luis suarez

Along with goal-line technology and racism, diving – or “simulation” as the rules of the game would rather less colourfully have us call it – has yet again been one of the biggest buzxzwords of this past season. It seems that regardless of how much money you plough into a football team, the one thing you cannot guarantee is honour, and players who come in to top-level teams with £20million plus price-tags are often more likely simulate than those towards the bottom of the league.

The simple fact is that the element of human error that exists as part and parcel of the way the game is refeered determines that unfortunately the crime of simulation does pay. There are very few instances of retrospective punishment, and if a dive leads to a penalty, and that penalty to a goal, the spoils vastly outweigh the punishment. The debate over nature versus nurture rages on, as coaches ponder whether skills can be taught, but it seems that opportunism is almost certainly being encouraged at some level for even the most skilled of players.

Quite frankly too many players spend their time on the grass, rolling around like they’ve been hit by a tank, and sometimes it’s just plain ridiculous. And the longer the FA allows it to continue, the more embarrassing a blemish on the game’s reputation.

For anyone who didn’t know, this is the sort of reaction that real contact should elicit…

So, now to the infamous fakers, play-actors and downright dirty cheats who dived their way into every respectable fan’s bad books

We are currently seeking Football contributors on WhatCulture. To find out more about the perks of being a Football contributor, click here.

In this post: • • •