Taken 2: 5 Reasons It Didn't Cut The Mustard
Despite lukewarm critical reviews, the original Taken - which saw Liam Neeson in an unlikely action hero role - was embraced by audiences as an exciting, cathartic exercise in pure no-brains revenge cinema. Tight, simply plotted, relentless in its depictions of bloody violence (made even bloodier when the DVD hit shelves with an 18 rating), Taken was the guilty pleasure that didn't make you feel so guilty. Cinephiles would probably agree that it isn't a great film by any means, but as a highly enjoyable genre movie, it really hit the spot. So 5 years later, with Taken now firmly established as a modern cult classic, the sequel emerges. For any fan of the original flick, that's an exciting prospect: Neeson back on the streets of Europe with that same straight-faced sense of vengeance and "a very particular set of skills." And yet, Taken 2, though a fair and relatively enjoyable action movie, is utterly generic in every inch of its makeup. Here's what went wrong...