the red planet he discovers not only that the difference in gravity has increased his strength and agility (meaning he is now potentially a pretty awesome superhero), but that he is not alone. In fact Barsoom is populated by several warring tribes and species. The technologically advanced humanoid Red Men of Zodanga (who live in a cool moving city) and Helium are embroiled in a cataclysmic conflict which threatens to destroy all life on the planet, whilst neither group gets on at all well with the Tharks – one of many primitive tribes of tall, four-limbed Green Martians. Pulling all the strings are a strange group of shape-shifting, teleporting, all-powerful beings called the Holy Therns – glowing blue space monks lead by bad guy du jour Mark Strong.
The film is ultimately about Carter’s Han Solo-esque journey from self-interested nihilist to righteous interplanetary hero, as he goes from seeking a way back to Earth (and his cave o’ gold) to understanding that he can use his new abilities to help save Barsoom and all who dwell there. Like Spider-Man, Carter learns the hard way that “with great power comes great responsibility”. After becoming the unlikely (and reluctant) champion of the Tharks, Carter becomes locked into the battle between the Red Men, bumping into Princess Dejah of Helium (Lynn Collins) and falling for her capable, sassy Princess Leia-esque charms. Dejah is being forced to wed the villainous leader of the Zodangans (Dominic West) by her peace-seeking father (Ciarán Hinds) and this just won’t do. So she looks to persuade Carter to help save her father’s kingdom.
The film is at its most fun when Carter is in the company of the Tharks, who are generally pretty terrific. As a rule, the more Tharks on the screen the better the sequence, with the human characters quite boring by comparison – with charismatic actors like James Purefoy underused. The motion capture of the alien characters is brilliant, getting a lot out of performances from Willem Dafoe, Samantha Morton and Thomas Haden Church without venturing anywhere close to the uncanny valley. The Thark characters are somehow at once stylised and realistic, fitting in with the human characters perfectly and with a very subtle range of expressions. The use of CG is overall pretty stunning and seamless, though Stanton perhaps could have done without the cutesy animal companion character – a staple of animated films that works less well in live action.
I don’t intend this as faint praise at all, but I think John Carter will work really well for the young boys who no doubt form its intended audience. Carter is a character of pure, childish wish-fulfillment: he cuts down armies of alien warriors with seeming ease, jumps through the air in a way which almost certainly inspired the original (non-flying) incarnation of Superman, and he wins the love of a smoking hot space princess. The film is soaked in kid-friendly blue gore, with Carter at one point emerging victorious from a creatures entrails. In another scene he is shown standing in the middle of a pile of his fallen foes. I know I would have appreciated this high body count (in a Disney movie, no less) when I was 12, even if, as an adult, I find this unrepentant violence more problematic.
Unlike most post-war heroes, Carter never shies away from a fight. There is never the slightest pretense that he’d rather not have to kill his enemies – that he has been forced into violence. If you come at him with a sword he will cut your head off and not feel the least bit bad about it. He belongs in a category of hero with Conan the Barbarian or Burroughs’ own Tarzan: muscular, animalistic men. At times it seems, far from being the peacemaker, Carter is just another part of the problem – another weapon ready to be used by whichever side has the most attractive available female. When he does reach his moment of supposed character growth, it reads more as recognition that he has a pretty sweet deal away from Earth than of a newly awakened altruistic spirit.
I feel genuinely bad in not being overly enthusiastic about John Carter. On a personal level, it’s one of the films I’ve been most looking forward to for a long time and I’m a big fan of Andrew Stanton – as a director and, for what it’s worth, as a bloke. But even apart from that, it’s not desirable to knock a film with as much love and imagination plainly invested in it as this. As with Tron: Legacy, from a design perspective the film is faultless and a thing of beauty. Yet like that earlier Disney movie, the human factor is sadly wanting despite the best efforts of all involved. Though I would add that those lucky few who live near an IMAX would be strongly advised to check it out, with the movie painted on a large canvass that recalls Lawrence of Arabia or a John Ford western as much as anything. I also suspect fans of the books – already invested in the film’s peculiar lore – will find much to love.
John Carter is released in the UK and US from March 9th.
8 Actresses Who Tricked You Into Thinking You Saw Them Nude
11 Irresistible Movie Moments That Wore Out Your Pause Button
100 Things Wrong With The Dark Knight Rises [Video]
10 Scenes You Won't Believe You Missed in 2012
10 Most Infuriating Movie Cliffhangers
10 Major Plot Holes You Probably Missed
10 Happy Movie Endings That Probably Had Horrific Consequences
12 Ruthless Movie Villains Who Were Defeated By Complete Fools
Want to write about the stuff you're passionate about and have your work read by an audience of over 10 million a month? Click here to become a contributor.










21 Comments
First, lip my sack!
Cant wait to see it. Also piece of advice, read the books. You sound like you read the synopsis but read the whole series its pretty awesome. You will find Woola is a pretty significant character in the books. It seems like he must have gotten a Disney makeover but that is also how he is written in the book but a lot uglier. Then again this is what makes this book so great is how advanced it was for its time. I think its great to see it brought to life its long overdue. Its too bad that other movies came out before this and have stolen its thunder so to speak. Those movies wouldnt have existed if it wasnt for this story..
CANT WAIT..Bart Scott
Yeah, that’s a fair comment. Like I say, I really wanted to love this and I guess I’m just disappointed that I didn’t. I reckon people who love the books will really go for the movie.
Yeah, what’s with the cutesy animal comment? Woola wasn’t some creation thought up for the movie, he’s a big part of the book(s) and (hopefully) the movie as well.
Taylor Kitch always looks like hes trying to pull off blue steel
Come on! At the very least get the last name of the author we owe our entire love of Sci-fi to! Burroughs! Not Burrows!!!! You mispelled it 3 times!
Rookie error. I stand corrected. Can I just say, on a personal level, that I’m loving the overall cordial nature of the disagreement from Burroughs fans on this thread. No one flinging any insults, which is refreshing.
The film could have done without WOOLA?!! Has this guy even read the books?? Sheer blasphemy my friend, don’t do it again. Not to mention most audience reviews have stated that woola is one of the best parts of the whole film. Seriously. Smh
But overall, good review :)
A decent review, but would have been much improved if Robert had also read the source material. Since Burroughs(along with Verne and Howard) were my intro to a lifetime love affair with the genre, but I’m still not sure how much to temper my expectations. A true love of the source material is needed to make a movie like this work(ala Peter Jackson and LOTR), I still have to wonder how much of a hand those hacks at Disney had in this. But lots of elements look promising so this fanboy will be going regardless. I just hope it’s good enough that the wife doesn’t invoke the penalty clause for making her see it with me.
Don’t even remember how I stumbled upon “A Prince of Mars” when I was about 13. Now, dare I say, I’m 50. When I heard they were making the movie I was 13 again. Anyone can say anything they like but let’s face it, those of us who read these books as kids, or adults, are going to the movies on March 9th. P.S. I’m bringing my kids as props.
I know “Princess”
It’s funny how your entire review, instead of giving props to the film and the original story “Princess of Mars” for being the seed of many of the great sci-fi ideas and themes that have made it film, you use modern films examples to almost portray the John Carter as ripping off said ideas. You actually state in the beginning that modern sci-fi riffing off John Carter or the original story is a detractor for the film. How does that work exactly. Is it your opinion that the adventures of John Carter, one of the earliest most groundbreaking and beloved sci-fi anthologies, be rewritten because over the last century films, tv, comics, novels have ripped it off.
btw this is coming for someone who has not read a single piece of fiction relating to John Carter in his life.
This is a film review: it doesn’t have to consider the source material and should be taken as a separate entity.
I just read the book in preparation for the movie and I have to say it sounds like a lot has been changed from it. Deja Thoris is on a mapping expedition when the Tharks shoot down her ship and take her prisoner. John Carter helps her escape and she is captured by Zodangans who live on the ground not on a floating city, which starts the war from my reading. It sounds like the atmosphere factory has been taken out and a totally new story about father and daughter brought in. The Holy Tharns aren’t in Princess of Mars so maybe the movie is a conflation of the first two or three. And finally, it does sound as if they ripped off Cowboys and Aliens since there is no first wife that couldn’t be saved and John Carter was not an outlaw just running away from Apaches, though maybe that got changed for PC reasons.
Still it looks impressive from the trailers. I just wonder if Sola has as big a role in it.
P.S. Do they have the egg thing included?
The one thing that bothers me here is per the review they portray John Carter as a materialistic figure. All of the books portray him as the Southern gentleman, valuing actions regardless of station, fighting for honor and justice. I just hope they can pull off a realistic change from outlaw to planetary Warlord effectively.
Completely agree but I am giving it the benefit of the doubt in case the promos dont do it justice. It seems like a lot is out of whack but I am hoping they stay true somewhat to the material. Carters look, while I like it, is different from the book too.
I have to say that I’ve been waiting for this film for many, many years. I first found this story in a batch of comic books my older brother had in the middle 1970′s and was so enthralled with the story that I searched out the nearest and best outlet for the novels; our local library. I knew that when Star Wars came out that the story lines were borrowed and lamented over why they (the producers) couldn’t just make a film based on the original subject. Of course, the story line of this film looks to be lacking from the original subject, but I’m just so excited to see John Carter on film that I’m willing to cut these guys a little slack!! One thing though… What’s with the costumes??? Dejah Thoris is supposed to be naked!!! Dang Disney.
I know, right?
looks promising. 3D or not 3D ?