8 Reasons Brock Lesnar Must Retire The Undertaker At WWE Hell In A Cell

When Brock Lesnar clashed with The Undertaker at SummerSlam in an epic rematch from their history making confrontation at WrestleMania 30, almost everyone assumed that the rubber match would come at next year's WrestleMania in Dallas. However, for whatever reason (most likely ailing TV ratings and WWE Network subscriber numbers), Vince McMahon has decided to bring their final battle forward to next week's Hell in a Cell. Now, the two WWE icons are set to clash in the demonic structure, and the outcome promises to dramatically change their futures with the company. Whoever wins will stand tall as the WWE's most dominant Superstar, but what of the loser? The careers of both men will be forever changed, that's for sure. However, in the case of the Deadman, this match needs to actually be the end of his career. That a statement which is likely to upset some, but there are eight very good reasons as to why The Beast needs to not only emerge victorious, but should be the one to end the storied 25 years that The Undertaker has spent entertaining the WWE Universe. Disagree? That's understandable, but allow me to explain why the only outcome that makes sense next Sunday is The Beast Incarnate finally laying the Deadman to rest...