11 Reasons WWE Made Brock Lesnar Vs The Undertaker Hell In A Cell

WrestleMania has arrived early.

WWE announcing Brock Lesnar versus The Undertaker for October's Hell In A Cell show is a very bold move. It is a WrestleMania calibre main event, placed firmly in a month that is usually the dead end of WWE's year. The move was somewhat of a surprise. Industry experts had pegged the third instalment of this decade's Taker / Lesnar rivalry as taking place at April 2016's WrestleMania 32. Instead, Undertaker and Lesnar will wrestle inside the Hell In A Cell, as the main event of Hell In A Cell on October 25th. What's surprising about it, is that Lesnar has already wrestled four times this year, in addition to increased television appearances. Clearly, Vince McMahon got a much better deal out of Brock, during March's contract renewal negotiations. Also surprising is the fact that The Undertaker is about to wrestle his third match in the space of just seven months. Usually, he only works once every twelve months. It is unprecedented times, and the reasons behind these bold changes are numerous. They'll be explained in this feature, analysing why WWE had to make Lesnar and Undertaker at Hell In A Cell. As for the match, it should be the best of their recent work. The cell is a great gimmick, perfect for two giants like Lesnar and The Undertaker. It should be fun, and here's why WWE booked it so soon after the last battle of the deadman and the beast.
WWE Writer

Grahame Herbert hasn't written a bio just yet, but if they had... it would appear here.