The Daily Mail inexplicably jumped the gun and wrongly announced that Amanda Knox was found guilty in her appeal against the murder of British student Meredith Kercher.
The article, which appeared online at 8.50pm UK time and was still available 25 minutes later, stated that Amanda Knox’s appeal against her conviction had been rejected by the Italian court of six jurors and two judges.
Nick Pisa, the journalist who wrote the article, has also worked on behalf of CNN, Sky News and The Telegraph.
The story included completely fabricated “reactions” from prosecutors, Amanda Knox herself and the Kercher family. Prosecutors were said to be delighted with the news that Knox would be returning to jail.
DailyMail.co.uk’s extraordinary article also stated that her boyfriend at the time, Raffaele Sollecito, was to also remain in jail for the remainder of his original 25 year sentence. He was also released and found not guilty murder.
The article, which was acompanied by the headline “Guilty: Amanda Knox looks stunned as appeal against murder conviction is rejected”, read:
Amanda Knox looked stunned this evening after she dramatically lost her prison appeal against her murder conviction.
Knox, 24, and her family had high hopes that she would be freed and allowed to return home after spending the last four years behind bars for the killing of Meredith Kercher in Perugia, Italy, in 2007.
In December 2009 she had been sentenced to 26 years and last night the judge and jury agreed with prosecutors that she should remain in prison as they accepted that she had brutally murdered student Meredith.
The 21-year-old was found semi naked in a pool of blood with her throat slashed in her bedroom of the house she shared with American Knox and two Italian women.
Judge Claudio Pratillo Hellman also ruled that Raffaele Sollecito, 27, Knox’s former boyfriend, should remain in jail and confirmed the original 25-year sentence on the computer studies graduate.
As Knox realised the enormity of what judge Hellman was saying she sank into her chair sobbing uncontrollably while her family and friends hugged each other in tears.
A few feet away Meredith’s mother Arline, her sister Stephanie and brother Lyle, who had flown in especially for the verdict remained expressionless, staring straight ahead, glancing over just once at the distraught Knox family.
Prosecutors were delighted with the verdict and said that ‘justice has been done’ although they said on a ‘human factor it was sad two young people would be spending years in jail’.
Both Knox and Sollecito – who have always denied any involvement in the brutal murder – said they would take the case to the third and final level of appeal at the Supreme Court in Rome where it will probably be heard late next year.
The ten-month appeal hearing had heard from several witnesses who had given evidence in the first trial but most importantly from two independent court appointed DNA experts.
Professors Carla Vecchiotti and Stefano Conti had been asked to evaluate how the original DNA investigation had been carried out by the forensic police and highlighted several howling errors.
Key to the case had been a 12ins kitchen knife found at Sollecito’s apartment and on which was said to be DNA from Knox on the handle and that of Meredith on the blade.
But they had insisted the genetic evidence from Knox was so small it should not be used as conclusive proof against her – although they did admit it was her DNA on the handle.
Following the verdict Knox and Sollecito were taken out of court escorted by prison guards and into a waiting van which took her back to her cell at Capanne jail near Perugia and him to Terni jail, 60 miles away.
Both will be put on a suicide watch for the next few days as psychological assessments are made on each of them but this is usual practice for long term prisoners.
It later emerged that The Sun newspaper made a similar gaff, though they were quicker to rectify the mistake.
It is thought the Judge’s initial announcement that Knox was guilty of the lesser-crime, the defamation charge against the man she had accused of murdering Meredith Kercher, had caught out many trigger-happy online journalists.
Want to write about the stuff you're passionate about and have your work read by an audience of over 10 million a month? Click here to become a contributor.



23 Comments
You sort of expect that journos will have a write-up of big events like this prepped and ready ages before these days. But putting bogus quotes in them and THEN publishing them is just a whole new kind of stupid.
For something like this they’d normally have two written up – one for guilty, one for innocent. Hilarious that they managed to get a ‘scoop’ only for it to be completely wrong though!
There’s a reason it’s called The Daily Fail…
This is crazy!
What is?
The Daily Mail’s gun-jumping
I don’t know is Amanda Knox is guilty or innocent, but I do agree that the evidence was too thin. The only thing to do was to let her go.
POLL: Amanda Knox cleared of murder charges, was the court right?
Vote: http://www.wepolls.com/p/3095401
I saw this right after I watched the verdict. You can bet I’m posting guilty/innocent pages on facebook. I know everyone has both articles ready, but hello? HA!
Christ I knew Italian justice was slow, either that or the author is
“remain in jail for the remainder of his original 25 year trial.”
Thanks for pointing out the error. It was a long day! Updated the post.
typical – the black guy gets blamed for it all
Wow, this is Fox News type of fail-in-journalism.
What is up with the people in the industry today? None of them would pass journalism from my alma mater, and while I went to a great school, it’s just a state university- not ivy league.
These “journalists” are so outmatched by bloggers now it’s laughable.
I’m so glad justice was served and Ms. Knox gets to live her life after having a massive chunk of the best years of it ripped away unjustly.
I think you’ll find that Sky News ran the wrong verdict hence the Mail, Guardian and BBC all posting the wrong verdict. Why not bash them too?
That isn’t true? I was watching Sky News, and while the translator was a little slow it was clear, to me at least, she was explaining she was guilty of a lesser crime and not the murder.
Guardian had a mere sentence on their live blog saying that she had been found guilty and this was quickly amended with an apology. This is not quite the same as a full page article with quotes and reactions from the families and lawyers!
The confusion came after the Judge announced that she was guilty, however this was for slander.
This is just plain laughable–or it would be if the situation were less serious! These ppl call themselves JOURNALISTS?! They’d do better reading the entrails of animals!!
Just goes to prove what so many people have known for a long time. The mail is nothing more than a sensationalist rag and I for one wouldn’t hang it on the back of the bog door. It’s not even good enough for that.
So who did kill Cock Robin.?????? The truth is still out there.
Try and imagine the fun and games in regard to the Michael Jackson courtroom fiasco. This poor doc is being stitched up big time for me and used as someone to hang the dirty washing on. La-Toya should not have been allowed to make the statements and plea’s to the jury as they were prejudicial. We will see !
I was baffled this morning to hear the true verdict on my car radio when I had read this Mail article picked from Google News online last night. I thought perhaps I had dreamed that I read it!!!
That’s what you get for reading the Daily Mail – 95% of there stuff is incorrect or made up. They may occasionally get the headlines right (not this time thugh!) but the stories are mainly fabricated and littered (pun intended) with quotes from “people close to the source/family” etc.
This reminds me of the gushing newspaper/magazine report of how lovely the royals looked at the horse racing(?) event which got rained off!
“Nick Pisa”
They event invent the names of their ‘journalists’ FFS.